Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, Thursday,
October 29, 2015
This is about a reasoned argument going on regarding a three-way schism theoretically building within the Catholic Church. The main proponent or possible originator of this building schism theory is a fallen away Priest and dissident Catholic named Daniel McGuire, a theology and religious ethics professor at Marquette University.
I know; I know; but these days, it is more normal than not that a fallen away priest and dissident Catholic would be the main guy teaching theology and religious ethics at a Catholic Jesuit University. Times have changed. That's what the Jesuits have come to, and that's what "Catholic" higher education has come to in America, and perhaps in the world. Mustn't discriminate; heavens no. Satan himself should be welcome to teach Christian theology and morality in Catholic teaching institutions. Who are we to sit in judgment of him?
Still, we have the reasoned argument before us, and it is not entirely without merit. It was written about by Margery Eagan at CruxNow.com/CatholicJudaism and by Rev Dwight Longenecker at CruxNow.com/CatholicBreakup. The argument stirred thought here because of the whole area of related argumentation among the many Winnowing Pages, in which experience and history reinforce the notion of a "natural" recurring three-way split on human religious/political opinions. Whether this phenomenon is natural, i.e., of God, or due to the machinations of the Tempter I will leave to the more spiritually attuned to determine. But it is always observable.
Professor McGuire, in response to Pope Francis' easing of the Catholic process of Marriage Annulment spoke of how the change of rules was important to only some Catholics, but not all. He likened the three-way split, already present among the Catholic hierarchy and laity alike, to follow the lines of the three-way split in our parent religion, Judaism. Today there are Reformed, Conservative and Orthodox divisions within Judaism. While these are not yet formalized within Catholicism, McGuire seems to be predicting an eventual three-way Great Catholic Schism along similar lines.
In his view, the annulment rule changes were important to the Orthodox and Conservative Catholic divisions, but not to the Reformed division. Because the Reformed division had already displaced or discounted the magisterial authority of the Church. As he puts it, their consciences are their Vatican. And if that is true, then, obviously, their consciences are not properly formed. And, we should not expect Catholic consciences to be universally properly formed in any culture in which "Catholic" teachers like McGuire are allowed to help form Catholic consciences.
In 2006 McGuire published a "Catholic" defense of same sex "marriage", in which he declared, "We have no moral right to declare marriage off limits to people whom God has made gay." Which tells us that he believes - or perhaps that he wants others to believe - that God makes people homosexual.
Right. God did it. The Tempter had nothing to do with it. Other homosexuals, acting in the service of the Tempter, had nothing to do with it. Fallen-away dissident teachers in Catholic teaching institutions had nothing to do with it. Frankfurt-School educated Cultural-Marxist teachers in public and even Catholic teaching institutions had nothing to do with it. Gramsci-Marxism had nothing to do with it. McGuire would have us believe that God makes homosexuals, which is to say that homosexuality is Natural. Right.
It just doesn't get any dumber than this. No one is born this stupid. You have to be educated into it. Professor McGuire proves that the education establishment is up to the task.
Here is how Professor McGuire describes his three-way Catholic schism:
Fr. Longenecker sees these three "tribes" within Catholicism, sure enough, but he identifies them somewhat differently, as follows:
Fr. Longenecker sees these groups as semi-permanent divisions within the Church, not future schismatic sects. Obviously, to be schismatic is to leave the Church, and to relinquish the title "Catholic", at least to relinquish it in all honesty. He goes on to name quite a long list of schismatic "Catholic" cults in existence today, most of which I was totally unaware of. But, he points out, they are not Catholic, in the true sense of that word. And if the Church broke into three, only the one with the Pope in it would remain Catholic; the others would be something else.
I have long held that there is only one proper name for Western Culture Christians who do not recognize the authority of the Pope, and that proper name is Protestant.
