Formerly the Thinking Catholic Strategic Center
Site best viewed on a computer screen - not optimized for cell phones
Latest 50 articles published or updated here: BLOG (Web-Log) Page
Vic Biorseth, Thursday, August 05, 2021
The one common thread that runs through elitist pseudo-intellectual thought is the secret desire to establish thought control. To get everyone to agree with the elitist position or belief, point by point. After all, is not the anti-authoritarian argument itself authoritarian?
What we are talking about here is the authoritarian limitation of thought.
It isn't just speech control and press control; it's actual thought control.
In the view of the elites, there will be no free thinking or free thought.
Popular "me-too" thought always morphs into domination of thought.
When Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door inviting debate, it was certainly new and different, and all the me-too pseudo-intellectuals jumped on it and began seriously discussing it, as if it were serious and not silly and stupid. That was October 31 1517. The bloodshed that followed didn't end until the 1648 treaty of Westphalia ending the Thirty Years War. That's 131 years of warfare, initiated by Luther against the both the Catholic Church and the Holy Roman Empire, and then began to split, first, by Munser who opposed everything: the Empire, the Church, and Luther. (See Luther and Munzer.)
Between those two dates, the 1555 Peace of Augsburg established the principle that the secular ruler of the land would establish and control the official state religion of that land, putting royalty and nobility in charge of the religion of their choice, between Catholicism and Lutheranism.
But, secular rulers being what they are, they carried it a step farther and began incorporating other religions that were breakaways from Lutheranism, and the religious wars continued, as spoken of in the Fracturing of Christianity. Royal Nobility was using religion as an excuse to seize property and land by force of arms, and to expand their own domains.
When it all finally ended in 1648, there was no freedom of religion in Europe. Quite the opposite. Your religion was the religion of your noble or he would have your head. It was to avoid the religious oppression of this new Protestant radical combination of Church and State that in 1620 the first Pilgrims colonized America, looking for freedom to worship in their own freely chosen religion. Note well that they, Protestants though they were, were being religiously oppressed by other Protestants, and not by Catholics.
What started out as an adult tantrum against Papal authority and a quest for freedom from Catholic rules ended up with dictatorial new religions brutally dominating the worship of whole nations of citizens.
And, eventually, the 40,000 plus and still growing number of established Protestant 'denominations', all born of the sola scriptura and sola fidei original Lutheran heresies. (See the Are You Saved page.)
What can I say? Marxism - Communism as Marx defined it (and he is the one who actually wrote the Manifesto) is just too stupid for words. It is a lie. Everything Marx said, in his manifesto, in his Das Kapital, and anywhere else, was a lie. It calls for the destruction of everything that exists; he said so; he was quite open about it. He called for the "forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions" and for the absolute abolishment of "the present state of things".
It just doesn't get any nuttier (or more evil) than that.
But note that it begins with the abolishment of religion. Where Protestantism, which may have started out trying to take over Catholicism and establish Luther as Pope or something, it would up fracturing Christianity into what we see today - the Catholic Church, and untold tens of thousands of Protestant denominations.
Marx just took it to the next step, and denied the whole enchilada. After all, he was calling for the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions, and Christianity, even including all of it's truly wild Protestant diversity, was an existing social condition.
Marxism-Communism, under the mask of Utopian idealism, is an evil strategy aimed at fomenting violent revolution aimed at the eventual assumption of absolute dictatorial power under the guise of "Socialism". If you want to understand Marxism, read who Marx read, and that would be Machiavelli and Hegel.
Machiavelli developed the 'politics' of purposely sowing social disorder, lawlessness and chaos in order to come riding in to the rescue, to re-establish order, and thereby assume the thrown to the cheers of the surviving citizens who desperately needed to be saved from the disorder, lawlessness and chaos.
