Vic Biorseth, http://www.CatholicAmericanThinker.com
Whenever your mouse passes over or pauses on the sarcastic-editorial abbreviation MEJTML14 , anywhere in the Catholic American Thinker website, the words Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar should appear in a little pop-up text box, so you don't need to actually click on it every time just to see what it means. Just put your mouse on it without clicking, and look at your little text box. (Use your browser's Back button to return.)
You show me a Marxist and I'll show you an ends-justify-the-means liar.
All Marxists are liars. Marxists have to be liars; being a liar is virtually a definitive characteristic of being a Marxist. Lying is a requirement of being a Marxist. The ultimate goal of the Marxist is to move all of society toward or into Communism; that “worthy” goal is the supposedly noble “End” that justifies, in the mind of the Marxist, any “Means” at all that may be applied to achieve it. Historically, these “Means” have included mass deportations, mass movements of whole populations, and even mass murder.
Again, let’s look at the three pithy sayings of the typical Marxist temporarily useful idiot, the future would-be Marxist bureaucrat, and the potential future Marxist dictator, all, on their chosen path toward the ultimate twin goals of the destruction of Capitalism, and the rise to supreme Marxist power:
Twentieth century European and Asian history is loaded down with records of Marxist collectivization and mass-movements of whole enslaved peoples on cattle cars to wherever “The Party” (but really, the Dictator) wanted them all moved. (Note that workers are people, and that makes people part of the means of production that need to be collectivized and redistributed.) Untold millions were simply murdered to achieve the ends of Marxism, because, after all, you cannot make an omelet without breaking some eggs. These three sayings are as close as you can come to identifying a motivational collective ethos that drives atheistic and materialistic Marxism.
Question: How do you know when a Marxist is lying?
Answer: When his mouth is open and words are coming out.
The word of any Marxist is worthless and not to be depended on. Make no contract with any Marxist, for their signature signifies nothing.
The Ends Justify The Means is their only guide for life.
This is an alien, purely worldly ethos that confronts America.
Return to What's New page
Return to HOME PAGE
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" over a link.)
Respond to This Article Below The Last Entry
Date: Fri Sep 02 05:50:29 2011
Isn't it funny you preaching the 'ends-justify-the-means'of Marxism when the US massacred many hundreds of thousands of Japanese in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and they used that same philosophy as justification for their actions ?!
Date: Fri Sep 02 06:52:36 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
We didn’t start that war; it was thrust upon us by the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. Anyone who thinks he might not like the outcome of an all out war should not start one. The way I see it, we had two possible options other than using the newly developed atom bomb.
Which would your preference be?
Date: Fri Sep 02 07:51:57 2011
Vic,my preference would be ANYTHING so long as it doesn't annihilate a whole generation of Japanese. There are ways to go about it. America's military might was far more superior to the Japanese one, and you can always force a country into submission. There is never any justification in wiping out a whole generation of people just so you can end the war quickly. This is the danger of the 'arms race'. The Americans wanted a quick solution and victory to the war. It was politically motivated.
Are Japanese that scary that they had to be nuked?. America could have ended that war in a very different way. It didn't have to end in that fashion.
Date: Sat Sep 03 07:14:39 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Annihilate a whole generation of Japanese? Excuse me? I don’t know whether you were miss-educated into that concept or you just made it up. There were survivors of Hiroshima and survivors of Nagasaki who were close enough to ground zero to have seen the parachute coming down before to bomb went off. There were many survivors who wrote and lectured about it for years and years; some of them are still with us. And – I’m not sure about your knowledge of geography – there were, after all, many, many Japanese cities other than those two.
I’m afraid we will never agree on this. There was, indeed, justification for the act. It’s easy for you to sit back and armchair-quarter-back that war, but it was quite a bit more desperate than you seem to think it was. We could have lost it; we almost did. We were not in a position of being a lone super-power against a tiny defenseless enemy; we got to the superior military position we were in during the closing days of the war only by the relentless shedding of vast amounts of American blood and American capital. It was a desperate war.
There is another factor you are obviously not aware of, in your naive pacifism and let’s all be nice approach to facing an enemy who is out to destroy you: The word surrender was not in the Japanese lexicon. They would not surrender. In horrendous battles, in campaign after campaign, island after island, the number of Japanese prisoners taken alive was miniscule in comparison to any other enemy. This was a level of military fanaticism only comparable to Jihadists.