Bottom line, there is one Revelation and one Church; the Revelation does not change, and neither does the authority Christ bestowed upon His chosen Apostles and their successors. It is by His authority after all, and He is Who He is, saying "He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters." -Matt 12:30; Luke 11:23. When He commissioned His Apostles and gave them their teaching authority, He said "He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me". -Luke 10:16. You would think that would be clear enough, even for the over-educated. But it isn't.
We can all look around ourselves, whatever our station in life, whatever our vocation, and we can see "Catholics" who claim the title, but do not live the life. Including public figures. Sean Hannity is a good example. He does not hesitate to identify as Catholic, and, he does not hesitate to identify Catholic doctrine he willingly disagrees with and violates. On the radio and/or TV. So, according to this three-way split, he is one of those whose Magisterium, or whose Vatican, or whose sole Catholic Authority, is his own improperly formed conscience. He is what used to be called a Cafeteria Catholic, and what Professor McGuire would call a Reformed Catholic. One who puts his subjective feelings above objective truth. If he doesn't feel it's a sin, then it isn't really a sin, for him. See?
Fr. Longenecker, in his article, pronounced what was for me a stirring, deep, profundity, regarding the three dividing issues of Difficulty, Doubt and Dissent. To quote:
Revealed Truth ain't up for a vote, and it's not affected in the least by feelings or consciences, however formed. It remains Revealed Truth. And the successors of Peter and the Apostles do not simply act on their own; they have an Advocate. "But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you." -John 14:26.
Yet we have these Catholic divisions. If the Church Christ founded does not speak with one, clear voice, and if all the Bishops do not teach the one, clear Truth, from the one, clear Catechism, then, how are we Catholics any different than Protestantism's thousands of denominations?
Truth is inconvenient. So is Catholicism. That's the way it is.
We cannot hope to get American politics right until we get predominant American morality right, and we cannot get American morality right until and unless we get our American faith right. And if Catholicism does not properly lead the way, and shine the light of Truth on the path, we are all going to go off in the wrong direction(s). That's called scattering. Disorder displacing good order.
That is the real source of my worries for America.
His will be done.
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)
Return to Latest News page
Return to HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Language and Tone Statement
Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our
standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is.
If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elite Culturally Marxist Authoritarians will never tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their own pro-Marxist/anti-Christian/anti-American/Globalist/anti-Nation/immoral/anti-white/racist and bigoted point of view.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
Your email is perfectly secure here. We use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
The purpose of this grouping of articles is to attack and refute perverted Catholicism, and to point the way back to Catholic orthodoxy and adherence to magisterial authority and teaching.
Refuting Perverted Catholicism
Opposing "soft" Catholicism, I'm OK - You're OK Catholicism, Cafeteria-Catholicism of the pick-and-choose variety, and the pure evil that seeks to pervert Catholicism from within, while wearing the mask of piety.
Refuting Perverted Catholicism: defending the Church as the Center of all Truth. Refuting Perverted Catholicism at the Layman Level. If proper Catholic catechesis dies, all is lost.
Has the USCCB morphed into the Catholicrat Party with it's own agenda? Our Democrat Party is now Maxocrat; our Republican Party is now Republicrat; has our USCCB gone Catholicrat?
On the Anti-Church metastasizing within the Roman Catholic hierarchy. The anti-Church within the Church: the anti-Papal agenda advancing even in the Vatican itself.
Babbling Christianity: The Loss of Unity in the Christian Message. Is some New Testament "Tower of Babble" moment behind babbling Christianity's ever increasing disunity?
Why is our whole culture going to pot? It's our morality, stupid. Every cultural thing - law, order, decency, indecency, salvation, damnation - hangs on a recognized cultural morality.
Can we find actual Evil inside the Catholic Church? Well, why not? The war between Satan's kingdom (the World) and the Kingdom of God, and Evil inside the Catholic Church.
The Modernist Heresy: Western Man's Descent from Philosophy into Modernism. Modernism is the heresy of heresies, because it carries within it all previous heresies, being as it is a direct, frontal assault upon faith and all doctrine and dogma.
