Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, OWM; Friday,
April 25, 2014
See how quickly they can turn.
Rancher Cliven Bundy got everyone's attention in a one-man stand-off against the extra-Constitutional BLM, which should not even exist in the first place. The BLM (Bureau of Land Management) is just another administrative Soviet (i.e., Bureaucracy) established by government to "administer" us into ever increasingly narrow areas of human behavior, ostensibly for our own good. Or maybe for the good of the planet.
Or maybe, more likely, for the increase of government power over the people. To get the citizenry more used to being herded and told what to do. To keep them calm as they are herded along.
Across multiple centuries Bundy's family has free-ranged cattle in that area, as the nation grew up. Laws charging fees for free-range usage during the territorial era were superseded by Statehood, and with Statehood, sovereignty of the land changed.
I'm not going to get into the weeds of what laws are valid, invalid or superseded by history, because I don't really understand it nearly as well as Cliven Bundy does, and he is not exactly the most articulate or well spoken man. I am willing to leave it to him and his neighbors. Others will have to figure the standing legalities out.
The instant Racial Prejudice entered the picture, everybody, to a man, turned on Cliven Bundy. Suddenly, nothing else mattered. Among Liberal whites, and even among cowed and brow-beaten, guilt-ridden Conservative whites, the one and only unforgivable sin is racial prejudice. In a heartbeat, they all turned on him. Instantly. Without looking into it any further. This quite sudden and seemingly universal turn is what inspired these words.
On Prejudice. I submit that prejudicial preferences are so common among all peoples as to be considered natural. That goes for religious preferences, ideological preferences, philosophical preferences, racial preferences, sexual preferences, national preferences, city-versus-country preferences, literary preferences, and the list goes on and on.
If you prefer the company of like-appearing people, or like-minded people, or classic-music loving people, etc., there nothing particularly bad about that. It is a natural thing. It is your nature.
There is a point at which racial preference crosses a line and becomes racism. Racism is here defined as animosity toward another race, or a sense of racial superiority over another race. As such, racism is nonsensical, since it cannot empirically be shown that any whole race is superior to any other.
What the Marxocrat Party sponsored Political Correctness Movement has done with that is blur the line between prejudicial preference - i.e., simple prejudice - and racism. Today, to call someone prejudiced is equivalent to calling them racist. Prejudice itself is made illegal in many jurisdictions. Many have been successfully sued for displaying simple prejudicial preference, as if they had actually done something involving racial animus, or causing injury of some sort.
It's all part of getting us all used to being herded.
As in nearly all other forms of prejudicial personal preference, racial prejudice is particularly demonized among Caucasians, and even more particularly among American Caucasians. This is one of the greatest success stories of the whole Political Correctness Movement. Remember, all of this is sponsored by the Marxocrat Party. You cannot fully demonize "the American system" and virtually all of American history without demonizing the American white man.
Perfection is not of this world, but the next. You've probably heard that about a million times. However, today, the same Journalists, Pundits and Commentators who are telling the Cliven Bundy story on the air, on the internet and in print, would have us (and themselves) believe that they have personally achieved perfection, in that there is not one shred of prejudice in them. Unlike so many of all those lesser white Americans, they are, or they would have us believe they are, absolutely color-blind.
Note well that, in their view, exhibiting racial prejudice is a lesser sin for any non-white race, as it is for any non-American white. (The real Marxocrat goal here is to demonize America herself, as the greatest historical success story of unfettered free market capitalism.) However, for any white American, displaying any kind of preference for your own race, in any way, is today a mortal sin in the new national religion of Political Correctness. It is unforgivable, unpardonable and intolerable, everywhere you look.
But only for white Americans, who are now supposed to be perfect. As the Journalists, Pundits and Commentators all view themselves.
You have probably heard, a million times, phrases like "We have (or we are supposed to have) risen above racial prejudice today", or, "We used to be a racist people, but no more", or, "Once racism was prevalent here, but we have pushed it into the extremist corners of society", and others like them.
Well, if you say things like that, please leave me out of your "we".
America was never a totally racist nation, and American whites were not and are not any more racist than any other race in any other land in any other era.
The first Dutch slave ship to land in the Colonies sparked the abolition movement in the hearts of white American men. Shocked and disgusted Colonists acted to pass laws against any forced or involuntary servitude right up front, only to have them overturned by the Crown. We have talked about this in more detail all over this site. The legality of forced slavery imposed upon the Colonies by England began an economic war, between the slavers and the ordinary employers, with the slavers taking grand advantage of not having to pay for labor.
