Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, Thursday,
April 23, 2015
Marxocrat Party political candidates for office often remain aloof and untouched by the sound and fury of the contest. The reason is that their almost totally owned "Journalists" do most of their real work of political argumentation for them. They put forth the main Marxist arguments, which are to say, the anti-Constitution and anti-American Ethos arguments, by ad hominem attacks on Republicrat Party opponents. And our Republicrats almost always accept the false premises of the arguments and begin nuancing and detailing their positions, arguing in circles, getting way off message, and wasting time and energy on foolishness. All while being demonized in the public eye.
No one is straight forward and honest in these arguments, on either side.
But if you look at the root of all of the Marxocrat positions, the bases of all their arguments, you find the same root, always. What they argue against is the family (pro-contraception; pro-abortion; no fault divorce; pro-homosexuality), the Judeo-Christian American Ethos (public expression or exercise of religion), Constitutional Legislation (new law created by Executive action, Bureaucratic Regulation, case law adjudicated Legal Precedent), Constitutional Limitation (federal law or regulation addressing climate, sexuality, fuels, diet, etc.), violation of Constitutional Rights (religion, speech, press, assembly, association, privacy, property, gun ownership, gun ownership transfer, what we choose to buy) - the single root of all of these positions will be found in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto.
Look especially, but not exclusively, at the Pillars of Communism within the Manifesto. And examine the Communist Goals of Subversion, which all true Communists, who are not running for office in America, are quite open about. Then, you will have examined the current foundation and purpose of our Marxocrat Party. It may have started out as the pro-slavery, anti-American, let's-start-a-new-slavery-nation Party of Jefferson Davis, but now it has morphed from that, through the Party of Segregation Forever!, and right on into the anti-American Party of Karl Marx. Hate, and the feeding of hatred, is a Marxocrat identifier.
The Marxocrat Party Platform is today indistinguishable from Marxism. It may have been modified and brought up to date by newer stratagems born of the newer "Progressive" variant of Marxism, from the likes of Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Saul Alinsky, Cloward and Piven, etc., but it is still, and quite clearly, anti-Christian, anti-American, anti-Constitution, flat out pre-revolutionary Marxism. But nobody ever points that out.
We've already talked about our current absolutely stupid foreign policy positions, ranging from Ron Paul style Total Isolationism all the way to the newer Obamunist Come Destroy Us, We'll Help You policy. From suicidal stupidity to treason, with few, if any, discernible reasonable positions in between.
What still needs to be addressed is how the Marxist position arguments, for the last hundred years, always gain political ground in our once upon a time anti-Marxist government. The pro-Constitution candidates are always kept busy with nonsense - extraneous issues, ad hominem attacks, defending themselves and arguing in circles. The pro-Constitution arguments, most often, are not even made.
Many will argue that FDR's contribution to turning the American government Marxist was the greatest, due to his successful creation of economic time bombs like Social Security and Fannie Mae, his creation of numerous vast, extra-Constitutional Administrative Bureaucracies ("Soviets") with regulating authority and his government assumption of legal control over private wages and income, and private business revenues and profits.
But it was Wilson who first got the Marxist ball rolling in American government, with three really big pro-Marxist, anti-Constitution advances. And they were:
I submit that the worst of these, from a Constitutional perspective, is the last. It is the most damaging, long term, because it turned our Upper House, which was supposed to be above politics, into just another popularly elected body, distracted by periodic political contests, and preoccupied with constituent wishes, rather than the wishes of their duly elected State Governments.
The Senators, prior to Amendment XVII, were appointed by their state governments, to represent their states; not the voters of their states, but the states themselves. They were supposed to be above politics; statesmen rather than politicians. "Ambassadors" from the states to the federal government, if you will, with equal power to the House in the legislation of law, and with the added power of advice and consent to foreign treaties, appointments to the Supreme Court, appointments of Ambassadors, and other appointments to high office. Always considering the needs of their individual states, and subject only to appointment and recall from their dully elected state governments.