Hegel developed the long-term political stratagem of politics by crisis. The utilization of real or imaginary crises to grow the government in size and authority, while shrinking the independence of the citizenry and increasing their dependency on the government, without the citizenry knowing what was going on. The Hegelian dialectic is a top-down, inside-job stratagem because it is secretly run by seditious agents inside the government itself, or in some position influencing the government to take "emergency" action, crisis by crisis. The ultimate Hegelian goal is the same as the goal of Machiavellianism: the eventual assumption of absolute dictatorial power.
Marxism is a politics of,
When the Communist Manifesto was published to the world in 1848 it touched off the first "Springtime Of Revolution" in which violent, bloody revolutions, all of which failed, raged all across Europe. None succeeded because none were, in truth, 'popular'; all were started by trickery and deceit, but none ever enjoyed popular support, and so all eventually failed. But not without the loss of untold thousands of lives.
And it all started out, once again, as an eliteist, pseudo-intellectual hyped popular fad topic, at the top of society, not the bottom. It was the hot topic under serious discussion among the intellectuals of society.
And it was just as stupid then as is is now.
Marxism-Leninism was described by Professor Libor Brom in Marxist Fundamenals. It is the Marxist stratagem of advancing through disinformation and deception. Preaching "peaceful coexistence" and "mutual disarmament" while secretly growing armament and building a war machine.
Marxism-Leninism deceives nations by pushing international friendship, pacifism, peace movements and anti-war sentiments, all while plotting the destruction of nations. It was a slow and steady selling of Socialism as a superior form of government over all other forms.
While doing all this it still sends agents and support to foment revolutions in other lands. No one knew that Fidel Castro was actually a Marxist-Leninist until he announced it after he took over Cuba. Marxism is very sneaky that way.
Both Hitler and Mussolini were Marxist-Socialists. Mussolini had been an editor of a Socialist newspaper before his rise to power. Rather than seizing all corporate power and property, Nazi-Fascism merged with it and used it to their own benefit, while still opposing the independent-thinking of the bourgeois shopkeepers and imposing communal thinking on the citizenry.
The captains of industry and oligarch wannabes benefited from the merger with government by, first, being allowed to survive, and second, by being occasionally supplied with slave labor as needed to produce what the dictator ordered, in the quantity and quality demanded. And, like the dictator, they could still be rich.
Cultural Marxism, or sneaky-underhanded Marxism, got started with Stalin's Popular Front, soon followed by the Frankfurt School. Marxist-Freudians, or Freaudian-Marxists, started the Sexual Revolution and the whole make-love-not-war so-called Free Love movement.
In intellectual circles it promoted globalism and New World Order politics of George Soros, John McCain, Henry Kissinger, Billary and Hillary Clinton, Bush 41 and bush 43, Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) and thundering herds of other famous Americans of all Parties and persuasions.
This is not to say that Bush 41 and Bush 43 were not good and decent men; it is to say that they, like many, were fooled (or so we can hope), perhaps all of their lives, by high sounding titles like New World Order, which were merely among the legion of false-front titles camouflaging the reality of the same old COMINTERN, or International Communism.
It was Cultural Marxism, and not anything else, and no altruistic motive to save man or any subset of humanity from anything else, that gave birth to the Femi-Nazi movement, the Homo-Nazi movement, the Eco-Nazi movement, the Racial-Nazi movement, the Immigrant Nazi movement, the Femi-Nazi Green Beret movement, the Openly Homo Military movement, and the normalizing, through corrupted education and corrupted news reporting, of every sexual perversion known to man.
Marxism always seems to be able to fool if not recruit the elites and the intellectuals easier than it can ever fool or recruit the ordinary citizenry.
But what is worse is that Marxism can destroy faith and 'demoralize' a moral people with shocking ease, and soon have them defending the indefensible, championing sin and evil, and - get this - anathematizing those who anathematize sin and evil, and even crime. And doing it all very, very emotionally, and with feeling.
Feelings are displacing thinking. By plan.