This economic war gave rise to the Plantation, and to a new rich class of Americans called the Planters, many of whom became super rich. Remember, America was founded, and later Constituted, as the first "classless" nation, where all men stood equal before the law. Now, we had two entirely new classes of men: Planters and Slaves. It all culminated in the Civil War, which was waged by white men against their own white brothers to free black men from bondage. No other people ever did such a thing, ever in history.
The American Civil War was clearly the act of an anti-racist nation.
Before it became the Marxocrat Party, the Democrat Party was the Party of the Planters, the Slavers, the Klan, the Segregationists and the opposition to black and other minority civil rights. Now, as the Marxocrat Party, it has morphed into the white sugar-daddy Santa Clause Party for black America, falsely and successfully demonizing Lincoln's and Martin Luther King Jr.'s Republican Party as being racist, among other evils.
Cliven Bundy's remarks on "the negro" and how they were instantly interpreted revealed a severe language barrier between Cliven Bundy and the Journalists, Pundits and Commentators who all gasped in horror at the very first words. As far as the language he speaks, to them, he might as well be from Mars. They can't come close to understanding him on this topic, particularly after their many years of super-saturation in false American history, white guilt and anti-prejudice indoctrination. Why?
Cliven Bundy lives close to the earth. Today, you might not be able to get closer to the earth than he lives. Ranchers and Farmers of almost all kinds differ from other kinds of workers or businessmen in that they are the originators of food. Every other kind of work is removed from originating food. The more removed someone is from it - from the land, from the livestock, from the constant attention required - the less someone will fully understand it. It's a way of living and a way of communicating that are understood by other ranchers and farmers, almost exclusively. Whether they all agree with Bundy's remarks or not, at least they properly understand them.
The Journalists, Pundits and Commentators who are horrified by Bundy's words live so far from the earth that many of them may seldom if ever see it. They travel in elite circles of sophisticates and sophists in the rarefied atmosphere of high society. They are paid megabucks to look nice and speak well on camera while reading the "news" from a teleprompter, and do it all with the highest levels of political correctness. It's a whole other language, to people like Cliven Bundy. They will likely never fully understand each other.
Let's look at what Bundy said.
Of course, "the negro" got instant, automatic painting of Bundy as a racist. Why, who else but a racist would imply that it is possible to make any blanket statement whatsoever about a whole race?
Well, how about an anthropologist? Would you agree that a blanket statement regarding skin pigmentation could be made about the negro race, with empirical evidence to back it up? Are we all now supposed to pretend that races don't exist, and never refer to a race by name again?
But it could be argued that Bundy was talking about the Negros he saw while driving past some inner city housing project. Not quite a whole race, but possibly or even probably representative of most of the nation's inner-city black neighborhoods, and the ninety-something percent of the guaranteed black Marxocrat vote. Never mind; he had said "the negro" and that is unforgivable by today's politically correct standards, and no Journalist , Pundit or Commentator, whether they call themselves Liberal or Conservative, will ever let something like that go by. Why, they were all appalled. Right on queue.
(Hint: they've been taught to be appalled. Git along, little doggies.)
Were cotton-picking slaves better off? When Bundy wondered aloud if some of these people were better off picking cotton as slaves than the way they are now, the elitist Journalists, Pundits and Commentators went into apoplectic shock. Why, the horror of it. In their view, Bundy was so ignorant that he had no idea how horrible conditions were for slaves on the cotton plantations, universally. He thought they were happier as slaves than now as totally dependent social leaches. But more than the language barrier came into play here, because he never said happier; what he said was better off. The elites don't know the difference; to them, you are only better off when you are happier.
What did it mean when he said "they never learned how to pick cotton" ?
The slaves lived close to the earth, like Cliven Bundy and many of the farmers and the ranchers of today. They knew how to make the earth produce, and they knew how to work. Among other things, they produced food. The slaves didn't just pick cotton; they planted it, irrigated it, fertilized it and watched over it. They prepared and maintained the ground, and did everything necessary to bring forth a good crop.
The slavers learned early on that they didn't even have to feed their slaves, because their slaves were perfectly capable of feeding themselves. Given their own plots of land, some chickens, goats, pigs and milk cows, they took care of feeding themselves. "Share Cropping" by slaves and by free men of color began long before slavery ended. Even where that wasn't done, a share of the produce of the land went to feed the slaves, and the slaves were the ones who produced the produce in the first place. They knew how to do it. And there are American black farmers out there today who produce cotton, among other crops.
