Formerly the Thinking Catholic Strategic Center
July 05, 2017
My challenge to committed Darwinists has always been of the put up or shut up variety, demanding scientific proof, or any truly scientific basis for their silly belief. The Darwinism Pages are full of these challenges. Speciation - the natural "evolutionary" generation of any new species that may reproduce itself, but may no longer reproduce with the parent species - has never been observed by man. Nor has any speciation event ever been found in the fossil record. Nor has any forced-speciation event ever been accomplished in the laboratory, using short-lived species.
Three current cultural-social facts are of vital importance here:
Now, at God Will Be Heard, we find a post, at Evolution is NOT compatible with Catholic Faith that puts all the Bishops, Priests and Deacons of the Catholic Church who are always over anxious to "accommodate" Darwinism and even blend it in with Catholicism. For the sake of not arguing with Scientism, or something. Or maybe for the sake of not alienating popular culture. Or maybe not upsetting any professor friends and colleagues.
Or maybe for the sake of not upsetting The Outside World.
God Will Be Heard takes the challenge to the faith of Darwinism straight to the clerics, of whatever rank, who hold to that faith, and still claim to be Catholic. How, exactly, is it possible to believe that Scripure is inspired and true, and simultaneously hold to the belief that Darwin's evolution of species from other species is also true? The two things are mutually exclusive, are they not?
Why do they hold to the notion that Genesis is not to be taken literally?
Could it be to accommodate an unproven and unprovable theory?
We could ask the same question about Darwinism.
Why do Darwinists hold to the notion that Darwinism is literally true?
Could it be solely to challenge and call into question Revealed Truth?
All of this raises the social question of whether the proponents, champions and believers in the Darwinian purely faith-based "science" are true sophisticates, or easily duped buffoons and fools. Or worse.
Who am I to judge?
We have a question for any among the supposedly brilliant clerics, of whatever rank, who are able to blend Scripture and Darwinism in their minds and in their teaching:
Do you subscribe to the originalist-fundamentalist GESGOEAEOT2 Darwinist school of thought, or, do you hold to the more modern PEWAG3 theory, held by the most prominant among all of TTRSTF4 who have managed to convince you of their false belief system?
But, as a matter of fact, Di has some even more challenging questions for you over at Evolution is NOT compatible with Catholic Faith. As an ordained minister of the Catholic Church, you owe it to your flock and to yourself to go over there and answer her questions. For the sake of your soul, and the souls of your flock.
Go ahead. I dare you.
Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the gory details.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Wed Jul 05 18:48:26 2017
Another excellent resource is the Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation, directed by Mr. Hugh Owen in Mt. Jackson, Virgina. The website is >
Mr. Owen speaks on this topic at parishes and has some videos of them on YouTube...
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
and absolutely nothing else.
The Purpose of this group of links is to provide a repository for articles pertaining to the open fraud of Darwinian Evolution.
The Darwinism Pages
Natural Evolution of Species theory remains untested and even unobserved today, with no physical evidence supporting it, and must therefore be recognized as little more than an ideology, a silly superstition or a false religion.
Attacking Catholic Darwinism, from the purely Catholic perspective. This site has always challenged Darwinism from the purely scientific perspective. Now, we see another Catholic champion of Truth attacking Catholic Darwinism from Revealed Truth.
Mitochondrial Eve & Y-Chromosomal Adam v Darwinism and the "Natural" Homo. If all human DNA traces back to Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosomal Adam, then the religion of Darwinism and the "Naturalness" of the homosexual condition are both refuted.
Did the breakdown and loss of the Scientific-Method begin with Darwinism? In the Evolutionary Trail of Modern Scientism, Marxism points back to Freudianism, and farther back to Darwinism. Was that where Modern Man initially took Science off the rails?
Refuting Darwin and Dawinian “science” as bunk and silliness. Refuting Darwin is almost too easy due to his rush-to-publish and his complete lack of empirical evidences.
Refuting the Origin Of Species pseudo-scientific theory of Darwinism. If Darwinism’s Origin Of Species is a true Scientific Theory then there must be a preponderance of evidences supporting it. Show us any of it.
The definition of Darwinism in a nutshell. In the definition of Darwinism we find the foundational principles upon which the quest for the atheist holy grail: the purely material origin of life itself.
Darwinism: Darwin, Evolution, and the Devolution of the Scientific Method. Scientistic Materialism's cornerstone: Darwinism and the competing sub-theories of Gradualism and Punctuated Equilibrium.
Radiocarbon dating as an aging method is accurate up to a point. Radiocarbon dating is reliable up to 6,000 years, shaky at best up to 40,000 years, and completely useless beyond 70,000 years.
Silly premises built on crumbling foundations: Global Villageism & Evolutionism. The Dem Global-Villagers insist the US Constitution was written to cover all citizens of Earth; Disciples of Scientism and Evolutionism all genuflect before their high priest, Richard Dawkins.
Faith versus Atheism: Is atheism really just a silly superstition? The Faith versus Atheism argument is at the root of every other important argument.
On Evil and Nonsense: Look closely at Nonsense, and find Evil at its root. Evil and Nonsense: deny evil and you deny right vs. wrong; which is to deny common sense, which is to invoke nonsense.
Genetic Entropy: Pointing to Human Devolution, not Evolution. Genetic Entropy shows that mutants have less genetic material for variation, never more, falsifying evolution via "favorable" mutation.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston Churchill
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the