Formerly the Thinking Catholic Strategic Center
Today we see the anti Constituionalists gather for war against those who violate lesser laws. The Constitution itself may as well not even exist. But God help you if you violate any lesser law, most especially if it is an un-Constitutional law. And they'll really get after you if you dare to publicize the fact that they are all willingly, knowingly, voluntarily and purposely violating the Constitution.
Of course, what we're talking about here is the purely political use of the Patriot Act, the permanent recording of so-called "meta data" of every phone call ever made by any American citizen, and more. The permanence of this recording may be more dangerous to America than the actual recording. This presents a nearly irresistible tool of use in gaining political advantage, extortion, bribery and control of the citizenry. So, Rush is right; it all depends on who is doing it. However, there is another factor to consider:
But then, before we even get time to digest the implications of the seemingly unlimited scope of how the Patriot Act is being used (or abused) we get the leaked story of the PRISM project run by the NSA, leaked by the now fired and despised fugitive Edward Snowden. Through which we are informed that NSA has been permanently recording full content of every email, chat, browse, search - you name it. Every key-stroke you make on your computer. Or any computer, or device of any kind, that accesses the internet in any way.
Every internet hub on earth is owned and operated by - guess who - the NSA. What we are hearing about in the current PRISM brouhaha is only involving NSA communications between NSA and the internet biggees, like Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Apple, etc.; what we don't know, and may never know, is what they filter and record that goes through all the internet hubs under NSA control. Which is all of them.
We're talking about a top secret political gold mine. And, we're talking about a very dangerous tool of control if it ever falls into in the hands of any would-be ruthless dictator. Which it has.
Nothing to see here, there is no problem with the Patriot Act or with Prism. We are assured from on high that all of this is for our own protection against terrorism, which, depending on what day it is, doesn't even exist, or is a problem again. Even john Bolton got in on the act. He said, essentially, two important things. That Edward Snowden committed a crime, and that the Patriot Act was perfectly legal, since it had the full knowledge, consent, approval and cooperation of both houses of Congress and the administration.
Bolton's comments were a bit of a subterfuge since he was asked about unlegislated, top secret PRISM and offered a legal opinion about the properly legislated Patriot Act. John Boehner further revealed his own anti-Constitutionalism by calling snowden a traitor and defending PRISM as a necessary tool of defense against terrorism.
It is that attitude, held by men in power, that spells our national doom.
Is the Constitution a law, or not? That is what is at question here. If a law is on the books, and someone violates it, he commits a crime. If he willingly and knowingly commits a crime, he is a criminal. So it is of utmost importance to the American citizen to know whether or not the Constitution itself is law.
The Constitution says that it is law.
The Constitution identifies itself as the supreme law of the land. But, John Bolton said that the Patriot Act was perfectly legal, because both houses of Congress and the white house were willingly cooperating in its execution. Directly interpreted, that would mean that we are no longer a nation of laws; we have become just another nation of men.
The fourth Amendment means that we the people have a legally established civil right to be secure in our persons, private property and communications. I submit that that legal civil right is violated by our government every single time any American citizen goes through any airport TSA screening authorized under the Patriot Act. Every such instance is a criminal act; a crime against the Constitution, and against the American citizen.
The Patriot Act was un-Constitutional as passed by both houses of Congress and as signed by President Bush. As a violation of the Constitution, its very purpose for being is to allow the government to commit anti-Constitutional crime. In my view, the legislators and executive who made it law committed a criminal act, and it was doubly criminal, because they all took an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution. If it was done stupidly rather than with evil intent, then the stupidity certainly reached the level of complete incompetence in office. It was still a crime. If ignorance of the law is no excuse for us citizens, then what does ignorance of the law tell us about our current crop of highest office holders?
This is not the first time un-Constitutional law has been passed in America. Not by a long shot. I have railed against legislative, executive and judicial direct violations of the Constitution all over this site.
