Formerly the Thinking Catholic Strategic Center
Vic Biorseth, Tuesday,
February 24, 2015
There is nothing holy about the Koran. It is loaded down with evil, hate and cruelty toward the other, with blind, slavish submission required of the disciple. All under pain of death. Read it yourself and see if you don't come to the same conclusion.
When I wrote War on Islam, external Jihad, regardless of what name it traveled under, was to be separated out for destruction, wherever it reared it's evil head. See the link for the strategic details. Moslems who did not support or participate in Jihad were to be left alone.
My thinking was that the "peaceful Moslem" was the Moslem who did not really know his own faith very well, and did not really practice it or participate in it much or at all. Like the nominal Catholic, or the non-practicing Christian of any variety. The more any Moslem gets into his Koran, the more he will feel the pull to external Jihad, or Holy War against us, the Jews, and everyone.
But that thinking is dangerously flawed, because of the impossibility of discerning between the "ignorant" Moslem who doesn't know his own faith, and the deceptive, treacherous Moslem pretending to be peaceful and friendly to us, just as the Koran instructs him to do.
Islam's Koran demands unlimited and relentless war against us, and all unbelievers. We need to take it at its word and and wage unlimited and relentless war against Islam.
How do we do that, with so many Moslems right here among us? Is it already too late?
In the latest Treason page, we showed how Comrade President Obama, peace be upon him, has demonstrated an affinity with Islam and a related Islamic animosity toward us. He also has demonstrated an affinity with Marxism and a related Marxist animosity toward us. In any direct conflict, he may be expected to take Islams side, and/or Marxism's side, against us.
That is his nature. He has never demonstrated any love for America. Quite the opposite. See the Anti-American President page for a treatment of Ruddy Giuliani's sudden "discovery" that Obama hates America. Better late than never does not apply when it just may be too late.
In the World War III Beginning page we noted a serious fear of Thomas Sowell; he worried that, with Obama's help, a nuclear Iran might ignite a nuclear bomb somewhere in America. And that Obama's immediate response might be to surrender. It fits. Thomas Sowell is no fear monger, and no lightweight among thinkers. In that same page, I worried that Comrade Putin might ignite one somewhere in America, with Comrade Obama's help, and Comrade President Obama's immediate reaction might be to surrender. He can go either way.
Our internal national problem with Islam was originally born of the political correctness movement's blessing of Suicidal Diversity and Multiculturalism in the absolute absence of assimilation into the national culture. Which in turn was born of Marxist Ideology's long march through all American institutions, infecting if not controlling all of them. Academe, education, journalism, entertainment, publishing, political Parties.
Marxist-initiated political correctness dissuades and opposes national assimilation in America. It promotes the opposite. Inner city enclaves of black Americans who refuse to assimilate into despised "white" culture. A criminal alien population actually recruited, drawn and encouraged to come here with no intention whatsoever to eventually assimilate. To always remain separate, and perhaps eventually take over.
Before now, we were a nation of immigrants, but assimilated immigrants, who came here to assimilate, to be part of something wonderful and unique in the world. Not to remain apart. If they loved their land of birth more than America, they would not have come to America. They came to America to become American. So they learned the language, the Constitution, they joined us, they became American, and they became so assimilated as to be indistinguishable.
But, the cancer of Marxist ideology has had it's long march through all of our institutions, leaving behind an army of disciples of the likes of Saul Alinsky, Cloward, Piven, Ayers, Dorhn, etc., to further Divide and Conquer America, from the inside. In our newly taught national sense of Political Correctness we can be seen to be instigating our own demise.
We are asking for it.
We have openly anti-American professors teaching open anti-Americanism in all of our very best American universities. And we know it. And we do not stop it. In fact, we protect it.
Can there be any doubt that we are asking for it?
So now we have Islamic enclaves in America that are not assimilating and will not ever assimilate into the larger culture, which they, for the most part, despise. For the most part, they did not come to America for good and wholesome reasons. For the most part, they did not come here to assimilate and become American, or they would be assimilating. But they are not. They remain rigidly apart. They take over areas, and they seek legal and juridical autonomy; they seek to rule themselves, outside of our law. It doesn't get any more separate than that.
I wrote the Divide and Conquer pages to oppose the anti-American movement efforts to divide us, set us against each other and instill implacable hostility among us. I wrote The Winnowing Pages to warn against the insidious and evil Inclusiveness and Diversity movement. Eventually, I wrote the Social Separation warning and posted it on the Home Page of the whole website, as follows:
I feel like I am shouting into a hurricane. It fills me with despair.
