Shop for thousands of Catholic gifts at Aquinas and More/affiliate/ThinkingCath1376
SiteSell Hosting

Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.

Mitochondrial Eve & Y-Chromosomal Adam v Darwinism and the "Natural" Homo.

If all human DNA traces back to Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosomal Adam, then the religion of Darwinism and the "Naturalness" of the homosexual condition are both refuted.

Vic Biorseth, Sunday, April 02, 2017
http://www.CatholicAmericanThinker.com/

Note that the Catholic Church makes no definitive statement regarding either the validity of Evolutionary Theory or the validity of Creationism, one way or the other.  Atheism, however, does indeed make not only definitive but belligerent and unreasoned statements about both

The never proven, strictly faith-based, yet belligerently insisted upon "science" of Darwinism insists that Speciation occurs when the "fittest" among a species population in an environment successfully reproduce among themselves but can no longer successfully interbreed with the parent species.  They become, therefore, a new species. 

Note the plurality.  The fittest among a population.  This means a group of organisms (in this case humans) became so disassociated with their parents that they could no longer successfully breed with other humans from the parent species.  But they could reproduce with each other. Those (plural) that are the fittest mate more successfully and produce like offspring inheriting the "fittest" qualities.

But, this is disproved by the fact that the DNA points back to an Adam and an Eve.  One and only one of each. 

Early American Darwinists of the Democrat Party of Secession from the USA over the black slavery issue were convinced that black people were not human, but of another inferior species.   Not true; the DNA of black people traces back to the exact same one and only Adam and Eve.  We are all of the same species and the same ancient parentage.  We are all related.  And we can all interbreed successfully.  Interbreeding is quite impossible between different species. 

It appears to be the same situation with animals and plants bred by man.  Animal husbandry and agricultural science have never produced any new species.  Different breeds of cows are still cows; different types of wheat are still wheat; etc., etc., etc.  No new successfully reproducing species that can no longer reproduce with its parent species has ever been bred by man. 

No speciation event has ever been observed by man, either in living human history or in the ancient fossil record. 

None of Darwin's observations in the Galapagos Islands or anywhere else involved any new species.  All the unsual finches were still finches; all the marine iguanas were still iguanas; etc., etc., etc.  The same with all of his given human-bred speciation examples; woollier breeds of sheep were all still sheep, different breeds of dogs were all still dogs, etc. 

Which brings us to the homo question.  Why was Eve a woman, and why was Adam a man?  What was the natural purpose of their female and male genitalia?  (Hint:  You are here reading these words.) 

How would we all be here if the "normal" and "natural" sexual activity of human beings involved one sex only, or the achievement of any form of perverse non-reproductive sexual gratification? 

We wouldn't be here. 

Not preaching; just some simple common sense things to think about. 



=====

Hover-Link Footnotes:  For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links.  (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)

SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
GESGOEAEOT2 Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time
PEWAG3 Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild Assed Guess
TTRSTF4 Them There Real Scientifical Type Fellers
TTRSPTF5 Them There Real Smart Perfesser Type Fellers
TTRSJTF6 Them There Real Smart Journalistical Type Fellers
SNRTACBT7 Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today
STNSEACPB8 Surely Today No Serious, Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe
WDN9 We Don't Know
BMDFP10 Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs
HBAACOTE11 Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth
ACLU12 Anti-Christian Litigation Union
FLORMPORIF13 Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool
MEJTML14 Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
IEJTML15 Islamic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar
MPAV16 Marxist Principles And Values
WBESSWG17 Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance
TRMITM18 The Reason Man's In This Mess
IYI19 Intellectual Yet Idiotic

Reference Material

Return to Latest News page

Return to HOME PAGE

Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment

Comments

Respond to this specific article immediately below.  Or,
publish your own new subject Web Page.  Or,
publish your own unrelated brief Passing Thought.


Date:  Sun Apr 02 21:55:21 2017
From:  Mike Gent
Email:   mikeg751@yahoo.com
Location:  Saratoga Springs/NY/US of A
Comment: 

I love this stuff.  My youngest son is such a Darwin idolater that I have difficulty talking to him.  Give me more of this, because he spouts a scientific mumbo-jumbo which I have a hard time disputing with any scientific facts.  He is so arrogant in his "facts" that the discussions become fights. 

