Shop for thousands of Catholic gifts at Aquinas and More/affiliate/ThinkingCath1376
SiteSell Hosting

Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.

Anti-Church Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.

"Anti-Church Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Vic Biorseth, Sunday, October 23, 2016
http://www.CatholicAmericanThinker.com/

This is about the long-lasting culturally destructive effects of the illegally and unconstitutionally established so-called "Constitutional" Principle of Separation of Church and State.  It was from the beginning a clear-cut violation of the Constitution, and eventually became a string of violations of the religion clause of the First Amendment. 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. --Amendment I (Emphasis Added)

Congress was specifically prohibited from establishing a national religion, and specifically prohibited from interfering with freedom of conscience in choosing and living in accordance with the religion of the citizen's choosing. 

The original intent of the authors and ratifiers was to protect religion from the state.  The effect of the unconstitutional Supreme Court decision in the 1947 Everson case was to turn this upside down, and protect the government from religion.  It was to make something other than religion drive politics, and act as a base for determining right and wrong.  It was to secularize society.  In other words, to eventuate a secular government in control of religion. 

The Separation of Church and State treatment shows how Justice Black and the other Justices who sustained the Everson decision went out of their way to stretch a bus-fare issue for children into state-support of a religion, I believe with evil intent.  This was not merely an advancement of atheism/agnosticism in society, but an advancement of militant secularism

The religions (plural) the Framers and Ratifiers were freeing with the religion clause were the established Protestant denominations and the Catholicism of the existing Colonies at the time.  General Christianity, in other words.  Read through the American Quotations for the evidence.  Their own speeches, writings and arguments highlight Christianity being the bedrock foundation of their morality and their basis for civil law. 

Look through the Federalist Papers, the Anti-Federalist Papers, and you will come to no other conclusion.  The very wording of the Declaration of Independence, and the strong adherence to the principles established in the Declaration by the Constitution itself reveals it.  Judaism and Christianity alone, among all the world's religions, hold to the mirror image of God's Law seen in the Natural Law.  They are one and the same Law.  And they are the very basis of America as Constituted. 

That is what make us a "good" people; that is what makes "good" law. 

Christians electing Christians to legislate representative law. 

Moral people electing moral representatives should mean moral law. 

Here's what we said should be done in the Separation page:

I submit that, since the 1947 Everson case, our government has systematically violated our religious freedom by imposing a state religion of atheism, through a program of legal secularization. This secularization is, precisely, a program of religious cleansing, of the public square and of the American people, being done by the American government. American citizens are increasingly forced by civil law to be, appear to be or pretend to be either atheists, or such pervasive moral relativists as to be guilty of the mortal sin of indifferentism.

The Constitution restricted the government from dictating religion to the people.  The Court turned this around, and set the government to legally secularizing itself, divorcing itself from God, and thereby beginning a program of legally secularizing the people.  The unseen victim in this program was the Judeo-Christian religion itself, and the Judeo-Christian moral code that formed the original basis for the very idea of America. 

I further submit that Justice Black and the 1947 Court was out of order in the Everson decision; that it had no foundation in precedent or existing law, that it was an arbitrary and personal opinion, that it has had tragic consequences adversely affecting the morality of the American people and the integrity of the American government. It should therefore be overturned. The Supreme Court overstepped its bounds in establishing what amounted to new law, which is unrepresentative law. It is not within the duties of the Supreme Court to dictate new law by the method of establishing bogus legal precedent of use in suppressing open Christian religious exercise and Christian religious expression anywhere in America. Such religious suppression represents an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment free exercise clause.

Just as the Court established the Principle of Judicial Review, in Maybury v. Madison in 1803, the Congress may establish a Principle of Congressional Review, and the President may establish a Principle of Executive Review, by overturning clearly unconstitutional, Court-established legal precedent, and declaring it null, void and no precedent from that date forward. 

The 1947 Everson case should be overruled by the Legislative branch or by the Executive branch, either acting together or acting singly. The Court, the Legislature and the Executive are all co-equal branches of the American government. The Court has no dictatorial authority to establish new “Constitutional principles” that may not be found anywhere in the Constitution.

Congress and/or the President should have acted to put this aside in 1947. Since it didn’t happen then, it remains for a future government to do it.

His will be done.

As in so many other cases, Everson violated the Constitutional Principle of Separation of Powers.  In effect, it made New Law, which didn't exist before, without legislation and without representation, usurping the exclusive law making authority of the Congress, as expressed in Article One Section One

  1. All a new President or a new Congress has to do, very simply,  is to Declare It Null.  Following the precedent set by the Court in Maybury v Madison, a President could do it, or a Congress could do it.  An unconstitutional law is no law. 

    Nothing to it but to do it. 
  2. The Attorney General and Department of Justice should aggressively pursue restitution and damages for victims of legal violation of religious rights through court actions.  Bakers, photographers, caterers and any others who have suffered at the hands of any corrupted, anti-Constitution legal system deserve restoration of losses and suffering for keeping and living their faith. 
  3. Organizations, attorneys, courts and judges who directly violated citizen rights to freedom of religion should similarly be prosecuted for fines, disbarment and removal from office. 

