Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Lionel Andrades, Monday, April
Article: The pope has not been shown how Vatican Council II has picked up the mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 :this cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit
Preview - Francis’ Synod Exhortation: Brace Yourself for Revolution? The Past is Prologue by John Vennari
“Resist Not the Spirit”?
From the beginning of his pontificate, Francis made clear his resolve to advance the Conciliar agenda.
He is referring to Vatican Council II interpreted not with Feeneyism as a theology, but with irrational and non traditional Cushingism. This is the theology used by John Vennari, Chris Ferrara, the SSPX and FSSP priests.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism (there are no known exceptions to EENS), so LG 16 refers to an invisible and not a visible case. It would not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the 16th century missionaries.For me this would be the interpretation of the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit cannot suggest that Vatican Council II should be interpreted with an irrationality. Yet this is what the pope is doing.The traditionalists are not aware of it, or they are aware of it but do not want to contradict Archbishop Lefebvre who made the same mistake. They still also make the same mistake.
He sees the modernist updating from John XXIII’s Second Vatican Council as a work of the Holy Ghost to be embraced, not resisted.
The pope has not been shown how Vatican Council II has picked up the mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. The Letter assumed there is salvation outside the Church. So LG 8 for example is quoted by Cardinal Christopher Schonborn as saying there is salvation outside the Church.
However it is common sense that no one in the past could have physically seen someone saved without the baptism of water. So if there were no physical cases how could there be exceptions to EENS, how could there be salvation outside the Church? Secondly, in 2016 we do not know of any one saved outside the Church.
Vatican II ushered us into the evolutionary process of continuous aggiornamento..."
Remember he is interpreting Vatican Council II, with all hypothetical cases being objectively known.
This was also the irrational thinking during Vatican Council II.
Many of the passages in Vatican Council II have been inserted based on known salvation outside the Church, which is physically not possible. There can never be known salvation outside the Church.This is human error and not the work of the Holy Spirit.
The Synod is a main engine in furthering this “work of the Spirit”.
For Cardinal Schonborn there is known salvation outside the Church. So he will say at the Press Conference, for the Synod next week, that if Vatican Council II can do away with the dogma EENS, with known salvation outside the Church, then why could not the Synod change other Church teachings?
As I’ve noted in the past, the Synod has been established in order to advance the implementation of Vatican II throughout the world. That is how it was defined by Father Kenneth Boyack, a Paulist who had worked with the NCCB.
Yes Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism.This is a break with Tradition.
Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism would support the dogma EENS, which is the work of the Holy Spirit. Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism, would be a break with the dogma EENs and the centuries old guidance of the Holy Spirit.
Likewise, Tad Szulc, in his biography of Pope John Paul II, explained that the Synod is a “permanent organ to implement the decisions of the Second Vatican Council.”
John Vennari is not aware of Vatican Council II being interpreted with Feeneyism.
No one knows of any one saved outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church. This is an objective mistake made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/no-one-knows-of-any-one-saved-outside.html
Cardinal Schonborn must be told that there are no known cases of someone saved outside the Church http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-schonborn-must-be-told-that.html
Smart-Assed Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devises that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking to see the simple acronym interpretation.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
Culture=Religion+Politics; Who Are We? Vic Biorseth
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
If you want to build a website like this one, this is how you do it.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
and absolutely nothing else.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the