Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, Sunday, June
The fully believing, uncompromising, true to Doctrine practicing Catholic layman is becoming as rare as the fully recognizing, understanding, patriotic, loving, embracing Constitutionalist American Citizen. Some days, more days than most, it even appears that there just ain't no such thing any more.
Among those sitting in the pews every Sunday, how many are fornicating, but not by that ancient but true and accurate name? They fornicate by other names, such as moving in together, living together, sharing a life, or one of the modern favorites, being Significant Others. It used to be called shacking up, and it used to be a shameful thing. And now there's just loosie-goosey "Hooking Up, now and then, and again, and again, and again.
Among those coming to the Communion Rail every Sunday, how many do you suppose see nothing wrong with their regular use of artificial contraception? And how many who come forward have missed Mass since their last Confession, and yet still come forward, and see nothing wrong in it?
It's no big deal; in many Parishes, in many Dioceses and Archdioceses, it really is no big deal. It's a commonplace thing. It has become part of a major, if deluded, overall consensus of thought or opinion, that says that now, this stuff is OK, when it isn't OK at all. Major consensus of opinion, or collective thought, or group-think, does not make something true to be untrue. The fact that lots of others around you say it's OK does not make it OK. The fact that clerics, or consecrated religious, or religion teachers say it's OK does not make it OK.
We have talked about Lip Service Catholics before. But if you want to know where all this "Collective Thinking" or "Consensus" came from, we have the Evil of Progressivism to thank for it, both in the slow destruction of Catholic Faith and adherence to permanent Doctrine, and in the slow, steady destruction of Constitutional America and the love of liberty and rule of law.
Anyone speaking out against this stuff is now outside the mainstream and subject to be shunned and anathematized for it. Believe me, I know. It is now the exact opposite of how it should be. It is as if Satan were now driving the American Catholic and Political Bus. Off a cliff.
Mortal Sin of various variety is now so commonly accepted that sinners openly speak of it, in public, even over the airwaves. Sean Hannity, for instance, has no problem telling his listening radio audience how he, like so many others, disagrees with the Catholic doctrine condemning artificial contraception, and he still considers himself to be Catholic, and he still presents himself for Communion in Catholic Churches. Hey, it's no big deal. Just as many Catholics as non-Catholics now use artificial contraception and are not ashamed to say it, and still come to communion, despite what 1 Cor 11:27-29 says about coming unworthily to Eucharist.
It's Cafeteria Sinning. You pick your sin, and if you, personally, no longer "feel" it's a sin, for you, then it is not a sin, for you, and you can just go ahead and commit it. That's modern "Progress". That's the new collective thinking that now has so much consensus behind it that those who have been herded into the collective thought actually believe it to be true.
But it is false.
It's Libertarian thinking. Libertarians typically encourage moral relativism in culture, and oppose any moral norms for a whole society. That is to say, Libertarians, or other "Political/Economic Conservatives, but Social Liberals", and like minds, could not logically oppose the end of civilization, for they have abandoned the logical argument - a fixed common moral standard - that establishes civil society.
The day men began to say things like "what's right or wrong for you may not be what's right or wrong for me" and/or "some of my best friends are gay" and/or "gay marriage doesn't affect me or mine at all" inside Catholic Parishes and inside Town Halls was the day true Progress became Regress. It may call itself Progressivism, but it is absolutely destructive of Christian Faith and Civil Society. This is thinking that cannot end well. It is a cancer on reasoned thought, that eventually reverses right and wrong, replaces free speech with controlled and forced speech, and reverses who is to be lauded and celebrated with who is to be shunned and anathematized. Eventually.
In thousands of Catholic Parishes the blending of responsibilities between clerics and laymen since the adoption of the Novus Ordo Mass have detracted from lay concentration on the glory of the Mass, and thus led to a slackening off of recognition of its importance to faith for many. Sometimes there are almost as many lay Eucharistic distributors as there are lay receivers of Communion, and it is a very big deal who is to be some kind of lay "minister" at Mass this week or next. We have to plan, you know.
Remember how simple it used to be? Now, in may Parishes, everything needs to be orchestrated by someone, usually a layman, down to the last detail, and still things go wrong in some little way. No big deal, I know, but - what are we laymen doing up there in the first place? Many may be more interested and concentrating on whatever ministerial part they have to play than they are in the Sacrament that is being presented and Who is being brought forth right in front of us.