Now, American Senators are mere politicians, preoccupied with political contests, political Parties and political fund raising. Amendment XVII moved America closer to simple Democracy and away from the original Constitutional design of the Framers. Why is that bad?
Way back to slightly after the Civil War, Alexis de Tocqueville warned us of how we would most likely meet our national demise. His warning was that our Republic would exist only until Congress discovered that it could bribe the voters with the public's own money. It would then begin to move toward making the Republic into a simple Democracy. And that a Democracy cannot permanently exist; it must collapse upon itself eventually.
Politicians who seek to move America more toward being a Democracy - by abolishing the Electoral College, for instance - are actually moving us inevitably toward the eventual collapse of America and Marxist revolution aimed at by the Marxocrat Party and their obedient partners-in-crime who form our News Media, education system and entertainment industry. Most of whom, in all probability, are Marxists of the ignorant Useful Idiot variety rather than the Machiavellian traitor variety. They simply are not smart enough to see where this is going.
But all of the stupid political arguments being made today revolve around the stupidly feared "Social Conservative" positions on issues involving Judeo-Christian and natural morality. The Secularism movement has made such progress that today Christians are held to be superstitious, backward flat-earthers and climate-deniers, and their arguments are held to be untenable in today's enlightened environment. Again, as we saw them do in the Stupid Foreign Policy treatment, the Libertarians here join in with the moral degenerates in helping to destroy our national moral standard, whether knowingly or otherwise.
The Libertarian position holds that there is not or there should not be a common moral standard for everyone in any society, including the Judeo-Christian moral standard of Western Civilization. What someone else thinks is right or wrong should not be imposed upon someone else with another standard. So, such things as drug use, or homosexual marriage, etc., are, to them, acceptable to be established in law. Libertarians are simply not smart enough to know that the steady moral degradation of their own culture will certainly have an adverse affect on them and on their progeny.
If it doesn't affect them personally or immediately hurt them in any way, they will allow it, and even welcome it and bless it. They thereby reveal that they, or many of them, are not the Christians that they publicly advertise themselves to be. Libertarians live according to Practical Atheism, in which they live and act exactly as if they were atheists, regardless of whatever faith they may publicly profess. They will publicly condone if not bless that which their own Scripture condemns.
Like Jesus, they "go to the sinners"; unlike Jesus, they do not call sinners to repentance and conversion, but remain in their close company, and, by their seeming acquiescence, cooperate in the advance of sin and evil in the larger culture. All that is required for the advance of evil is for good men to not oppose it; which is to say, for good men to no longer be good men.
Sodom and Gomorrah did not become the abominations that they were all at once. It happened little by little, by advancing and not being opposed. Modern American culture is now following suite. If a man tolerates open, blatant, scandalous Sodom-ites and Gomorrah-ites in his company, in his house, at his table, in the presence of his children, then he should not be publicly pretending to be a practicing Jew or a practicing Christian, of any variety whatsoever. The Scriptures have not changed, and God has not moved. Good and evil still exist. We stand in one or the other. Very simple; nothing to it.
Homosexual Marriage, like the Unlimited Abortion that preceded it, like the Artificial Contraception that preceded that, is a direct Satanic attack on nature itself, as well as on the normative family - it is an attack on the primal social unit, upon which healthy, civilized society is built. It is an attack on Human Population, among civilized societies. And human population is only a problem for Dictatorships, where every human being is another non-producing, completely dependent mouth to feed, a drag on the economy and thus a problem for government. But, in our American used-to-be Constitutional Republic, every human being was a blessing to his government, as liberated, wealth-producing, government-revenue producing, Human Capital. An Investment. Very Valuable to government.
Note well that all of the so-called "Social Issues" currently demonized in pop-culture, which "Conservative" candidates and voters are constantly warned to avoid at all costs, all violate both Nature and Natural Processes, and, not coincidentally, the Word of God. No exceptions.