The decision to use the bomb was not so much The Ends Justify The Means as it was a choice of the lesser among evils. I don’t know how this discourse got into WWII when what this page is about is how Marxists lie. Of course, sometimes the ends justify the means in every day life. You study in order to learn, for example. What this page is about is the Machiavellian Ends Justify The Means, which means you begin the process with deception and treachery, because your real intent must remain hidden until it is accomplished.
Bottom line – Marxists – at least the ones above the level of useful idiocy – lie. That’s what Marxists do.
Date: Sun Sep 04 05:39:58 2011
Vic, I must agree with a lot of what you said, however, would you not agree that at that particular time, Bruce Oppenheimer and others had just developed the atomic bomb, and were very keen to test it for its success. The Japanese incident only gave them the excuse they needed to test their product. The Japanese bombing of 'Pearl Harbour' would have surely shown the desperation of them, but, as Americans are, they could not possibly comprehend a defeat in those circumstances. Are you in agreement with any of my comment?
Date: Sun Sep 04 06:18:04 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Not quite; although it had just been developed at enormous cost and effort, it had been tested in Nevada. At that time it was very, very difficult to build a bomb. The project didn’t even begin until we knew it was possible, and that Germany was working to develop an atom bomb to use on us, and others.
The first two bombs, Little Boy and Fat Man, were all we had at that time. If Japan had not surrendered, we didn’t have another bomb waiting in the wings. It might have taken months to build another one. This was a very rushed project, with products going into production on the fly. There was no method in place to mass-produce bombs or even the products needed in making bombs.
The “Japanese Incident” you speak of – what was it?
I think you’ve got your dates mixed up. Although the Manhattan Project began modestly in 1939, it didn’t really get going and produce anything useful until well after Pearl Harbor and our entry into World War II.
None of this changes the fact that Marxists are ends-justify-the-means liars.
Date: Sun Sep 04 07:54:48 2011
To be perfectly honest with you, I couldn't comment there. Perhaps all "Marxists" are, in your words, "ends-justify-the-means-liars". You obviously know your your stuff, I'll give you that.
Date: Sun Sep 04 19:42:50 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Let me try to put it in a nutshell for you.
Marxism is a dressed-up Machiavellian plan to use deceit and treachery to assume a throne or a dictatorship. Anything that requires deceit and treachery, meaning betrayal of friends and allies, requires lying.
Machiavelli’s vision involved recruiting agent provocateurs and getting them to get into a society in order to disrupt it and cause chaos and disorder, and fully expecting, as reward for their work, to share in the rewards when the new ruler came onto the scene with force, putting down insurrections and disorder. But the ruler would slay even his own agent provocateurs, who caused the disorder in the first place, and the new ruler would be welcomed by the populace and honored for saving what was left of their property, wiping out the rioters and restoring order.
Recruit them; send them out to cause disorder; kill them all to restore order; ascend the throne. Very simple; nothing to it.
If you carefully read Marx’s masterpiece, the Communist Manifesto, you will see that it is, precisely, a very dressed-up version of Machiavelli’s plan. It has a corrupted and distorted version of history that leads the future “Useful Idiot” to fall under the spell of class envy, it points him toward a “perfect” Utopian Dream system (which is quite impossible) and re-establishes his sense of right versus wrong. It then calls him to begin, participate in or support violent revolution against authority – all authority; and against – believe it or not – even the very idea of private property. And they actually believe this crap.
The typical useful idiot is aware neither of the impossibility of the Communist utopian dream, nor of how he personally has been set up for slaughter, by the very one(s) who recruited him to the cause.
It is not possible to be a real Marxist and not be a liar. You cannot betray someone unless you lie to him to have him believe you would not betray him. The whole purpose of the plan involves betrayal on a massive scale.
Even the few, the head Marxists who know what the game is about, cannot trust each other, for each is a potential betrayer of the others, and they all know it. Only one can be on top. True Marxists cannot even trust each other, for they know that they are liars, cheats, traitors, and that treachery is their game. It’s what they do.
Does that help? Read the Manifesto, slowly and carefully.
You might also read Machiavelli’s The Prince.
Date: Mon Sep 26 06:38:41 2011
I have to agree with you, in every respect. Humans are "unequal" and "different" to each other. We are competitive by nature, and everyone aspires to be something different, therefore, just by logic, it is quite evident to any person who is rational in their thinking, that this kind of system: Marxism, Socialism or Communism, was "doomed for failure"......thanks for the advice on "The Prince", I shall read it!
Date: Mon Sep 26 20:50:02 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
I bid you good reading, and good thinking.
From: Vic Biorseth
Date: Friday, August 31, 2012
Converted webpage to SBI! 3.0 and/or updated to use Reusable Code feature of new release. (LOVE this new release.)
