Back to Back Issues Page
What does normalized, mainstreamed, open homosexuality say about us as a people?
June 03, 2009
Subscribers Newsletter

The argument against open homosexuality.

Vic Biorseth, Wednesday, June 03, 2009

How, exactly, did we ever get to this point?

The hot political topic du jour involves the creation of a new right to “gay” marriage being established in American civil law. We already have a new genre of “gay rights” laws in existence, even in the absence of any special “straight rights” laws. Homosexuals are extra special; homosexuals need new civil rights the rest of us don’t get. Only the special rights of homosexuals are to be protected by law; the rest of us don’t get any special rights, let alone any special protections of our existing rights, or any special sympathy or empathy for our choices in how we live our lives, or for our chosen sexual practices.

Homosexuals are not to be considered “haters” if they criticize or mock the lifestyles of heterosexuals, or even physically attack heterosexuals. Hate crimes are strictly one-way crimes, enacted for special groups or classes or races of citizens only, but not for the rest of us, and certainly not for the majority. It has become another area of institutionalized class strife and government mandated class animosity and class warfare in America. The Socialists love it. I mean the Democrats.

A right is guaranteed by law; an opportunity is something taken, or not taken, by a citizen. Protecting a legal right is the duty of government; taking advantage of an opportunity is the sole responsibility of a citizen. A citizen right is a legal thing; an opportunity is a free-choice thing.

We submit that, in America, there is not one single legal right that a heterosexual person enjoys that a homosexual person does not also enjoy, and that there never was. I have a right to marry a person of the opposite sex; so does any homosexual. The fact that the homosexual chooses or prefers to marry a person of the same sex leads to the rather silly notion that he ought to have a right established in law to enable that choice. Accomplishing the legal establishment of that arbitrary choice of the homosexual person as a new right under the law must, by its very nature, entail a legal redefinition of the normative family, and the family is the primal social unit. Society is built on families. As the family goes, so goes the whole culture. That’s just a social fact.

Until now, the law has had no need to look further into the details of the normative family makeup, because it has always been “known” to consist of a man, a woman and their children, and any orphans, widows or unfortunates adopted into the family. It has always been so clear and obvious that there was no need to look any closer at it. Until now. And now, having started down this path, we need to ask where it is going. If homosexuals can form a married union under civil law, then, why not threesomes? Why not foursomes? Why not siblings? Why can’t a girl marry an aircraft carrier? What about pedophiles; shouldn’t they be able to marry their little victims?

Until very recent history, in the West, homosexuality has been hidden in the gutter alongside adultery, fornication, incest and other forms of sexual licensuousness. But now it has become the “in” fad among celebrities and pseudo-sophisticates, and the movement to promote open public faggotry has made inroads in all parts of American culture, including even a few major Christian denominations. We are hammered with false statistics that say that 10 or more percent of us are homosexual, with nothing whatsoever to back that false claim up. It was born of the sick, demented Kinsey Report that we spoke of on the Freudianism page, and which has been thoroughly refuted. Nowhere near 10 percent choose a homosexual lifestyle.

It gets worse. There are movements to promote homosexual adoption of children, and it’s already being done. Not only are other people’s children being increasingly indoctrinated in public schools about the goodness and normalcy of homosexuality, but now innocent orphan children are being let out for adoption into homes in which they will live and be raised under the specter of sodomy and perversion under new names, and it’s all blessed by civil law.

So a tiny minority in America, perhaps two or three percent, has gained a huge spotlight for itself, garnered pity and sympathy everywhere, and is now able to brow-beat the majority into complying with a ridiculous agenda of advancing its cause, with the Democrat Party doing all the heavy lifting. If you think the outcome of this ongoing battle will have no affect on you personally, you are wrong. It will adversely affect all of society, and society is where you live, and where your children will grow up.

I’m not going to go over ground I’ve gone over before and belabor the usual false premises put forth by the homosexual culture in their promotion of open public faggotry everywhere. See the Homo-Nazi page if you want to go over it again. Essentially, the lies involve how the homo can’t help himself because he was born homo; homos just have to have perverted sex, because, well, they just have to, and chastity is not an option for them as it is for normal people. All lies. As is the HIV=AIDS=Death Hoax lie that is still being used to elevate homosexuals to some kind of hero status.