In my view, Edward Snowden behaved as he should have behaved in releasing this information. Any law or oath that he broke was an unlawful law or oath. Anyone who takes an oath to protect the Constitution is duty-bound and honor-bound to disobey any unlawful law or order, and anything that violates the Constitution is unlawful. The only question in my mind about Edward Snowden is if he has some undercover arrangement with Red China, since he took refuge in Hong Cong. We may not have the whole story, but I am glad we have this much of it.
Like all the other un-Constitutional laws we have spoken about herein, the Patriot Act awaits a President or a Congress with the balls to simply declare it to be un-Constitutional and therefore no law. All who have taken an oath to protect the Constitution are supposed to be prepared to do that.
Of course, that leaves out everyone today who is in high office.
Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
Culture=Religion+Politics; Who Are We? Vic Biorseth
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Tue Sep 02 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.
Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .
If you want to establish, launch and maintain an independent personally owned actual WebSite like this one, go to SBI! They will make a Web-Master out of you at the very least, and make you into an entrepreneur with your own business if that's your goal. You don't need any special skills or special knowledge, other than the topic of whatever your WebSite will be about.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
and absolutely nothing else.
Purpose of this grouping of links is to track and record distinctly anti-American political positions in political Parties and in the ideologically Marxist and anti-American news media.
The Anti-Americanism Pages
Virtually every position of the Marxocrat Party is in some way anti-American and/or anti-Christian. Note that anti-Christian, in and of itself, is anti-American. There is almost no part of the Marxocrat Party agenda that supports or strengthens and does not oppose the American Constitution, and the News Media is nothing more than a totally controlled wing or branch of the Marxocrat Party.
Government by Social Experiment or Constitutional Government: Choose. All government, whether ecclesial or temporal, may be seen to be morphing into Government by Social Experiment.
You Must Attack Anti-American Politics to Win American Political Wars. Any public direct attack on anti-American positions will always win, hands down. So why does no one ever do it?
America's current Anti-Constitution Constitutional Government. All three current branches knowingly violate the Constitution that created them, provided their rules and set their limits.
Do we have an Anti-American President? A Pro-Islam, Anti-Christian, Redistributionist, Utopian, Pro-Illegal Alien, quite consistently Anti-American, President Obama?
Political Parties: Redirecting allegiance away from the nation. Political Parties demand first obedience to the Party, not to the Constitution, slowly poisoning the nation.
Two Party Treason: Marxist Democrats Vs. Big Government Republicans. If both political Parties violate the Constitution in different ways, what we have is two Party treason.
Imagining a No Party America, with political Parties outlawed. When Political Parties oppose or do not defend the Constitution it is time for a No Party America.
New Way American Politics: Restoring and Advancing Cultural Americanism. A New Way of doing our Politics after anathematizing Political Parties, Marxism, Islam and Globalism.
Look at all the anti Constitutionalists - see how they run. See the anti Constitutionalists gather for war against those who violate lesser laws.
What to do with our anti-American Americans? Can America live with them? There are several variants of anti-American Americans who pose a serious threat from within.
How to incite class war in a classless society: First, Invent Faux Classes. Marxist Revolution needs a Class War, but Constitutional America prohibits nobility. Ergo, the Faux Classes of Marxism.
Faux Classes 2: Defining Social Classes by Income or Wealth. The Poor we will "NOT" always have with us? It just doesn't get any dumber than this. Faux Classes 2.
Treachery and Deceit: The Weapons of the Enemies Within. How Freedom of Speech opens the door to Anti-Free-Speech-Treachery in High Constitutional Political Office.
Twisting the Cultural Assimilation versus Cultural Segregation question. Natural cultural assimilation is for races and ethnicities; twisted cultural assimilation is for sin and evil.
Civilization versus Savagery: On Distinct Peoplehood. Civilization makes an identifiable civil People; savage, barbaric trends remove the distinction.
The Rise of Dominant Atheism, and with it, American and World Culture Rot. Culture Rot ensues once Human Culture predominantly worships only itself.
America's Extra-Constitutional Self Destructive Politics: Civilization's Doom. How all of our Presidential Candidates build up and support America's Self Destructive Politics.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston Churchill
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the