Lucifer and the CCHD: The Catholic Campaign for Human Development.
Lucifer and the CCHD: how Lucifer’s disciples infected Catholic thinking, enjoyed Catholic funding and advanced evil in America.
The Catholic Communizer Dorothy Day is up for Sainthood? Excuse me?
The Catholic Communizer Dorothy Day’s life work was Marxist Community Organizing for future revolution.
The anti cafeteria Catholic forum is a thorn in the pew for Catholic wimps.
The anti cafeteria Catholic forum addresses weak-kneed, wimpy, inclusive, "Spirit of Vatican II" heterodox Catholicism. Refute these contentions if you can.
On Straying, Right or Left, from the Catechism.
We have before us, on one side, excesses of "Social Justice" and "Liberation Theology", and on the other, the "Lefebvre" movement and related groups. In the center: the Catechism.
Do our Catholic bishops promote and teach Roman Catholicism, or something less?
Cafeteria Catholicism, i.e., Pick-And-Choose Catholicism, is rampant in America, thanks to many American Catholic bishops.
(Cafeteria Catholicism 101)
My "Education" at the Athenaeum Of Ohio LPMP (Lay Pastoral Minstry Program).
The Athenaeum Of Ohio LPMP program was the required pre-requisite for entry into the Deaconate program in Archbishop Daniel E. Pylarczyk's Cincinnati Archdiocese.
(Cafeteria Catholic 1)
The hidden dissident agenda in the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP teaching.
The overriding dissident agenda of Liberal Catholicism appeared sometimes mostly in teaching material, sometimes in teachers themselves, sometimes in both.
(Cafeteria Catholic 2)
A better name for the LPMP's Formation for Discipleship class: Catholic Dissent.
The Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP course called Formation for Discipleship was one big long exercise in Catholic dissent, pure and simple.
(Cafeteria Catholic 3)
Moral Theology, Cincinnati Archdiocese style: This ain't your daddy's religion. Christian Ethics is the title of the course in the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP course on Catholic Moral Theology.
(Cafeteria Catholic 4)
Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP Christology Course: NOT about the Christ Who Rose Again.
This theoretically Catholic Christology course teaches about a Christ Who didn't know who he was, didn't necessarily rise again after death, but Who "teaches us valuable lessons" nonetheless.
(Cafeteria Catholic 5)
Athenaeum courses consistently taught that the early Church condoned slavery.
This teaching is clearly false. Yet the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP program, in multiple courses, officially taught that the Church "changed" its teaching on slavery.
The "Enlightened" birthing of Historical-Critical Scripture analysis.
Historical Criticism of the most paranormal literature ever produced calls into question the "enlightenment" of the enlightened.
Catholic Communism: Similarities between Church Hierarchy and Pure Bureaucracy.
Mises said that Communism equals Bureaucracy; the Church is a bureaucracy, therefore we have Catholic Communism. True?
Materialistic Culture Versus The Catholic Thinker.
The Catholic Thinker is called to openly oppose Materialistic Culture.
The Thinking Catholic Challenge: Walking that very inconvenient walk.
The Catholic American Thinker seeks a return to Critical Thinking, recognition of Objective Reality, and living a solid, morally grounded life.
Compromise with Evil begins the ultimate death spiral.
Compromise on any Vital Principle leads to death, for individual souls and for cultures.
On the Origin and Destiny of the American Catholic Identity Crisis. The ongoing 50+ year American Catholic identity crisis was born of a split between the Magisterium who protected it, and the academics who taught it.
Cafeteria Sinners: Selecting Mortal Sins from the Catholic Smorgasbord. Catholicism's Cafeteria Sinners pick and choose the mortal sins they will commit, and still participate in Eucharist.
Defining "Difficulty", "Doubt" and "Dissent" in Catholicism. Reactions to Doctrine(s) presenting difficulty, doubt and dissent among the faithful need examination.
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the