Such careful orchestration was not necessary when only ordained clerics did every single thing, sometimes but not necessarily with some well trained altar boys helping out. I don't remember any Priest or Deacon ever suffering from Eucharistic Elbow or Overworked Arm or Aching Fingers from offering too many Consecrated Hosts to the laity. It never happened. Yet today, there are lots of Priests who feel they "need" the help of lay distributors. Collective Thinking, again, with a lot of Consensus. We are training each other, with our blind consensus. Consensus builds consensus; collective thinking builds collective thinking.
But, that's actually God in that little Host. It's actually God in that Cup.
If recognition of Who is in that bread and wine has been lessened, so has recognition of His representative among us, His Priest. Blending of lay and clerical responsibilities in Liturgy have also led to a blending of perceived importance of Priests and Laymen. Many Priests cooperate in this blending, seeing themselves as less "set aside" or apart from laity. The can't-wait-to-take-off-the-collar, just-call-me-Larry, just-one-of-the-boys Priests of current America.
Now, I'm not saying you shouldn't take your Pastor fishing, or hunting, or to a ball game or anything like that. But am I the only guy around here who remembers when there was never, ever, any mistake about who was a Catholic Priest anywhere in public, or when nobody would ever even think to address any Catholic Priest with any name that didn't begin with the honored title Father?
I can't help the fact that so many Priests cooperate in this "blending" of recognition, this lowering, in my estimation, of the importance of the office of the Priesthood in the collective mind of the laity. Whether they all agree with it or not, a Priest is indeed set apart from us, for a special purpose, and he is not the same as us, and he is always due the very special respect of his ordination.
This may - I can't know for sure - have contributed to Priestly leniency or "looking aside" when the Cafeteria Sinners come forward for Communion. The lines have been blurred between the clerics and the laity. More and more people come to Church for what they can get out of it, rather than to put something into it; to give God His due, on His day. Many Cafeteria Sinners come to Mass to get a good personal feeling, and if they don't get it, they won't be back; they'll go to another Parish, or drop out entirely, eventually.
And, - again, I can't know for sure - many Priests respond to this known threat by upping their "performance" to inspire people to stay, and come back again. Becoming less of a Priest and more of a Performer. Give 'em what they're looking for and they'll be back.
But, you know what used to set us apart, as a Church?
Hard, cold, unflinching, Rigid, dogmatic, Doctrine, proudly preached.
That was back in the day, when Catholic Churches were full, and growing, with two or three Priests per Parish. Full on fixed Doctrine didn't drive people away; it drew them in. It was what set us apart from all the Protestant denominations. It was what made us Catholic.
Now there is little or no difference, and it shows, in dropping attendance and dropping ordinations. It was our fixed doctrinal teaching that made us strong; it is our weak doctrinal teaching that is making us weak.
Go look at Progressivism and see where it's taking the whole world.
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)
Return to Latest News page
Return to HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Sun Jun 21 20:37:51 2015
From: alberta marie
Location: north port fl usa
None of this matters, be cause there are no ordained priests left.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
Your email is perfectly secure here. We use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
The purpose of this grouping of articles is to attack and refute perverted Catholicism, and to point the way back to Catholic orthodoxy and adherence to magisterial authority and teaching.
Refuting Perverted Catholicism
Opposing "soft" Catholicism, I'm OK - You're OK Catholicism, Cafeteria-Catholicism of the pick-and-choose variety, and the pure evil that seeks to pervert Catholicism from within, while wearing the mask of piety.
Refuting Perverted Catholicism: defending the Church as the Center of all Truth. Refuting Perverted Catholicism at the Layman Level. If proper Catholic catechesis dies, all is lost.
Has the USCCB morphed into the Catholicrat Party with it's own agenda? Our Democrat Party is now Maxocrat; our Republican Party is now Republicrat; has our USCCB gone Catholicrat?
On the Anti-Church metastasizing within the Roman Catholic hierarchy. The anti-Church within the Church: the anti-Papal agenda advancing even in the Vatican itself.
Babbling Christianity: The Loss of Unity in the Christian Message. Is some New Testament "Tower of Babble" moment behind babbling Christianity's ever increasing disunity?
Why is our whole culture going to pot? It's our morality, stupid. Every cultural thing - law, order, decency, indecency, salvation, damnation - hangs on a recognized cultural morality.
