Formerly the Thinking Catholic Strategic Center
Site best viewed on a computer screen - not optimized for cell phones
50 most recent articles updated on this Web-Site: BLOG (Web-Log) Page
Vic Biorseth, Friday, October 15, 2021
If you don't know what we're talking about here, start out by reading Linda Kimball's most recent treatment of The Great Reset. If you don't know or don't believe that the American people and the American government have been slowly, incrementally and successfully "politically compromised" out from under being governed by their own Constitution, read the recent Immutability treatment of once Constitutional America.
It doesn't matter if the Constitution is legally immutable if it is ignored, bypassed, no longer taught in schools and no one is even reading it any more. If it isn't applied, and if it isn't even well known, it may as well not even exist. American government has been and is now reduced to two (unconstitutionally existing) political parties running everything, and competing to achieve one-party-rule over America. We are ruled, not by our Constitution, but solely by the current winning political party's political agenda goals, unconstitutional and anti-American though they may be.
If you have read the Constitution, then you know that American citizens are supposed to be a self-governing citizenry. That's what Liberty really means.
If the ongoing and so far successful reset is to be unset, the American people are going to have to do it. The government - i.e., the Political Parties - are certainly not going to do it.
We see the same thing in the Church. The current reigning Church government is certainly not going to unset the very global reset that it is a vitally important part of.
What could stir the American citizenry to unset the reset?
In America, an unset of the reset would mean the restoration of the Constitution to absolute rule over the USA that it constituted.
A Trump Presidency could unset the reset, one Constitutional right at a time, and each time, do it as the crowd goes wild.
"No Constitutional right is absolute" say the Communists. (I mean Marxocrats.) But they are liars. Constitutional rights are indeed absolute rights, not to be infringed.
Freedom of speech is already lost. Not just tempered, or reduced, but lost. Only anti-Americans, anti-Christians, anti-white racists, anti-male chauvinists, anti-straight homos and anti-Trad "Catholics" enjoy freedom of speech.
For instance, if you feel compelled to avoid the word nigger at all costs, whether spoken or written, and replace it with the word combination "The N Word" then you have already surrendered your Constitutional right to freedom of speech.
Oh, but it's racist, you say. Not necessarily, but even if it is, the most offensive speech is precisely the kind of speech that was intended to be protected. Blacks and other minorities are perfectly free to use anti-white racist slurs like honky, cracker, gringo, and - guess what - nigger, but whites are not. People will linguistically stumble all over themselves avoiding offending minorities, even as minorities, and Communist whites, viciously and falsely insult whites, who have done nothing whatsoever to deserve it.
Nigger is a word. It is only a word.
Don't give me the crap about how "you can't yell "fire!" in a crowded theater", because, yes, you can. And when you do, assuming there is no fire, the sin you commit involves lying, not properly using an absolute right. You don't take a whole Constitutional right away from the citizenry just because somebody abused it.American citizens are (Constitutionally) perfectly free to openly argue in favor of Marxism, and they do argue for Marxism, but not really openly; they paint it as preferable to American Constitutionalism, which is a lie. They are, of course, MEJTML14 s. You show me a Marxist and I'll show you an ends justify the means liar. The whole Marxocrat Party is Marxist, and the whole Republicrat Party is little better, since it always finds a path to "Bipartisan cooperation" with Marxism in order to "get things done".
Every single thing of any political substance that Karl Max ever said or wrote operates in direct opposition to and aims at the destruction of Christianity, religion, the normative family, sovereign nations, and most especially and particularly, Constitutional America.
"Hate Speech" laws are unconstitutional on their face.
Yet American citizens have been fired, lost business and even whole businesses, been ostracized and "canceled", sued and and legally punished over ever having issued a "homophobic slur" or a "racial epithet" or a "misogynistic insult".
Yet, Marxocrats and other Communists in America are perfectly free to teach, preach and promote such insanities as "Toxic Masculinity", "Systemic Racism", "Critical Race Theory", "Transgenderism", "Darwinism", "Freudianism", and, of course, "Marxism".
Our speech is limited; theirs is not.
The only "systemic" racism ever in America was in the Democrat Party, not in the white race, and not in America as founded and as Constituted, and not in Europe, and not in "colonialism".
If the Marxists are free to speak against the Constitution, then Constitutionalists are equally free to speak against Marxism and describe it as it actually is, whether they like it or not. Freedom of speech runs on a two way street. In open, unresticted debate, they lose.
Therefore, they cannot and they will not allow open unrestricted debate. They absolutely must control and restrict citizen speech.
Declaring hate speech laws to be unconstitutional, null and no law, in and of itself, would go a long way toward an unset of the reset.
As would undoing all gun control.
The Second Amendment established an absolute citizen right to possess and to carry deadly weapons. Unrestricted. Not to be infringed.
Every single gun control law in America, at federal, state and local levels, is a direct violation of the Constitution. Gun registration is a violation of the Constitution. If the federal government has a legitimate Constitutional ability to do anything at all regarding guns in the hands of the citizenry, it is to help the states in "organizing, arming and disciplining the militia", which is every able bodied man between the ages of 16 and 65. [Article One Section Eight]
The 1931 banning of fully automatic weapons did nothing other than to enable the Mafia and other "career criminals" free reign to commit crimes using sub-machine guns against the partially disarmed honest citizenry.
Every other gun control law ever passed increased the armed advantage of the criminal element against the disarmed honest populace. The reason is simple: Criminals disobey laws; the law abiding obey laws. Very simple; nothing to it. (Marxists know that, they love that, and that's why they do it: to feed lawlessness, disorder and chaos.)
But the supreme law of the land says that we the people may be armed.
Destroying all gun registration records and nullifying all gun control laws would go a long way toward a total unset of the reset.
And it just might put the fear of God in some of the gangbangers out there murdering unarmed citizens on a nightly basis.
So that's what lit my fire this morning, and that's my morning rant.
The only thing Truth has going for Him in this world is us.
The restoration of Truth = Reality in the hearts and minds of men is now totally dependent upon you and me; if we don't do it, it won't get done.
Sign the Letter to your Bishop, and make our Church Catholic again.
Join Cardinal Burke's Storm Heaven Rosary Campaign.
Get behind President Trump, and make America Constitutional again.
Pray for a strategic collaboration between Vigano and Trump.
With fear and trembling, work out your salvation--Phil 2:12
Seek the Truth; Find the Way; Live the Life.
Please God, and Live Forever.
Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation; hover over it just to see the simple interpretation.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
[All Web Pages listed in Site Map by date-of-publication;
oldest at the top, newest at the bottom of the list.]
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
All Published Articles
By Publication Date
Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and
broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in
thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life:
and few there are that find it! Beware of false prophets, who come to you in
the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Jesus Christ; Matt 7:13-15
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston Churchill
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the