Could they have been happier? Remember, Bundy said "better off", and it was the Journalists, Pundits and Commentators who said "happier". They have been indoctrinated into a one-size-fits-all image of the horrors of living life as a slave. But I would venture to guess that Blessed Pierre Toussaint lived a happy life as a slave, and it might be a good guess that George Washington's slave and dear friend Will Lee was a happy man.
How happy are the inner city ghetto blacks? Is it an ignorance-is-bliss happiness, or a genuine happiness?
As far as "better off" goes - beginning with the Lyndon Johnson administration, American blacks have been converted from human capital producing wealth, into dependent mouths-to-feed consuming wealth, even as the previously strong black family disintegrated into virtual non-existence. By plan.
And there were strong black families in the slavery days, some with stronger family bonds than white families. Even the earliest slaves, brought over on ships, often came with stronger taboos than Christianity against such things as incest and other sexual crimes. If a slave abused his or another child, his owner might have had to sell him far away, before his fellow slaves killed him for it.
After the Civil War and Emancipation, there were many heart-rending epic tales of ex-slaves wandering the land searching for spouses, children, parents and other relatives, sometimes successfully, sometimes not, for a lifetime. To be sold apart from family was, for many slaves, worse than being flogged to death. Family was everything. It was all they had.
What is it today?
What happens when the system crashes? What do the inner city blacks do when the city runs out of money, lays everyone off, cuts the water off, the dollar is worthless, fuel is so expensive trucks cannot deliver, homes cannot be heated, there is no electricity and Kroger is out of food? Do any of them still know how to butcher a hog or slaughter a chicken? Do they even have a hog or a chicken? What happens after the last store is looted and burned down?
Well, they learn what the word famine means.
And what do the Journalists, Pundits and Commentators do when suddenly the pantry is empty and even their megabucks cannot get a loaf of bread delivered, because there is no more delivery possible, and there is no fuel for the Ferrari? Can any of them even imagine how to do a simple thing like slaughter a chicken, assuming they could even find one?
Since total economic collapse is just one obviously predictable end Obamunism and the Marxocrat Party is seeking to achieve, in their "fundamental transformation" of America, it would seem logical and reasonable that people should be preparing for it now. Unless they just can't believe it. Unless they have been so divorced from the good earth that they don't think they need it. Unless they have become so aloof and "sophisticated" that they now look down on the farmers, ranchers, cow boys and hill-billies as simple country bumpkins not worthy of much more than ridicule, mockery and contempt.
The Cliven Bundys - the ranchers and the farmers - have been through this before. They have had bad years, and multiple bad years back-to-back, and survived. If they cannot bring their food to market for whatever reason, they will eat and preserve much of it. Ranchers and farmers are heavily experienced in getting through hard times. It's what's called being better off. They know what to do.
They have wells and springs on their land, they have fire wood, they hunt and fish to supplement their tables, and they bide their time and tend their land and their livestock as best they can. Eventually, things will get better. Even during hard times, things are always a bit calmer for those who are close to the earth and who are the originators of food.
As for the inner city blacks, and as for the Journalists, Pundits and Commentators who are electronically crucifying Cliven Bundy in the news - well, they don't even see it coming. They don't even know that they are already being politically herded.
Git along, little doggies.
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)
Return to Latest News page
Return to HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Sat Apr 26 12:25:52 2014
WOW! You have done it again! I must forward this to so many college-aged people I know. They are thinkers ... they are Catholic ... they are liberally educated seeking Truth, Goodness and Beauty! Thanks for all you do! God bless you and your family! Happy Easter!
Date: Sat Apr 26 13:04:26 2014
From: Andrew Etchen
Location: Ontario, Canada
Is it just a matter of time when they declare that those who are deemed racist, are dangerous, and should therefore, be separated from normal society? I suppose the opposite is possible, that those who govern with a Marxist agenda could one day be deemed dangerous and guilty and be separated from normal society. If the Marxist could impose their will & vision upon others, then others could impose their will & vision upon them, all the same.
