|Back to Back Issues Page|
What does normalized, mainstreamed, open homosexuality say about us as a people?
June 03, 2009
The argument against open homosexuality.
Vic Biorseth, Wednesday, June 03, 2009
How, exactly, did we ever get to this point?
The hot political topic du jour involves the creation of a new right to “gay” marriage being established in American civil law. We already have a new genre of “gay rights” laws in existence, even in the absence of any special “straight rights” laws. Homosexuals are extra special; homosexuals need new civil rights the rest of us don’t get. Only the special rights of homosexuals are to be protected by law; the rest of us don’t get any special rights, let alone any special protections of our existing rights, or any special sympathy or empathy for our choices in how we live our lives, or for our chosen sexual practices.
Homosexuals are not to be considered “haters” if they criticize or mock the lifestyles of heterosexuals, or even physically attack heterosexuals. Hate crimes are strictly one-way crimes, enacted for special groups or classes or races of citizens only, but not for the rest of us, and certainly not for the majority. It has become another area of institutionalized class strife and government mandated class animosity and class warfare in America. The Socialists love it. I mean the Democrats.
A right is guaranteed by law; an opportunity is something taken, or not taken, by a citizen. Protecting a legal right is the duty of government; taking advantage of an opportunity is the sole responsibility of a citizen. A citizen right is a legal thing; an opportunity is a free-choice thing.
We submit that, in America, there is not one single legal right that a heterosexual person enjoys that a homosexual person does not also enjoy, and that there never was. I have a right to marry a person of the opposite sex; so does any homosexual. The fact that the homosexual chooses or prefers to marry a person of the same sex leads to the rather silly notion that he ought to have a right established in law to enable that choice. Accomplishing the legal establishment of that arbitrary choice of the homosexual person as a new right under the law must, by its very nature, entail a legal redefinition of the normative family, and the family is the primal social unit. Society is built on families. As the family goes, so goes the whole culture. That’s just a social fact.
Until now, the law has had no need to look further into the details of the normative family makeup, because it has always been “known” to consist of a man, a woman and their children, and any orphans, widows or unfortunates adopted into the family. It has always been so clear and obvious that there was no need to look any closer at it. Until now. And now, having started down this path, we need to ask where it is going. If homosexuals can form a married union under civil law, then, why not threesomes? Why not foursomes? Why not siblings? Why can’t a girl marry an aircraft carrier? What about pedophiles; shouldn’t they be able to marry their little victims?
Until very recent history, in the West, homosexuality has been hidden in the gutter alongside adultery, fornication, incest and other forms of sexual licensuousness. But now it has become the “in” fad among celebrities and pseudo-sophisticates, and the movement to promote open public faggotry has made inroads in all parts of American culture, including even a few major Christian denominations. We are hammered with false statistics that say that 10 or more percent of us are homosexual, with nothing whatsoever to back that false claim up. It was born of the sick, demented Kinsey Report that we spoke of on the Freudianism page, and which has been thoroughly refuted. Nowhere near 10 percent choose a homosexual lifestyle.
It gets worse. There are movements to promote homosexual adoption of children, and it’s already being done. Not only are other people’s children being increasingly indoctrinated in public schools about the goodness and normalcy of homosexuality, but now innocent orphan children are being let out for adoption into homes in which they will live and be raised under the specter of sodomy and perversion under new names, and it’s all blessed by civil law.
So a tiny minority in America, perhaps two or three percent, has gained a huge spotlight for itself, garnered pity and sympathy everywhere, and is now able to brow-beat the majority into complying with a ridiculous agenda of advancing its cause, with the Democrat Party doing all the heavy lifting. If you think the outcome of this ongoing battle will have no affect on you personally, you are wrong. It will adversely affect all of society, and society is where you live, and where your children will grow up.
I’m not going to go over ground I’ve gone over before and belabor the usual false premises put forth by the homosexual culture in their promotion of open public faggotry everywhere. See the Homo-Nazi page if you want to go over it again. Essentially, the lies involve how the homo can’t help himself because he was born homo; homos just have to have perverted sex, because, well, they just have to, and chastity is not an option for them as it is for normal people. All lies. As is the HIV=AIDS=Death Hoax lie that is still being used to elevate homosexuals to some kind of hero status.
But, the argument goes, the homosexual couple who are committed to each other in a loving relationship should be able to live and operate the same as a heterosexual couple. It is a false argument. See the Homo-Nazi page for the details; essentially, a homosexual “committed relationship” doesn’t last too long, when compared to the heterosexual variant. Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous. Even long lasting relationships are episodically interrupted by bouts of infidelity, which may be forgiven, or not. Homosexuals are far, far more promiscuous and licentious than heterosexuals. That’s just the way it is. Actual statistics are backed up by much higher disease rates.
The public school homosexual indoctrination books “Heather Has Two Mommies” and “Daddy’s New Roommate” would be more accurately and more honestly titled “Heather Has Two Step-Mommies, Three Ex-Mommies and an Ex-Daddy” and “Daddy’s Fifth New Roommate.” If you think normal marriage divorce rates are bad and getting worse, you haven’t even looked at the same rates for the homos. What happens to adopted kids? Homosexual “divorce” means custody battles, most usually ending in neither party keeping them. They usually go back to the foster parents, the orphanage or wherever they came from. Somewhat the worse for wear.
Again, I must ask:
How did we ever get to this point?
How did we ever get to this point?We are a Western culture descended from the history of Western Civilization. Our cultural morality, our collective sense of right and wrong, even our basis for our American Constitution and American civil law, comes straight out of our Judao-Christian Ethos. Our identifying ethos came out of our common religion, which the overwhelming majority of us still claim, to this day, to hold to. See the Catholic Thinker page for the symbiotic relationship between Old Testament morality, New Testament morality, and American civil law.
This is our very foundation, as a people. Our morality comes from our religion.
When someone said, put your religion aside for a minute, if we were stupid enough to do that, did we remember to pick it up again afterward? Or is our religion still somewhere out there on the sidelines, and no longer a crucial part of our lives. Have we come to the point where we only pick up our religion again on the way into Church or Synagogue, and then drop it on the sideline again after the services are over? We claim, in our overwhelming majority, to be religious people. Have we, too, become liars?
Let’s look at what our religion teaches on the subject. Here is only a partial, cursory gathering of prohibitions against homosexuality.
There’s really nothing complicated about this. It’s just gone too far. We have turned our faces too far away from God and His Word, and for too long. We have allowed an alien “morality” to invade our psyches and even our laws. It has come to the point of Orwellian “Newspeak” language in usage, in which bad is good, good is bad, and everybody has lost track of the reality of the issue. This is not our morality speaking most loudly in public here today.
It is the morality of BMDFP and the Democrat Party. It is supported by the SLIMC, and by leading academics everywhere, and by a thundering herd of TTRSTF, who all agree, and swear that all the hype, numbers and falsehoods are true.
Nevertheless, these lies are not true. Nothing has changed. We need to turn our faces back toward God.
One face at a time.
Respond to this article at the link below :
This article and comments may be found on the web site at the link below :
|Back to Back Issues Page|