Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Replacing America, or eliminating America – what are the real intentions of America’s Democrat Party and other Marxist-leaning people who are always so antagonistic to her Declaration, her Constitution and her representative government?
All my life I’ve been hearing critics and detractors running America down, emphasizing her worst points, glossing over her finer points, re-interpreting her history in the most negative light, pretending her founders were actually evil, claiming she was being run by “the Jews” or “the Bourgeois” or “the Families” or some secret cabal or other evil entity.
If the intent is to replace the American system with something else, then, what is it to be replaced with?
That should be a very easy thing to describe, for those who intend to “improve” America. Nothing to it; just describe it. Go ahead. Let me see you do it.
America is already described, in beautiful detail, in her founding and constituting documents. America’s very Purpose For Being is beautifully described in the American Declaration of Independence. Exactly how America is constituted and governed is described in detail in the American Constitution. The Constitution is a very simple and straight-forward legal document, written in English, that says very specific legal things. You don’t need any law degree to be able to read and understand it.
So, we – meaning, we America-loving Constitutionalists – have our description of what we love, support, seek to improve and reinforce, primarily in these two brief, simple and straight-forward documents. They are small enough that a copy of both of them fits nicely in my shirt pocket, with lots of room left for a cell phone, a small pad of paper and a pen. Nothing to it. Easy to read, easy to defend.
So, where, pray tell, is the description of what America’s detractors would like to replace all that with? It seems to me that every time I ask one of them to describe it, they are flummoxed. They launch into another anti-American tirade, and have to be brought back to the point again, and again. They cannot describe what they would replace the American system with. They just know – they have been taught – that the American system is bad.
But, you see, they cannot come up with a replacement system. They are incapable of exercising Critical Thinking, because they have never been taught what that is, let alone how to apply it. They have been “educated” in what to think, rather than in how to think.
All of this proves that the typical anti-American is really little more than a simpleton, pretty much incapable of coming up with an original idea of any kind.
The really stupid ones will promote Marx’s invention, which is, of course Communist Utopia. The fact that Communism, as Marx described it, does not exist, has never existed, will never exist, and is quite impossible, is lost on them.
And, of course, there are the real idiots – the anarchists. All they “know” – or think they know – is that the system, like all systems, is bad, and must be destroyed. It’s what they were taught in school. Embedded in “public” education is the effort, invented by Eric Fromm and Abraham Maslow, to develop the new man known as the anti-authority Revolutionary. Here is their glowing description of this New Man:
That, my dear reader, is a description of an unhappy and unstable sociopath. I liken it to an isotope. An unbalanced atom is an unhappy atom – it will do something. Like an isotope, a sociopath will not merely stand there forever. Sooner or later, he will do something.
Now, this revolutionary “philosophy” born of the likes of Fromm and Maslow, and other Darwin-Freud-Marx – inspired anti-Americans such as John Dewey, is deeply imbedded in what is taught in teaching universities, most particularly Columbia University, where the educational elites would have us know that the best of the best public school teachers are taught how to teach. Public – i.e., government – education is, in reality, anti-American political indoctrination.
All those unthinking imbeciles you see walking around wearing Che Guevara T-shirts would love to see “The System” come crashing down, but they don’t have the foggiest clue as to what will come after that. They are not smart enough to even give it a thought.
If you truly hate America, give us an idea as to what might be a good replacement for her. I know it’s hard, and it requires thinking, but try. Give it a good, hard think, and let us know what you can come up with.
Otherwise, just shut the hell up.
Return to Latest page
Return to HOME PAGE
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Sun Jul 17 19:11:26 2011
Why did you stop the argument on your facebook page? It was just getting good and suddenly it disappeared. What are you afraid of?
I have looked at your site contents, and you seem to oppose scientific reality at every point. You deny the scientific theory of life, and you have your own theory on the beginning point of human life, in opposition to all scientists on the subject.
Do you even know what the term anal-retentive means? You should look it up; it applies to you.
Date: Mon Jul 18 06:06:50 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
While I do love a good argument, it is never profitable to argue with a fool. The guy on FaceBook did what all unprepared, provably wrong and yet obstinate people do in that situation: he turned to vulgarity and the ad hominem attack on the messenger rather than the message. I argue points of contention; I do not merely stand around and swap insults. When I blocked him, I didn’t know that blocking him would remove all the previous things he said; but that’s what happens in FaceBook, and whenever a conversation descends to that level, blocking the person is what I will resort to. I won’t have that kind of garbage on my own FaceBook wall.
Again, I fear nothing. I stand in the center of the open field with my rhetorical sword drawn. If you want to continue the argument, just step out here.
To what scientific theory of life do you refer? The beginning point of life? Show me the observations, the duplicable empirical evidence and the peer-reviewed independently verified experiments.
Regarding the beginning point of human life, what did the DNA say that the living sperm cell was? What did the DNA say that the living egg cell was? What did the DNA of the living Zygote cell say that it was? Human life does not begin, it is transmitted; it continues, until an event called extinction. What do you think is developing in the uterus of a pregnant woman? It’s not a particularly good place to grow potatoes, is it? What do you suppose it could possibly be if it is not alive and it is not human? Of course, if it was not alive, or if it was not human, then it would not be a human pregnancy, would it?
Regarding Freud’s theoretical five stages of development, including the anal retentive stage, like the rest of Freud’s half-baked theories, is just a lot of crap, like everything else in Freudianism. It sounds good, and it seems to answer a lot of questions.
If someone asks for your astrological sign and you lie and say that you are a Capricorn, an expected response may be “I knew it!” because, for many who follow astrology, everything makes sense only when put into astrological terms. They will force-fit you into the category that astrology says you belong in.