Date: Tue Oct 07 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.
Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .
Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our
standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is.
If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Anti-American Leftists will never tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker Free E-zine Subscription
Smart-Assed Hover Link PagesSLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex GESGOEAEOT2 Gradually, Ever So Gradually, Over Eons And Eons Of Time PEWAG3 Punctuated Equilibrium's Wild Assed Guess TTRSTF4 Them There Real Scientifical Type Fellers TTRSPTF5 Them There Real Smart Perfesser Type Fellers TTRSJTF6 Them There Real Smart Journalistical Type Fellers SNRTACBT7 Surely No Right Thinking Adult Could Believe Today STNSEACPB8 Surely Today No Serious, Educated Adult Could Possibly Believe WDN9 We Don't Know BMDFP10 Baboons, Mongrel Dogs, Filthy Pigs HBAACOTE11 Human Beings Are A Cancer On The Earth ACLU12 Anti-Christian Litigation Union FLORMPORIF13 Flagrant Liar, Or, Mindless Parrot, Or, Innocent Fool MEJTML14 Marxist Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar Islamic Ends-Justify-The-Means Liar MPAV16 Marxist Principles And Values WBESSWG17 Wise, Benign, Elite, Super-Scientific World Governance TRMITM18 The Reason Man's In This Mess
Click the image above to
publish your essay or article here,
to be included among those below.
Submitted Articles and
(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)
Here comes the Synod Exhortation, and more EENS denial. Is this original simple mistake leading us into doctrinal and ecclesial revolution?
Agreeing with Mother Angelica, Rest In Peace, on no known exceptions to EENS. Are all VCII and Post-VCII "exceptions" to No Salvation Outside The Church just imaginary?
Was Archbishop Lefebvre Correct After All? Archbishop Lefebvre was correct in rejecting Vatican Council II, interpreted with irrationality. May God bless him for that.
Cardinal Kasper's False Arguments. Pope Benedict, Cardinal Kasper's false arguments for Synod Report: Vatican Council II agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.
Rahner's "Anonymous Christian" as main line Catholic theology. Coming back full circle?
The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.
Faith, from the Easter series on the Three Theological Virtues. The virtue of Faith; One of the Seven Heavenly Virtues.
Hope, from the Easter series on the Three Theological Virtues. The virtue of Hope; One of the Seven Heavenly Virtues.
Love, from the Easter series on the Three Theological Virtues. The virtue of Love; One of the Seven Heavenly Virtues.
Prudence, from the Lenten series on the Four Cardinal Virtues. The virtue of Prudence; One of the Seven Heavenly Virtues.
Justice, from the Lenten series on the Four Cardinal Virtues. The virtue of Justice; One of the Seven Heavenly Virtues.
Temperance and Fortitude, from the Lenten series on the Four Cardinal Virtues. The virtues of Temperance and Fortitude; Two of the Seven Heavenly Virtues.
On the word Consubstantial, the Trinity and Infinity. On the Consubstantial (Single Substance) of God, and the mathematically impossible number of Infinity.
A Proposed Israeli National Doctrine that America should Learn From. Reprinted Article identifies common ideological enemies of Israel, the USA, and all Nations: Marxism, and New World Order concepts.
The challenge describes Capitalism as illusory and Marxism as solid. The mixture of religion just adds to the confusion of all good realists.
The Obama Ethos: Who is Barack Obama? What is his grounding, his ethos? The Obama Ethos explores Obama's grounds of being; his religious, moral and political guiding principles.
Obama the Moslem: Introducing Comrade Obama (peace be upon him.) Obama the Moslem: anti-Catholic; anti-Christian; anti-Jew; anti-American.
Freedom, yes – but from whom, and to do what? Is freedom from God enslavement to the world? Is freedom from the world enslavement to God? Which is better?
The Room: Born of that still inner voice. A story about a small church pastor who erects a small room to serve as a mediation room for his parishioners.
Are Catholics Saved, by having been Born Again? The theology of salvation: Catholic vs. Protestant.
Love thy neighbor as thyself: the Law in One Sentence. Can one simple sentence contain the whole of the moral Law of God?
The Catholic call is universal; it goes out to everyone. Although the Catholic call goes out to all, man’s free will means that all will not respond.
God’s Perfect Unconditional Love meets man’s Free Will. Perfect Unconditional Love can be rejected. Liberty and free choice may be a blessing or a curse.
Of Weeds and Wheat growing together, and the eventual separation. - Weeds and wheat in the field differs from in human kind, where either one can become the other.
Why Should I Believe in God? - an article by Eugene Rudder.