This ungodliness, this social acceptance if not embracing and celebrating clear immorality and clear opposition to nature is destructive of civilized society. Civilization itself is at stake here. American citizens who declare themselves to be "economic conservatives, but not social conservatives" are destructive of decent civilized society by their own living example to their own children and to all other observers. They say that such things are OK with them. Libertarians and others who declare either support for or neutrality toward opposition to nature and to God's Word, knowingly or otherwise, contribute mightily to the steady destruction of decent human civilization.
Here's the interesting thing in all of this: the Framers who wrote, argued and ratified the Constitution, all of whom were both economic and social conservatives, never even mentioned any of the "social issues" in the Constitution. High morality was just assumed; it never occurred to them that anyone would ever purposely use artificial contraception, or willingly abort a child, or socially welcome public displays of open homosexuality in polite society or among the citizenry.
None of these sins are listed in Article One Section Eight of the Constitution. Thus, they are out of scope for federal law. Congress is not free to legislate federal law concerning them one way or another. And Congress never did.
The most stupid of all the stupid political arguments - almost - is the Leftist argument that says that we Constitutionalists are seeking to impose our "morality" on the whole nation through federal law. Note that I said almost. There is one argument that is even more stupid than that; it is the argument that isn't even made by Constitutionalist candidates. The argument that should be made, but isn't, is that the Leftist argument is 180 degrees out of phase; the exact opposite is true. Those who support the perversion of nature and the violation of all civilized morality are the ones seeking to legally impose their blatant immorality upon the whole of the nation. Unconstitutionally.
Not through the Constitutional legislative route, but through establishing legal case law precedent, in cases that, according to the Constitution, no federal court should even be considering for adjudication in the first place. They get the courts to violate the Constitutional limitations on federal government, and set legal precedents that, in effect, create new law, in direct violation of the Constitutionally established sole authority of the Congress to make new law.
Then, with the aiding and abetting of their Media, they turn the argument around and accuse those who oppose their anti-Constitution efforts. They falsely accuse us of trying to impose our respect for nature and our love of Christian morality on the whole of this supposedly, or used-to-be, Christian nation. An obvious lie.
All of the feared so-called social issues are matters of community standards, to be regulated, if at all, at state or local jurisdictions. None of them are federal issues to begin with. The effort is being made to establish them in the collective psyche as "rights" comparable to the civil rights of the Declaration, or of the Bill of Rights. But they all defy nature; if they are not natural, like those in the Declaration and those in the Bill of Rights, then they most certainly are not universal civil rights of all men.
False education, indoctrination and propaganda will not change the reality of the social issues. The struggle to advance evil goes on at all levels, but the real goal is federal law, even while the champions of evil falsely accuse the Constitutionalists of doing what they themselves are doing. Legally imposing their will upon us. In direct violation of the Constitution.
Repealing Roe v Wade, or declaring it Unconstitutional and Null, for instance, would not somehow make abortion illegal. It would stop the federal government from overriding state and local law that does not involve or violate the Constitution. It would be the same with the repeal or nullification of gun laws, or the repeal or nullification of religious interference laws, or anything else.
But, the Marxocrat Media Journalists who interview Constitutionalist candidates, and who "moderate" political debates in favor of their Marxocrat masters, will ask questions like, "Do you oppose contraception?", or, "Do you deny Climate Change?", or, "Would you attend a gay wedding?", or, "Do you believe people are born gay?", etc., etc., etc. And the candidate will begin to answer by accepting the premise, and begin arguing in circles, defending himself, getting way, way off message, and staying there.
When he should be attacking, directly, openly and loudly. Challenging the original premise, and pointing out the open fraudulent claims. Pointing out the obvious political position of the journalist or the Marxocrat, which is championing falsehood, championing opposition to nature and championing pure unadulterated evil. And that is not a false premise.
Here's the thing about such journalists and other Marxocrats: They lie.
None of these issues are scientific. Not one bit of any of it. None of it is or can be backed up with any empirical evidence or scientific proof of any kind. The original lie of it should become the real and only emphasized topic of ongoing argument.
Is there any real Constitutionalist candidate out there who will speak clearly and openly about this?