In other words, I ain't no G. K. Chesterton.


Date:  Mon Apr 03 2017
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Mike:

Me neither. 

You might point him to all of The Darwinism Pages, beginning with the Refuting Darwin's Origin of Species page.  Despite universally taught formal education here and all over the world, none of Darwinism has ever been substantiated with any real scientific evidences. 

Someone in the IDVolution website published a paper a while back showing how each of us human beings is a mutant.  A mutation.  And how all mutants have less genetic material than their parents, never more.  Which points to becoming more simple, not more complex, over generations.  And that, if correct, is in perfect alignment with the third law of thermodynamics, which says that things become more simple over time, not more complex. 

Things break down

Devolution, in other words, rather than Evolution. 

Darwinism is little more than a very convenient, although fraudulent, foundational basis for the unprovable faith of atheism

Regards,

Vic


Date:  Thu Apr 06 19:12:25 2017
From:  Eric Bermingham
Email:   eric.bermingham@fuse
Location:  Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Comment: 

In your April 3, 2017 post on Adam and Eve you said: "Note that the Catholic Church makes no definitive statement regarding either the validity of Evolutionary Theory or the validity of Creationism, one way or the other."

However, Pope Leo XIII in his 1880 encyclical Arcanum (On Christian Marriage - paragraph five) said: "We record what is to all known, and cannot be doubted by any, that God, on the sixth day of creation, having made man from the slime of the earth, and having breathed into his face the breath of life, gave him a companion, whom He miraculously took from the side of Adam when he was locked in sleep."

That sounds definitive to me.


Date:  Fri Apr 07 2017
From:  Vic Biorseth
Comment:  

Eric:

The term Creationsim refers to the current day Science of Creationism, not to Genesis.  Creationism seeks to gather empirical evidences with which to scientifically prove Genesis, something I believe is beyond the ability of man to do.  It is Creation Science, not Genesis, that the Church makes no definitive statement on. 

It would appear from Scripture that man arrived on the scene with spoken language.  However, it may have been quite some time before man had written language, and the ability to record history, rather than to repeatedly recite it from memory to keep it alive and pass it on from generation to generation. 

Quite some bit of time must have past after Creation before the sacred authors even attempted to write it all down.  By that time, the two competing stories were Genesis 1 and Genesis 2, which were given equal weight by the inspired authors, and therefore both were included in Genesis. 

The Church has made general definitive statements regarding the conclusions drawn from research into material beginnings, without getting into scientific specifics. 

From Vatican I, on Faith and Reason:

9. Hence all faithful Christians are forbidden to defend as the legitimate conclusions of science those opinions which are known to be contrary to the doctrine of faith, particularly if they have been condemned by the Church; and furthermore they are absolutely bound to hold them to be errors which wear the deceptive appearance of truth. ...

10. Not only can faith and reason never be at odds with one another but they mutually support each other, for on the one hand right reason established the foundations of the faith and, illuminated by its light, develops the science of divine things; on the other hand, faith delivers reason from errors and protects it and furnishes it with knowledge of many kinds.

And on God the Creator:

On God the creator of all things

  1. If anyone denies the one true God, creator and lord of things visible and invisible: let him be anathema.
  2. If anyone is so bold as to assert that there exists nothing besides matter: let him be anathema.
  3. If anyone says that the substance or essence of God and that of all things are one and the same: let him be anathema.
  4. If anyone says that finite things, both corporal and spiritual, or at any rate, spiritual, emanated from the divine substance; or that the divine essence, by the manifestation and evolution of itself becomes all things or, finally, that God is a universal or indefinite being which by self-determination establishes the totality of things distinct in genera, species and individuals: let him be anathema.
  5. If anyone does not confess that the world and all things which are contained in it, both spiritual and material, were produced, according to their whole substance, out of nothing by God; or holds that God did not create by his will free from all necessity, but as necessarily as he necessarily loves himself; or denies that the world was created for the glory of God: let him be anathema.