Just publicly threaten to abolish the criminally established unconstitutional 'legality' of abortion, and watch what happens.
Mark Levin was quite right, brilliant even, to title his new best selling book American Marxism, because it is a unique form of Marxism, which is different from all the former forms and branches, and yet incorporates them all into itself. It is perfect for taking down Constitutional America; so perfect that it appears to have one single-minded architect that brought it all together.
Revolutionary Communism was morphed into Community Organizing by two evil Marxist organizers, George Soros and Saul Alinsky. Under their funding and organizing, Communism went underground and inside of all existing institutions. It wasn't as much getting the rabble to storm the Bastille, although it is doing that; it was also organizing organizations to death from the inside. It was an attack on structural ideas that formed institutions, like the USA, and destroying the ideas themselves, in the minds of many or most of those most dedicated to the foundational ideas, without letting them know what they were doing.
And, having infiltrated the organizations, take them over completely. As was done to the Marxocrat Party, and then, through the Marxocrat Party, the actual running of the American government itself, quite outside of the Constitution.
Building unconstitutional law on top of unconstitutional law, and building unconstitutional regulating bureaucracy on top of unconstitutional regulating bureaucracy.
It is the smooth use of PSYOPS, by which the anti-Communist sentiment is destroyed, and the pro-American sentiment is destroyed along with it. It is the psychology that morphed the Democrat Party into the anti-American Marxocrat party we see today, and that keeps the Republicrat Party convinced that the Marxocrat Party is something reasonable that can be dealt with on the up and up.
At this moment in American history, there is not one thing the Marxocrat Party - which dominates the House, the Senate, the Presidency, the Federal Bureaucracy and the Court - there is not one single thing it does and there is no political agenda it pushes that does not harm Constitutional America in some way and contribute to the ultimate destruction of Constitutional America.
The Marxocrat Party absolutely hates America and is more and more open about it. They prove it in everything they do. They hate America's history, her monuments, her flag, her anthem, her borders, her Christianity, her Constitution, her citizen's legal rights, her morality, her laws, her rule of law, her guaranteed sovereignty of states, her local law enforcement, and her very form of government. What they hate most of all is the fact that they are not in total tyrannical rule over all of America right now, as Castro was in Cuba, and as they are absolutely determined to eventually rule here.They are American Marxists. They are died-in-the-wool MEJTML14 s. The truth is not in them. They will have nothing to do with the Truth.
The news media, the entertainment industry, the social media platforms and internet search engines are all united behind the monolithic message of the evil Marxocrat Party. Anti-Americans have freedom of speech; pro-Americans do not. Sodomites and sexual perverts have freedom of speech; but no one may say one word against them, or even use words like sodomy or perversion. Minorities have freedom of speech, but white people do not. Women can criticize men, but men dare not say one word offensive to any woman.
The elites have moved all points of argument out of the realm of intellect and into the realm of emotion. Forget intellectual argumentation. Its all about feelings now. Unconstitutional though this notion may be, everyone now has a 'right' to not have their feelings hurt, or be offended in any way, or suffer criticism for anything.
Our speech - but not theirs - may not offend anyone.
But that's precisely what First Amendment freedom of speech intends to protect: the very speech that may offend someone. Constitutionally, that's exactly what you, as an American citizen, are expected to do.
Do not let them shut you up; never apologize for speaking the truth.
The problem is that the cure of all of this, as Levin pointed out in the last chapert of his book, and as we recommended in the Militia page among others, will take a lot of time. Adding urgency to the need for solutions are the two facts that,
The Marxocrats would have no real problem with becoming satellite puppet dictators over America in the service of Xi Jinping any more than all the dictators of the Warsaw Pact nations minded being in the service of the old Soviet Union. They were still absolute dictators in their respective domains, and the USA would be the biggest domain of all.