We should be recognizing each Islamic enclave, each little neighborhood Ummah (Islamic Community) for what they are. Each one of them is a little sub-set or "franchise operation" of the larger Global Islamic Ummah, or Caliphate, if you prefer that title. Lots of little mini Caliphates all over the world, all awaiting the opportunity to unite with others, one way or another.
The Ummah, or Community, is one of the three domains Moslems recognize, which we first described in The Islam Way page.
The Ummah is "Dar Al-Islam", or the domain of Submission (or Peace) and the only place where peace reigns, and the only place where Allah is merciful. "Dar Al-Suhl" is the domain of temporary truce, in areas where Moslems are not yet strong enough or populace enough to make open war on the non-believers. "Dar Al-Harb" is the domain of war, where open war is waged to bring unbelievers into total conversion, submission, or death, one way or another. Eventually, the Ummah will encompass the whole of the world.
The whole purpose of Islam is to expand Dar Al-Islam at the expense of Dar Al-Suhl and Dar Al-Harb, until only Dar Al-Islam exists.
Very simple; nothing to it.
Where I think I went wrong in my earlier War on Islam strategy was in the idea of somehow separating out Jihad from Islam, and going after all active Jihadists, and perhaps putting real fear into the hearts of future would-be Jihadists, and leaving larger Islam alone. But the more you read the Koran the more you realize that Jihad cannot be separated out and destroyed. It is just too intertwined. Islam and Jihad are one.
Nor is there is anything radical about terrorism, another integral and inseparable part of Islam.
It's right there in the Koran and it cannot be taken out.
Islam itself is implacably hostile to any other religion and to any other form of legal jurisprudence. That means that Islam is implacably hostile to American herself, and murderously so. I'm sorry, but that's the way it is, and it has to be faced and recognized for what it is.
So what does that mean to all the Moslems living here?
In my opinion, we need to deport them all. They need to be made to leave. If they are really Moslems, then they are really anti-Americans. We have quite enough anti-Americans among us already, and we have no need of more.
I just don't see any other way. I actively seek your input on this. If I am wrong, show me how. I would like to be wrong on this. But I don't see how Jihad can be separated out of it's parent ideology; the Islamic religion, law, war strategy and call to holy war are all one and the same thing. And that makes Islam dangerous to the other, always and everywhere.
If you know something I don't know, let's hear it.
Pray for America in her darkest hour.
Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Wed Feb 25 11:22:48 2015
I have been reading and thinking quite extensively on this subject, just to try and get a better understanding of the subject for myself. The best analogy I can come up with is to compare the faith(not beliefs) of radical Muslims to Catholic Christians, if you will. The "pure" and "orthodox" strain of Islam comes from wahhabism(sp?). Just like Catholic Christians believe they possess the one true faith, these wahhabist Muslims also believe that they practice the one true Islam. Because our Catholic religion was started by God and not man, we are fortunate to have a keeper of the faith until the end of time, which Islam obviously does not possess. So, like modern Christianity/Protestantism these days, Islam appears similar in that they have many "denominations" if you will, that pick and choose what their beliefs are. That is why you have Muslims thinking other Muslims are infidels and killing each other. The huge problem, as I see it, is how do you rid the world of an errant theology that demands submission through violence? The more "westernized" the Muslim is, the less likely they are to adhere to the stricter, orthodox form of Islam, but even the less orthodox still tend to have a problem with leaving their neighbor alone, ie., the Jews. It definitely appears to be the only religion out there these days that tends to revolve around a lot of killing versus ideas, and because of this I'm not sure if its even possible to reform the religion from within. Unfortunately, the strict Wahhabist form of Islam with its Sharia law has been taught in schools and Mosques throughout Saudi Arabia for many, many years and has been exported to many other countries as well. I struggle with a solution, because I don't know how practical it would be to deport all Muslims in a free country like ours, especially when you have many in the US following the more "peaceful" denomination, if you will. However, this tends to be a moot point anyway, when your country can't begin to secure its own borders. If deportation were possible, I'd make sure I found a way to deport all liberals, socialists, and Marxists as well..lol! I wish there was a way to determine what was being taught in the mosques around our own country, because I do believe that we also have quite a few of the "non-peaceful" variety of Muslims already here. I do worry that this form of Islam could easily take root in our country because of the absolute ignorance of many of our fellow citizens, liberal politically correct judges, and the corruptness of politicians. If allowing Sharia law in some areas resulted in votes for the democrats, I'm sure they would be OK with it. It is very disheartening, because we not only have to combat radical Islams hate for our country, we also have to combat all the Marxist hate for our country as founded, as well. It is amazing how similar these ideologies are in suppressing life and liberty. Having Marxism now infested inside one of the last defenses we have here, the Catholic church, I sometimes wonder if prayer is all we have left!