In a similar manner, many students read Freud’s stages of development for the first time, and suddenly, to them, everything makes sense, and they begin putting everyone they know into Freud’s little boxes, just as the fans of astrology put everyone into astrological boxes, because, suddenly, “it makes everything so clear!” to them.
But there is nothing to back it up other than Freud’s purely subjective “observations” of people – not from infancy, just from pure subjective theory. Never tested, never backed up by anything, and most certainly, not scientific by any stretch of the imagination.
You should look up the scientific method some time; you might be surprised at how often it was not used by the founders of great, recognized scientific theories.
Monday, March 04, 2013
Converted Page to SBI! Release 3.0 BB 2.0.
Note, March 04, 2013:
To those looking for FaceBook contact - I now avoid FaceBook almost at all costs. Having had my account hacked, my FaceBook ID hijacked, insults and vulgarities published, in my name and with my profile picture, on my wall and on friend's walls, and having received no help, support or even human contact with FaceBook, I no longer participate in what I consider to be dangerous FaceBook communications.
I apologize for not "friending" the many requests that come in. It started out with not wanting to "friend" anyone who's personal profile self-description information was limited to non-existent, because I do not choose to friend enemies of God or America. Finally, it wound up not trusting anyone who wants to be friends, because enemies of God and/or America are, after all, liars with ulterior motives that are not good.
All I do on FaceBook any more is post links to new articles as they are published on this site. I can do that from here.
Here, on this site, I have a lot more control. No one hacks into this site.
And, I just never did like Twitter.
Sorry, but that's the way it is.
Date: Mon Sep 29 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.
Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .
Language and Tone Statement
Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our
standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is.
If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elite Culturally Marxist Authoritarians will never tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their own pro-Marxist/anti-Christian/anti-American/Globalist/anti-Nation/immoral/anti-white/racist and bigoted point of view.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
Your email is perfectly secure here. We use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
Purpose for this grouping of links is to highlight the three natural
divisions, in philosophy, religion, morality and politics; what is
proper, what is disengaged and what must be defeated.
The Winnowing Pages
Ben Franklin described the division of the time as the Loyalists, the Rebels and the Mug-Whumps, with their Mugs hanging over one side of the fence, and their Whumps hanging over the other. Today, we have the Constitutionalists, the anti-Constitutionalists, and the Moron Vote.
The Three Sociological Divisions: The Faithful; The Disengaged; The Faithless. Those who stand in Truth, those who oppose Truth, and those who are Lukewarm toward Truth comprise the Three Sociological Divisions.
On the Cultural Menace of Massively Induced Stupidity. When you hear Leftist Leaders say something truly stupid, don't laugh. They are enlivening all the induced stupidity of their followers, and enraging your "revolutionary" conquerors.
There is a time appointed for everything; this is the time of winnowing. We must politically winnow, to separate into good grain, useful straw, and useless flammable chaff.Against political moderation: America was not founded by indecisive moral wimps.
Political Moderation provides neither leadership nor opposition, but merely a moral drag that historically prolongs moral debates and ends up hurting morality.
Blessed Polarization & Political Division: what America desperately needs today. Lord, give us blessed polarization, a line drawn in the sand and a polarizing leader like Sarah Palin to lead us back to American sanity.
America’s return to faith in God is now a matter of American national survival. If America does not return to faith in God, no return to “conservatism” will save her; it will only prolong her death agony.
Faith versus Atheism: Is atheism really just a silly superstition? The Faith versus Atheism argument is at the root of every other important argument.
Constitutional America: The argument for a return to basic rule of law. The arguments for a return to the Constitutional America intended by the Fathers and expected by the People through their Representative Government.
Atheizing America - we sit, seemingly mesmerized, merely watching it happen. Among all Leftist agendas, the atheizing America agenda is the one we seem to notice the least. Like deer in the headlights, we just stand there and watch.
A fatal false premise is a deadly logical trap for the mal-educated person. A Fatal false premise with broad general consensus will always trump reason, evidence and critical thinking.
The World says: Faith Versus Reason. The Spirit says: Faith And Reason. Choose. Is it possible to be a man of faith and reason simultaneously? Or is true faith exclusively reserved for dumb hillbillies, bible-thumping zealots, and unthinking cradle traditionalists?
Behold the Masters of Hypocrisy who denigrate us and highlight their own shame. Good Leadership, for the Masters of Hypocrisy, means Surrender to the World and Follow The Mob.
Of all the dumb-assed ideas in the world, the dumbest is The Equality Stupidity. The Equality Stupidity takes the prize for the most imbecilic of all ideologies.
On Replacing America: Do detractors seek replacement, or destruction? Replacing America, or destroying America - what do Democrats and other fundamental Marxists want to do to America?
Even the very best among us can be fooled into blessing abomination. In blessing abomination we show how we have been mesmerized by the slyest of lies.
Are right and wrong always black and white, or are there shades of grey? There is the Spirit (the Kingdom), the Flesh (the World), and You. Love unites (or divides) you to one of them, and Love is Black and White. Always.
Holy Evil defines Bishops who teach and preach Falsehood. Water and Oil; Fire and Ice; Truth and Falsehood; Catholicism and Communism; Holy and Evil; They do not mix. Or do they?
Our Many Maliciously Fabricated and Purposely Induced Cultural Delusions. Cultural-Marxism + Freudianism + Multiple Crises + Many Years Abuilding = Multiple Cultural Delusions.
Thou shalt not Discriminate, lest thou commit the Newest Mortal Sin of Man. Let us unite all Humanity in Indiscriminate Behavior, knowing that all who still Discriminate delay the human development of Perfect Worldly Utopia. Let us make our own Heaven right here on earth.
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the