What is needed is strong manly leadership that will simply declare that which is unconstitutional to be illegal and nullify it, then and there, and let the opposition to that action scramble to somehow un-nullify it. It has to be done while we are still under our American Constitutional rule, or it cannot be done at all.
In our interview with Cliff Kincaid, linked to at the bottom of the China page, we recommended shutting down the department of education, and Cliff pointed out how Reagan had tried to do that and failed. But the reason Reagan failed is that he tried to do it politically, rather than legally. He couldn't get Congress to do it, because Congress was almost as corrupted then as it is now.
But Reagan could have done it legally, if he had thought of it. He was the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, and, the department of education, like a lot, indeed like most, of America's federal bureaucracies, is an illegal institution in its very being. It is unconstitutional. Education may not be found among the limited and enumerated powers of the Congress to address in law. If the Congress, which has sole authority to legislate new law, cannot address it, it cannot legally exist at the federal level. It is a matter under state, local or citizen jurisdiction, but not federal.
If a strong manly leader, as President, were to simply declare it to be unconstitutional and therefor null, closing it, firing everyone in it, nullifying all of its regulations, and shutting down all retirement and other benefits from current and past employees of it, the opposition would be faced with publicly opposing the clear wording of the very constitution they solemnly swore in their oaths of office to uphold in the very performance of their offices.
The strong manly leader would have the high ground. If the opposition wanted to re-institute their evil education-dominating department of education, they could draw up a Constitutional Amendment and send it out to be ratified by a super majority of 38 states. Then it would be Constitutional.
A strong manly President could do the exact same thing to unconstitutional laws, such as Abortion, Homo-Marriage, etc., and to other unconstitutional federal bureaucracies, such as the EPA, CDC, FDA, HUD, etc., etc., etc.
And he could do the same thing to, guess what, the Political Parties.
The sitting American government is now too corrupted to be able to correct itself in the normal ways. It has just gone too far. It will take a real bull-in-the-china-shop approach by someone who's actions are strictly Constitutional and restorative of the Constitution to do it.
Pray for it to come to be, and support it when it does.
The only thing Truth has going for Him in this world is us.
The restoration of Truth = Reality in the hearts and minds of men is now totally dependent upon you and me; if we don't do it, it won't get done.
Sign the Letter to your Bishop, and make our Church Catholic again.
Join Cardinal Burke's Storm Heaven Rosary Campaign.
Get behind President Trump, and make America Constitutional again.
Pray for a strategic collaboration between Abp. Vigano and Trump.
With fear and trembling, work out your salvation--Phil 2:12
Seek the Truth; Find the Way; Live the Life.
Please God, and Live Forever.
Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation; "hover" the mouse over it just to see the simple interpretation.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
[All Web Pages listed in Site Map by date-of-publication;
oldest at the top, newest at the bottom of the list.]
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter
Date: Thu Aug 05 11:52:28 2021
You shouldn't just lump good people like John McCain and Walter Cronkite into your imaginary menage of anti-Americans and communists. To do so is to begin to lose all credibility.
Date: Fri Aug 06 2021
From: Vic Biorseth
Yes I should. They need to be recognized for what they were. The fact that they were loved and respected by millions does not mean that they were good Americans at all; it only means that they were loved and respected by millions. They were still globalists, which means that they were anti-nationalists, which means that they were anti-Americans, because American happens to be a nation. They were ideologically Communist at the very least, and it just doesn't get any more anti-American than Communist ideology.
We are loaded-down with such respected citizens who are deeply involved in our national destruction. When anti-American terrorists such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and anti-American Communist revolutionaries such as Richard Andrew Cloward and Francis Fox Piven are popular, lauded, celebrated tenured teaching professors in American universities, it's high time someone stood up, pointed at them and shouted "Traitor!"
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
All Published Articles
By Publication Date
Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and
broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in
thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life:
and few there are that find it! Beware of false prophets, who come to you in
the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Jesus Christ; Matt 7:13-15
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston Churchill
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the