On Losing You - a poem by Rosemarie A. Stone.
Our Beautiful Love - a poem by Rosemarie A. Stone.
Catholic Communism: Similarities between Church Hierarchy and Pure Bureaucracy. Mises said that Communism equals Bureaucracy; the Church is a bureaucracy, therefore we have Catholic Communism. True?
The Source of Anxiety: Improper Priorities. Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness.
“I, Pencil … ”; Capitalism in a Nutshell. Leonard E. Read
Endless Concessions to the Palestinians Pamela Levene
The Peace Treaty Sajid Ali Khan
Leftist Politics in Catholic Mass Mark Brumbaugh
The USCCB Flip-Flop Mark Brumbaugh
Open Letter to Daniel Cardinal DiNardo Mark Brumbaugh
The Gift Bearers Michael from Florida
Dear Vic And Others ... John Felland
The Church Is Rotten To The Core Michelle Lobdell
Hatred of Palin Janet Morana
Proper Catechesis Susan Greve
Who is Barack Obama? Pastor Robert Legg Greve
Limited War Doctrine Colonel Thomas Snodgrass
Rabbi Meir Kahane's Letter Rabbi Meir Kahane, OBM
Solzhenitsyn Speaks Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn addresses the AFL/CIO.
The American Constitution (American Founding Fathers)
American Democrat Party Platform Karl Marx and Frederick Engles
Prof. Libor Brom
Re The Sin Of Scandal Phil Lange
Marxist Infiltration into Catholic Thought Nancy Libert
New "race and racism" thread begun by Stephen from VT. On race and racism: the ever changing definition and generic usage of the word "racism."
The Bush War Doctrine Revisited: a fresh look at our horrible situation. A reproduction of the "Bush War Doctrine Revisited" article and discussion points by David Yerushalmi; there is much food for thought here.
Resignation of Benedict XVI and the Immediate Media Firestorm. The resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and Rev. Marcel Guarnizo's interview with the author that caused the international media frenzy.
The Jewish Shabbat. Description of Jewish Shabbat (Sabbath) from my Holy Land item supplier.
Kerry's Lies: The Old, Vietnam-Era Anti-War Chickens are Comming Home to Roost. POW Lawsuit Could Force Kerry To Come Clean - by George "Bud" Day, Chairman, Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation.
Just Laws for a Godly Nation. Many nations today still lack a core of just laws for a Godly nation.
What does the World Wildlife Fund have to do with World Youth Day? An unholy alliance between the Leftist WWF and the Vatican?
False Flag: Serious-minded fiction creating a better understanding of 9/11. Can serious-minded fiction play a role in creating a better understanding of critical contemporary social/political issues like 9/11?
Bringing the Liturgy Back to the Real Vatican II. Cardinal Burke Comments on Sacra Liturgia Conference
Layman letter to all bishops. Letter to Bishops from Mariann / Mary's Child
Fetal-Microchimerism gives new meaning to the bonding of Motherhood. How the unborn child blesses the mother and physically changes her, for the rest of her life.
Ars celebrandi et adorandi - Pastoral Letter from Bishop Thomas John Paprocki. With Ars celebrandi et adorandi, all Springfield IL Catholic Parishes move Jesus back to the center of life! YES!
To be, or not no be lukewarm; that is the question. Whether tis nobler to fight the good fight, or just smile and be nice ...
Technology: a Two Edged Sword. Technology can be used for good, or for evil.
More American Imperial Edicts Issuing Forth out of Obamunism. Archbishop Schnurr joins Rick Santorum in identifying American Imperial Edicts from this administration.
Benedict XVI's Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum; Apostolic letter on 1962 Rite.
The Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum confirms the 1962 Latin Rite as the 'Extraordinary' Roman Liturgical Rite.
The Pope's Letter to Bishops on Summorum Pontificum. Benedict XVI's Letter to Bishops on Summorum Pontificum issued the same day as the Motu Proprio.
The Explanatory Note on Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum. An 'Explanatory Note on Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum' issued by the Vatican.
A concerned Catholic spotlights Catholic funded Alinsky organizations. The Alinskyite Gamaliel Foundation underpins multiple Catholic funded Alinsky organizations.
From Shane Leslie Mattison, whose father was Elden Mattison Woolliams. Annecdotes from Shane Leslie Mattison.
Dr. Ben Carson, Champion of God, Family, Country and Decency in Government. Ben Carson can return America to being a Constitutional Republic once again.
A submission from someone who would be Pope. If all the last five or so Popes have been invalid Popes, then, where's the valid one? Why, Brother Michael, of course!
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the