Is it true that Adolf Hitler despised Marxism? Is it true, that Adolph Hitler was most conscious of the importance of the food supply and the farmer? Is it true that he placed great importance on the family, especially the children? Is it also true, that "Mein Kampf" is the second most read book in the Middle East after the Koran? Why is that? Why is Vladimir Putin actively strengthening and promoting family, and Christianity? Why is Christianity being systematically dismembered here in America? Is it possible to live amongst your countrymen, while knowing that many of them are your enemy? Where do you go to in this world to find sanity and peace? Is there an island or country that could be better? If Our Lady of Fatima is ignored, could it be in our Godly interest to abandon this demise known as America and go to Russia and help promote what we know is good? Is it possible to say that the satanic stranglehold over America is so tight, we have no choice but to flee? Or do we just stay put, and talk it out some more, and hopefully somebody will do something.
Date: Sat Apr 26 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Hitler demonized Communism as one of the enemies of the state to eliminate. Naziism / Fascism differed from Communism only in that they controlled the owners of industry and supplied slave labor for them, while Communism took direct state control of all industry and drafted industrial armies. Both were Marxist at the core.
You raise very serious questions, and the only logical answers point to a world upside down.
Date: Sun Apr 27 12:01:56 2014
Location: Wyoming, PA
Same old U.S. propaganda machine at work. You know, I actually did a reality check as I wrote that sentence. We are almost completely through the Looking Glass. However, I was wondering if you identify the source for the section on how the American colonists passed laws against the slave trade and were overturned by the British Crown. I checked your reference section but was not successful. BTW it seems that we have read many of the same books.
Date: Sun Apr 27 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Well, you may have stumped me here.
Going through the old, old material I used as I wrote and rewrote an early treatment of official Catholic teaching on forced slavery, and I have yet to find that particular source. It was all painstakingly put together around 1999 in response to "official" false teaching I received in the Cincinnati Archdioces's Athenaeum of Ohio Lay Pastoral Ministry Program courses. It was a response, or a counter-argument used against multiple Professors in that program.
A summarized version of that treatment of the subject would eventually morph into the Slavery page on this website, around 2005 or so. What I found among my original source material was this:
It may be that the reason the "outlaw" didn't appear in law was that it was overridden and never became law. A quick internet search came up dry.
I remember that I argued the points put forth in the slavery page strenuously against multiple professors, and none of them challenged that point.
Sorry, John; that's the best I can do on short notice. I'll keep looking.
Date: Sun Aug 17 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.
Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .
Language and Tone Statement
Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our
standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is.
If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elite Culturally Marxist Authoritarians will never tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their own pro-Marxist/anti-Christian/anti-American/Globalist/anti-Nation/immoral/anti-white/racist and bigoted point of view.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
Your email is perfectly secure here. We use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
This group of links
show articles exposing the infiltration of evil into the Church, larger
Christianity, the American government, Political Parties, the larger
Culture, and Western Civilization
The Infiltration of Evil Pages
Showing how Evil advances in culture by one little "accommodation" at a time, to the point where supposedly good men of high stature eventually come to support it under other names, through corrupted language.
On Cultural Desensitization to Strategies of Cultural Destruction. The systematic psychological desensitization of a nation's citizenry to the reality of mortal threats to nations.
The Infiltration of Evil Pages highlight the hidden advance of our cultural destruction. Mighty nations, invincible in battle, may be taken down by slow parasitic infiltration of evil.
On the Coming Total Global Reset. This Global Reset will touch every aspect of human life, and nothing will be the same again.
Gay Marriage: What the hell is gay about it? It isn't Gay Marriage, it's Homosexual Marriage. If you surrender the language you lose.
Disorder and Confusion from the White House. And from the Vatican, too? The growing disorder in Obama's America, and in Pope Francis' Catholic Church.
The "Top Down" Catholic Revolution by Bishops Against Established Doctrine. The "Bottom Up" Catholic Revolution by Laymen For Established Doctrine.
Anathematizing anathema: the predictable result of the denial of evil. In a world that denies the existence of evil, anathematizing anathema itself is the only anathema allowed.
On Glorious Adult Judgmentalism, and Our Disastrous Loss Of It. The desire to "Find Common Ground" precipitates our slow, steady, sure decline into pure evil.
The Grand Conspirators, gathering riches and power through treachery and deceit. The Grand Conspirators behind collapsing currencies, environmental panic, social revolution and the end of nations.
Farewell America? No friendly nation will bid "Farewell America" as we go under, for all friendly nations will be too preoccupied with their own deadly emergencies.
American Faith: What it was in the beginning, what it is now, what it should be. If Modern American Faith is not to be Christian, then, what exactly is it to be? Nothingness?