A whole nation of voters, betrayed by both Political Parties, disgusted by "bi-partisan" treachery, is eager to respond.
His will be done.
Smart-Assed Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devises that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
Culture=Religion+Politics; Who Are We? Vic Biorseth
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Fri Apr 24 21:13:54 2015
You forgot to mention that we've been betrayed firstly by the Church leaders who have stayed silent on moral issues in the public square. They run a business more than they run a church.
Date: Sat Apr 25 2015
From: Vic Biorseth
Good point. While we have addressed that in other pages, it certainly deserves attention here. Smoothed over, dressed-up mortal sin disguised as "good" and "natural" advances in the public psyche wherever it is not identified and addressed. The first and best place for that clear language confrontation to occur would be not only from the pulpit, but from ranking Church leaders standing up right out there in the public square. Right now, evil propaganda is winning at the grass roots level. Just about all "unengaged" Moron Voters now believe that evil is good, and good is evil. That is what the Marxocrats, the "Bi-Partisan" Republicrats and their News Media are depending upon. That's their voter base. They intend to make them and keep them dumber and dumber, through evil indoctrination and propaganda.
Date: Sat Apr 25 2015
From: Vic Biorseth
It seems appropriate to mention the overall nature of the comments and submissions that come in, whether on this webpage or any of the many other webpages on this website, which do not get published. They all represent the opposition to all that we say in this site, but that is not why they do not get published on this site. Most usually, a submission is rejected because of filthy language, pure insults, threats, whether standing alone or in combination with blithering idiocy. But it occurs to me that they all seem to hold one thing in common: Hatred.
Absolute, blind hatred. In the Black and White or Shades of Grey treatment, we talked about Love. Those who love God love others most fully and completely, because love is perfected and made more pure through the discovery and application of love of God. It begins with recognition of God's love of us, and is completed with our own love of God.
These hate-filled contributors, whose comments are undeserving of publication here, are most likely incapable of love of anyone, because of their broken relationship with God. All they can do is hate. They probably hate even themselves.
Please pray for the contributors who never get published here.
If you want to build a website like this one, this is how you do it.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
and absolutely nothing else.
Purpose of this grouping of links is to provide a record of how Political Parties outlive their original purpose for being, change agendas and come to exist merely to take and use political power, with no fixed and unchangeable principles, such as patriotism, citizen representation, constitutionalism, etc.
The Political Parties Pages
George Washington warned of the danger of the rise of Political Parties, and their inevitably destructive influence on good government. He was right. We are now ruled, not by our Constitution, which is no longer recognized as the supreme law of the land. We are now ruled by the Parties, and by the owners of the Parties, who comprise America's New Ruling Class. They who now own and operate all three branches of American Government.
Damn the Delegates, and Damn the Party, but Not the Two Best Candidates. It is the Delegate System, and the Party System, that Trick Us and Diabolically Divide Us.
Unconstitutional Party Delegates Unconstitutionally Picking Party Nominees. Unconstitutional Party Delegates of Unconstitutional Parties Unconstitutionally deciding who gets to run for President.
Unifying Hatred pulls the Political Parties together in Bipartisan Cooperation. As time goes on our two main Parties have less that divides them, as they agree more and more on varying kinds of Unifying Hatred.
The Rampant Unconstitutionism in Marxocrat Party Positions. Chris Matthews' question of Trump re punishing women for getting abortions puts Leftist Unconstitutionism on open public display.
The Political Party System that Runs America Despite the American Constitution. Cruz's Pro-Constitution agenda, and Rush's Anti-Liberal/Democrat Party agenda, aren't going anywhere while the Political Party System Itself Still Exists.
On Democratization out of Common Sense and Liberty, and into Marxism. Democratization out of the American Republic and into Marxism relies on the prerequisite educational assassination of simple common sense.
There is nothing wrong and everything right with American Nationalism. American Nationalism: fierce pride in America as Declared and Constituted; the exact opposite of Nationalism combined with Marxism-Socialism-Communism, Democracy, Monarchy, Theocracy or Dictatorship.