This was less to specifically anathematize either Evolution or Creationism than to anathematize

  • Materialism - the belief that Material is all that there is.
  • Pantheism - that God and the Universe are One.
  • Dualism - that God is not the sole creator, because all Matter is erroneously held to be evil.

These are erroneous conclusions that may be drawn from straying too far from Revealed Truth.  Revealed Truth sets the limits for right reason, to keep man from going off into nonsense, or even into evil. 

Regards,

Vic


Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders.  While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our standards of logical rigor and civil discourse.  We will not participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely trading insults.  Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged.  If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will not be published here.  If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil.  We humbly apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is. 

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information.  Elite Culturally Marxist Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their own rigid pro-Marxist/anti-Christian/anti-American/Globalist/anti-Nation/immoral/anti-white/racist and bigoted point of view. 

Add Your Comment

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Please enter the word that you see below.

  


Copyrighted Material


Your Host, Vic Biorseth

Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. 

Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here.  Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
Newsletter
and nothing else.

Back Issues

Keep This Website Going

Related WebPages

The Purpose of this group of links is to provide a repository for articles pertaining to the open fraud of Darwinian Evolution.

The Darwinism Pages
Natural Evolution of Species theory remains untested and even unobserved today, with no physical evidence supporting it, and must therefore be recognized as little more than an ideology, a silly superstition or a false religion.

Mitochondrial Eve & Y-Chromosomal Adam v Darwinism and the "Natural" Homo.  If all human DNA traces back to Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosomal Adam, then the religion of Darwinism and the "Naturalness" of the homosexual condition are both refuted.

Did the breakdown and loss of the Scientific-Method begin with Darwinism?  In the Evolutionary Trail of Modern Scientism, Marxism points back to Freudianism, and farther back to Darwinism.  Was that where Modern Man initially took Science off the rails?

Refuting Darwin and Dawinian “science” as bunk and silliness. Refuting Darwin is almost too easy due to his rush-to-publish and his complete lack of empirical evidences.

Refuting the Origin Of Species pseudo-scientific theory of Darwinism. If Darwinism’s Origin Of Species is a true Scientific Theory then there must be a preponderance of evidences supporting it. Show us any of it.

The definition of Darwinism in a nutshell. In the definition of Darwinism we find the foundational principles upon which the quest for the atheist holy grail: the purely material origin of life itself.

Darwinism: Darwin, Evolution, and the Devolution of the Scientific Method. Scientistic Materialism's cornerstone: Darwinism and the competing sub-theories of Gradualism and Punctuated Equilibrium.

Radiocarbon dating as an aging method is accurate up to a point. Radiocarbon dating is reliable up to 6,000 years, shaky at best up to 40,000 years, and completely useless beyond 70,000 years.

Silly premises built on crumbling foundations: Global Villageism & Evolutionism. The Dem Global-Villagers insist the US Constitution was written to cover all citizens of Earth; Disciples of Scientism and Evolutionism all genuflect before their high priest, Richard Dawkins.

Faith versus Atheism: Is atheism really just a silly superstition? The Faith versus Atheism argument is at the root of every other important argument.

On Evil and Nonsense: Look closely at Nonsense, and find Evil at its root. Evil and Nonsense: deny evil and you deny right vs. wrong; which is to deny common sense, which is to invoke nonsense.

Genetic Entropy: Pointing to Human Devolution, not Evolution.  Genetic Entropy shows that mutants have less genetic material for variation, never more, falsifying evolution via "favorable" mutation.

Charles Darwin, the Monkey Man.  Click here for a refutation of his so-called “scientific theory,” which has never even been subjected to the scientific method.

Refuting the false theology, doctrines and dogmas of Darwinism

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization  make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor.  It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Traditional Latin Tridentine Mass, offered at Assumption Grotto Church in  Detroit, Michigan.  Our deepest prayer, our highest form of worship, and the way God should be treated.

Find a Latin Mass

The Vietnam War Proved the American News Media's Treacherous Anti-American Marxism.
Note the Military Assault Rifle common to the American Founding Era.

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

(See The Darwinism Pages)

If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the
SITE MAP.