Can we find actual Evil inside the Catholic Church? Well, why not? The war between Satan's kingdom (the World) and the Kingdom of God, and Evil inside the Catholic Church.
The Modernist Heresy: Western Man's Descent from Philosophy into Modernism. Modernism is the heresy of heresies, because it carries within it all previous heresies, being as it is a direct, frontal assault upon faith and all doctrine and dogma.
Lucifer and the CCHD: The Catholic Campaign for Human Development.
Lucifer and the CCHD: how Lucifer’s disciples infected Catholic thinking, enjoyed Catholic funding and advanced evil in America.
The Catholic Communizer Dorothy Day is up for Sainthood? Excuse me?
The Catholic Communizer Dorothy Day’s life work was Marxist Community Organizing for future revolution.
The anti cafeteria Catholic forum is a thorn in the pew for Catholic wimps.
The anti cafeteria Catholic forum addresses weak-kneed, wimpy, inclusive, "Spirit of Vatican II" heterodox Catholicism. Refute these contentions if you can.
On Straying, Right or Left, from the Catechism.
We have before us, on one side, excesses of "Social Justice" and "Liberation Theology", and on the other, the "Lefebvre" movement and related groups. In the center: the Catechism.
Do our Catholic bishops promote and teach Roman Catholicism, or something less?
Cafeteria Catholicism, i.e., Pick-And-Choose Catholicism, is rampant in America, thanks to many American Catholic bishops.
(Cafeteria Catholicism 101)
My "Education" at the Athenaeum Of Ohio LPMP (Lay Pastoral Minstry Program).
The Athenaeum Of Ohio LPMP program was the required pre-requisite for entry into the Deaconate program in Archbishop Daniel E. Pylarczyk's Cincinnati Archdiocese.
(Cafeteria Catholic 1)
The hidden dissident agenda in the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP teaching.
The overriding dissident agenda of Liberal Catholicism appeared sometimes mostly in teaching material, sometimes in teachers themselves, sometimes in both.
(Cafeteria Catholic 2)
A better name for the LPMP's Formation for Discipleship class: Catholic Dissent.
The Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP course called Formation for Discipleship was one big long exercise in Catholic dissent, pure and simple.
(Cafeteria Catholic 3)
Moral Theology, Cincinnati Archdiocese style: This ain't your daddy's religion. Christian Ethics is the title of the course in the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP course on Catholic Moral Theology.
(Cafeteria Catholic 4)
Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP Christology Course: NOT about the Christ Who Rose Again.
This theoretically Catholic Christology course teaches about a Christ Who didn't know who he was, didn't necessarily rise again after death, but Who "teaches us valuable lessons" nonetheless.
(Cafeteria Catholic 5)
Athenaeum courses consistently taught that the early Church condoned slavery.
This teaching is clearly false. Yet the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP program, in multiple courses, officially taught that the Church "changed" its teaching on slavery.
The "Enlightened" birthing of Historical-Critical Scripture analysis.
Historical Criticism of the most paranormal literature ever produced calls into question the "enlightenment" of the enlightened.
Catholic Communism: Similarities between Church Hierarchy and Pure Bureaucracy.
Mises said that Communism equals Bureaucracy; the Church is a bureaucracy, therefore we have Catholic Communism. True?
Materialistic Culture Versus The Catholic Thinker.
The Catholic Thinker is called to openly oppose Materialistic Culture.
The Thinking Catholic Challenge: Walking that very inconvenient walk.
The Catholic American Thinker seeks a return to Critical Thinking, recognition of Objective Reality, and living a solid, morally grounded life.
Compromise with Evil begins the ultimate death spiral.
Compromise on any Vital Principle leads to death, for individual souls and for cultures.
On the Origin and Destiny of the American Catholic Identity Crisis. The ongoing 50+ year American Catholic identity crisis was born of a split between the Magisterium who protected it, and the academics who taught it.
Cafeteria Sinners: Selecting Mortal Sins from the Catholic Smorgasbord. Catholicism's Cafeteria Sinners pick and choose the mortal sins they will commit, and still participate in Eucharist.
Defining "Difficulty", "Doubt" and "Dissent" in Catholicism. Reactions to Doctrine(s) presenting difficulty, doubt and dissent among the faithful need examination.
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the