The cultural road to Sodom: Wide, smooth, straight and downhill all the way. Asking the questions, is America already the New Sodom, and is there any way back to simple decency?
Property = Wealth = A Penny Saved = A Fundamental Human Civil Right. Wealth Redistribution = confiscating private property from those who earned it to benefit those who did not earn it.
What does income inequality, or any inequality, have to do with morality? When did we become so stupid? Income inequality, wealth gaps, etc., are not moral issues.
Imperfect Cliven Bundy v. all the Perfect White Commentators. Perfection is not of this world, but the next; unless you're a White Journalist, Pundit or Commentator.
The Class Warfare Lies of "Social Justice" infecting theology and philosophy. Most every time Social Justice is invoked, you are about to hear some Class Warfare Lies.
Decision Point: Will You (We) Stand in Truth, or Lay Down with The World? The exact same Decision Point at which Nineveh was saved, and Sodom and Gomorrah were lost.
On Common Law and the Constitution. What, exactly, is Common Law?
The Contraception Perversion: The Deep Root Cause of All Sexual Perversions. Every form of sexual perversion has its roots in the original perversion of Artificial Contraception.
How many "Practicing" Catholics are really only Lip Service Catholics? Lip Service Catholics like to look Catholic and sound Catholic, but they are fraudulent Catholics.
"Unfettered Capitalism" does not exist; so why is the term so popular? Unfettered Capitalism is a nonsensical term. The moment it is fettered it is no longer Capitalism.
Do detractors even know what Trickle Down economic theory is? Those who condemn Trickle Down economic theory either don't understand it, or they are trying to fool someone.
Marching nations into the Great Collective under the banner of Social Justice. Does Social Justice mean collective property, collective labor, collective rights and collective salvation?
Presenting Yankee Economics to Ranking Catholic Churchmen and others unfamiliar. Yankee Economics 101: A light description for those who never experienced it.
Wayward bishops and complicit journalists corrupted Catholic culture. Evil grew as a leaven in the clergy and corrupted Catholic culture from within.
Establishment Democrats, Establishment Republicans, and Establishment Bishops? Supposedly Catholic, Inside-the-Beltway, Big Government, Progressive, Establishment Bishops.
On the Objective Reality of God, Objective Reality versus Subjective Empiricism, which holds that Reality is subject to Human Perception.
Death to the Church of Nice. Long Live the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
Religion in Culture: the vitally important factor no longer recognized today. Secularists oppose religion in culture. But then, secularists oppose both religion and culture.
Cardinal Dolan's Church of Sodomy: destroying New York Catholicism from the top. Cardinal Dolan is doing to New York Catholicism exactly what Comrade President Obama (peace be upon him) is doing to Constitutional America.
The Culture of Death always wears a false but alluringly innocent smiley face. The Culture of Death, where Madam Hillary loves Scripture and your Living Will won't necessarily kill you.
Thinking of Bai MacFarlane and the upcoming Synod on the Family. Whatever emanates from the Synod, the Bai MacFarlane family tragedy brings it all into proper focus.
Incremental Tyranny advances as we Tea Party-ers cheer our imagined victories. How we always greet more Incremental Tyranny with a cheer, a whoop and a happy-dance.
Catholic American Treason: Bishops join Republcrats in Obamunist treason. Bishops participate in the destruction of American sovereignty, in acts of Catholic American Treason.
On The Evil One's Mal-Formed Compassion and Malignant Mercy. In malignant mercy we see that evil and untruth can infiltrate and commandeer even the virtues.
Promoting Moral Depravity: the popular sport of the intellectual elites. Almost no one knows they are promoting moral depravity, but almost everyone is.
The Pathological Liars of the Left. What do common criminals, Marxists and Moslems have most in common? They are all pathological liars.
Disinformation differs from miss-information by being deliberate and deceptive. Deliberate Disinformation moves America and the World deeper and deeper into error.
Evil is, definitively, Falsehood; Evil is the Opposite of permanent Truth. Evil convincingly argues Religion out of Politics in this temporary, passing world, where Satan reigns.
On the Stupidity of Evil, and the Connection between Evil and Stupidity. Evil is Opposition to God, and Opposition to God is just Glaring Stupidity.
Truth Denial: Über-elitist, high intellectual, super sophisticated Stupidity. Evil = Falsehood; the opposite of Truth. It is not possible to oppose reality and not be stupid.
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the