Governing by Phony Crisis, and Doubling Down to Grow Government. In the Governing by Phony Crisis scam, no crisis ever gets solved; they only grow, and multiply, and Grow Government.
Party Politics: Treachery and Betrayal of the Citizenry and the Constitution. The Ruling Elites are so steeped in their sly Treachery and Betrayal, so into themselves, so Certain, so broken from actual reality that they still do not understand Trump's continuing rise to power.
We're all looking for the Candidate who might fix our Anti-American Court. The next President might get to appoint four new Justices; that's all well and good, but why don't we even think about Impeachment for the majority of them right now?
Trump and Palin: Why are they considered to be the incompatible "Odd Couple"? If there's an incompatible "Odd Couple" it is the Tea Party and the Republicrat Party, not Trump and Palin, both of whom fully intend to stop exactly what we the people want stopped.
Replacing Scalia calls us to Restore American Constitutionalism.
Replacing Scalia is not enough; his Spirit calls us to Restore the
Constitution to its rightful place as the Supreme Law of the Land.
The Crony Capitalists who enrich the Capitalist Communists in our government. Crony Capitalists buy the Politicians who favor them with subsidies and favored tax breaks, and keep raising taxes to get richer and richer and richer.
All the secretly Capitalist Communists in America's Marxocrat Party. The Corrupt Crony Capitalist Communists getting filthy rich while pushing Marxist-Socialism on rest of the nation.
Fag Power: Owning and running more of the Church, and more of America. On some of Marxism's earliest created and exploited splinter groups now becoming the dominant exploiters and owners and drivers of culture.
Presenting America's new rulers: The Political Parties. The Constitution is now dead. What we have in its place is government of the people by the Parties for the Parties.
Legally Destroying America, through Defining Treason Down. American Political Parties are swiftly dismantling Constitutional government, having first defined treason down to the point of non-existence.
Political Parties: Redirecting allegiance away from the nation. Political Parties demand first obedience to the Party, not to the Constitution, slowly poisoning the nation.
Two Party Treason: Marxist Democrats Vs. Big Government Republicans. If both political Parties violate the Constitution in different ways, what we have is two Party treason.
Recognizing the Bipartisan or Nonpartisan Treason Destroying Civilization. The seductive desire for brotherly peaceful cooperation corrupts the world through nonpartisan treason.
Imagining a No Party America, with political Parties outlawed. When Political Parties oppose or do not defend the Constitution it is time for a No Party America.
New Way American Politics: Restoring and Advancing Cultural Americanism. A New Way of doing our Politics after anathematizing Political Parties, Marxism, Islam and Globalism.
Current Democratic Party platform reveals anti-Semitic streak among Liberals. In their voting, their speechifying, and in the slant of their controlled mainstream media reporting, the current Democratic Party Platform is made clear to all observers.
The Confederate Flag is also the Democrat Party Flag. Surprise. It's the Democrat Party Flag. "Democrat" is Synonymous with "Confederate", and should be used interchangeably.
Crony-Catholicism? Really? The USCCB is advancing Obamunism? Say it ain't so, Joe! It's bad enough that we now have so many Marxified Bishops, but now they actually act against the faith?
Has the USCCB morphed into the Catholicrat Party with it's own political agenda? Our Democrat Party is now Maxocrat; our Republican Party is now Republicrat; has our USCCB gone Catholicrat?
The Republicrat Liars: Cooperating in the Destruction of America. All Marxocrats always lie; therefore, Republicrat Liars are the most treacherous liars.
Stupid Political Arguments: False Premises and Talking In Circles. Presenting the stupid political arguments of our Marxist Democrats, always initiated and publicly argued for them by their News Media.
Feeding of Democratized Reality, inevitably ending in Loss of all Credibility. Scientific Consensus = Democratized Reality = Propagandized "Truth" = Falsehood espoused by believing fools.
Obamunist Assassins: Could pre-planned assassinations bring him back to power? Does a President of a Capitalist Christian nation, who was raised by Communists and educated by Moslems, really intend to permanently leave office?
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the