The Constitution is either the Supreme Law of the Land or it is not. 

Question:  If not Christianity, what basis is their for civil law? 

Answer:  What we have now. 

Look around. 

  • Men with the legal "right" to enter the lady's room. 
  • Legalized public blasphemy against the majority religion.
  • Satanic statues in public places, protected by law.
  • State protection of Islam, which intends to destroy the entire First Amendment and is irreconcilably and violently opposed to the whole of the Constitution, and to all of the established Natural Law rights in the Declaration. 
  • State sponsorship of the advance of Marxist ideology, which, like Islam, is absolutely antithetical to Constitutional America, yet sponsored and grown by government, both in government itself and in American culture. 
  • State sponsored opposition to nature itself, through government advancement of Scientism for purely political purposes. 
  • Absolutely unrepresentative "representative government". 

And all the Marxist ideologues dressed up as conservatives wonder why so many among We The People are so enthralled with Donald Trump. 

May God help us to help ourselves. 



=====

Reference Material

Return to Latest page

Return to HOME PAGE

Hover-Link Footnotes:  For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links.  (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)

SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
GESGOEAEOT2 Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time
PEWAG3 Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild Assed Guess
TTRSTF4 Them There Real Scientifical Type Fellers
TTRSPTF5 Them There Real Smart Perfesser Type Fellers
TTRSJTF6 Them There Real Smart Journalistical Type Fellers
SNRTACBT7 Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today
STNSEACPB8 Surely Today No Serious, Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe
WDN9 We Don't Know
BMDFP10 Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs
HBAACOTE11 Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth
ACLU12 Anti-Christian Litigation Union
FLORMPORIF13 Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool
MEJTML14 Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
IEJTML15 Islamic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
MPAV16 Marxist Principles And Values
WBESSWG17 Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance
TRMITM18 The Reason Man's In This Mess
IYI19 Intellectual Yet Idiotic

Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment

Comments

Respond to this specific article immediately below.  Or,
publish your own new subject Web Page.  Or,
publish your own unrelated brief Passing Thought.


Date:  Sun Oct 23 12:50:20 2016
From:  MaryEllen Lempa
Email:   maryellen_lempa@yahoo.com
Location:  Suburban Chicago
Comment: 

Appreciate your mighty pen (keyboard). You articulate a lot of my thoughts much more clearly than I ever could. Thank you.


Date:  Mon Oct 24 2016
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

MaryEllen:

You are most welcome.  I just pray that someone who can do something about it reads it. 

Regards,

Vic


Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders.  While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our standards of logical rigor and civil discourse.  We will not participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely trading insults.  Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged.  If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will not be published here.  If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil.  We humbly apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is. 

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information.  Elite Culturally Marxist Authoritarians will never tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their own pro-Marxist/anti-Christian/anti-American/Globalist/anti-Nation/immoral/anti-white/racist and bigoted point of view. 


Add Your Comment

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Please enter the word that you see below.

  


Copyrighted Material

Catch me at Trafeze
Your Host, Vic Biorseth

Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. 

Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription

Your email is perfectly secure here.  We use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
Newsletter

Back Issues

Keep This Website Going

Related WebPages

The Purpose of this grouping of links is to organize unrecognized violations of the Constitution that are illegally operative in American law in one place.  These long standing violations show how far our unconstitutional Political Parties have taken the American government out from under her own Constitution, which is the Supreme Law of the Land.  A violation of law is, by definition, a crime.  

The Impeachable Offenses Pages
A violation of the Constitution by a sworn officer of the federal government is an impeachable criminal offense.  Elected and appointed officers of the federal government-Presidents, Vice Presidents, Senators, Congressmen and Supreme Court Justices-and various Cabinet officers and others who serve with the advice and consent of the Senate, are all sworn to uphold the Constitution.  That is their job and their responsibility.  If they violate the Constitution and their sworn oath of office they thereby commit an impeachable (and indictable) criminal offense ranging from criminal malfeasance in office up to treason. 

Abortion Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Abortion Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Homo Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Homo Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Health Care Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Health Care Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Anti-Church Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Anti-Church Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Anti-Gun Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Anti-Gun Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Socialist Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Socialist Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

Islamic Rights: Criminal Malfeasance in the Federal Government.  "Islamic Rights" show the need to nullify unconstitutional law and impeach Supreme Court Justices and others who violated the Constitution.

What are We The People to do with Roberts and his court? Impeach the bastards!  Roberts joined four other Justices in direct opposition to our Constitution, and yes, we should impeach the bastards.

Traditional Latin Tridentine Mass, offered at Assumption Grotto Church in  Detroit, Michigan.  Our deepest prayer, our highest form of worship, and the way God should be treated.

Find a Latin Mass

The Vietnam War Proved the American News Media's Treacherous Anti-American Marxism.
Note the Military Assault Rifle common to the American Founding Era.

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

(See The Darwinism Pages)

If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the
SITE MAP.