But, the argument goes, the homosexual couple who are committed to each other in a loving relationship should be able to live and operate the same as a heterosexual couple. It is a false argument. See the Homo-Nazi page for the details; essentially, a homosexual “committed relationship” doesn’t last too long, when compared to the heterosexual variant. Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous. Even long lasting relationships are episodically interrupted by bouts of infidelity, which may be forgiven, or not. Homosexuals are far, far more promiscuous and licentious than heterosexuals. That’s just the way it is. Actual statistics are backed up by much higher disease rates.

The public school homosexual indoctrination books “Heather Has Two Mommies” and “Daddy’s New Roommate” would be more accurately and more honestly titled “Heather Has Two Step-Mommies, Three Ex-Mommies and an Ex-Daddy” and “Daddy’s Fifth New Roommate.” If you think normal marriage divorce rates are bad and getting worse, you haven’t even looked at the same rates for the homos. What happens to adopted kids? Homosexual “divorce” means custody battles, most usually ending in neither party keeping them. They usually go back to the foster parents, the orphanage or wherever they came from. Somewhat the worse for wear.

Again, I must ask:

How did we ever get to this point? We are a Western culture descended from the history of Western Civilization. Our cultural morality, our collective sense of right and wrong, even our basis for our American Constitution and American civil law, comes straight out of our Judao-Christian Ethos. Our identifying ethos came out of our common religion, which the overwhelming majority of us still claim, to this day, to hold to. See the Catholic Thinker page for the symbiotic relationship between Old Testament morality, New Testament morality, and American civil law.

This is our very foundation, as a people. Our morality comes from our religion.

When someone said, put your religion aside for a minute, if we were stupid enough to do that, did we remember to pick it up again afterward? Or is our religion still somewhere out there on the sidelines, and no longer a crucial part of our lives. Have we come to the point where we only pick up our religion again on the way into Church or Synagogue, and then drop it on the sideline again after the services are over? We claim, in our overwhelming majority, to be religious people. Have we, too, become liars?

Let’s look at what our religion teaches on the subject. Here is only a partial, cursory gathering of prohibitions against homosexuality.

[Lev 18:22] You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

[ [Deut 22:5] "A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman's garment; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God.

[ [Rom 1:24-27] Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen. For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error.

[ [1 Tim 1:8-11] Now we know that the law is good, if any one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, immoral persons, sodomites, kidnapers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the glorious gospel of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.

[ [2 Pet 2:4-10] For if God did not spare the angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to pits of nether gloom to be kept until the judgment; if he did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah, a herald of righteousness, with seven other persons, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly; if by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomor'rah to ashes he condemned them to extinction and made them an example to those who were to be ungodly; and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by the licentiousness of the wicked (for by what that righteous man saw and heard as he lived among them, he was vexed in his righteous soul day after day with their lawless deeds), then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trial, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment, and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority.

[ [Jude 1:5-8] Now I desire to remind you, though you were once for all fully informed, that he who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels that did not keep their own position but left their proper dwelling have been kept by him in eternal chains in the nether gloom until the judgment of the great day; just as Sodom and Gomor'rah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. Yet in like manner these men in their dreamings defile the flesh, reject authority, and revile the glorious ones.

[ [Wis 14:23-26] For whether they kill children in their initiations, or celebrate secret mysteries, or hold frenzied revels with strange customs, they no longer keep either their lives or their marriages pure, but they either treacherously kill one another, or grieve one another by adultery, and all is a raging riot of blood and murder, theft and deceit, corruption, faithlessness, tumult, perjury, confusion over what is good, forgetfulness of favors, pollution of souls, sex perversion, disorder in marriage, adultery, and debauchery.

[ [1 Cor 6:9-10] Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.

There’s really nothing complicated about this. It’s just gone too far. We have turned our faces too far away from God and His Word, and for too long. We have allowed an alien “morality” to invade our psyches and even our laws. It has come to the point of Orwellian “Newspeak” language in usage, in which bad is good, good is bad, and everybody has lost track of the reality of the issue. This is not our morality speaking most loudly in public here today.

It is the morality of BMDFP and the Democrat Party. It is supported by the SLIMC, and by leading academics everywhere, and by a thundering herd of TTRSTF, who all agree, and swear that all the hype, numbers and falsehoods are true.

Nevertheless, these lies are not true. Nothing has changed. We need to turn our faces back toward God.

One face at a time.

Respond to this article at the link below :
Open Homosexuality

This article and comments may be found on the web site at the link below :

Back to Back Issues Page