Date: Wed Feb 25 2015
From: Vic Biorseth
There are no Islamic denominations, as such. Unlike our Bible, which has many versions and interpretations, there is only one version of the Koran. The only real difference between Shia and Sunni Moslems involves an ancient argument over the true line of succession of Caliphs from Mohammed, who was the first Caliph.
Wahhabism may be the oldest school of Islam because it may be the original one. Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of Islam, and the home of both Mecca and Medina. Wahhabism is not radical; it is Islam most properly taught.
When Shia sects kill other Shia Moslems, and when Sunni sects kill other Sunni Moslems, and when any Moslems kill any other Moslems, it is usually because of political battles over who is to be recognized as Caliph, whether of the whole movement, or of a particular area. Moslems killing each other is how they do their politics. Every tribal chieftain dreams of one day becoming Caliph, but there can only be one. Serious Jihadists will kill everyone who even slightly opposes their particular Jihad. An analogy might be how Stalin and Hitler, both Marxists and secretly co-conspirators for a time, became mortal enemies, because ultimately there could be only one ruler of the world, not two.
No Islamic Imam, anywhere, would ever renounce external Jihad from the pulpit. That would be apostasy, punishable by death. Jihad is preached in all Mosques, including those in America. The only difference is that some will preach it more fervently than others, and some may try to avoid the subject as much as they can.
See It's the Koran, stupid. It's all right there in the one and only Koran.
Date: Wed Feb 25 12:10:22 2015
From: Dennis Riendeau
Location: Lewiston, Idaho, USA
Vic, once again, you are right on. You have left us with the real question: how is our nation/culture to survive? And, what can we do?
Date: Wed Feb 25 15:44:40 2015
From: Rick Butkowski
Location: Taylor, MI. U.S.A.
I read your article about re-thinking the War on Islam and agree wholeheartedly. Islam has been at war with Christianity, particularly with Roman Catholicism and Byzantine Orthodoxy from its very beginning. Islam has always conducted war against ANY religion which was not Islamic from its very beginning in the mind of the "prophet", when his fevered mind first encountered the angel of light which he identified as Jibril. I've read the Quran three times and have concluded with the idea that it cannot be read only in parts. It must be read in its entirety or it will be wrongly interpreted and misunderstood. The Church needs to read it as well and understand that it is a book that puts forward a plan for total world domination and conquest at the expense of every other religion and/or nation. Sharia (Allah's Law)is structured to defeat all other nations' laws.
Date: Wed Feb 25 2015
From: Vic Biorseth
Dennis, and Rick:
Thank you for the affirmation; at least now I feel not totally alone. Whatever we do, none of us are going anywhere near survival, let alone victory, without a major national recognition of exactly what Islam is.
I tried reading the Koran cover to cover, like a book, and I cannot do it. It is not written like a book. Only parts of it are any kind of a succession of ideas laying out any kind of a story line. Much of it is disconnected sayings after disconnected sayings of Mohammed, with no logical thread that I can discern.
As I understand it, his scribes were not well equipped scribes; they wrote on any scrap of any material that could be written on whenever they heard Mohammed say something they thought was profound. Parchment, if it was available, or leaves, or cloth, or their own hands and arms. When it was all later collected and put into the Koran, that's what resulted.
It almost makes me dizzy, or puts me to sleep. I wind up re-reading a section multiple times, and then giving up on it and moving on, only to have that happen again. And again. There is no real logic to it.
If Mohammed really encountered an angel it was the wrong kind of angel.
Date: Tue Aug 04 05:58:23 2015
You cannot deport or exile or banish people because of their religion. Read the first amendment. Face it. We're stuck with them.
Date: Tue Aug 04 2015
From: Vic Biorseth
If you have a better idea, let's hear it.
At question here is whether the USA has a right, as a soveriegn nation, to continue to exist, and to rule herself under her own Constitution, or not.
The First Amendment was written by Christians for Christians, and for any other religion that did not demand the death of Christianity and the end of all other forms of government. That leaves Islam out. Whether you want to view it as a religion, an ideology or a fraud makes no difference. It drives at world domination, just like Marxism. That makes it an enemy of all other religions, America, national governments, sovereignty itself, and human civilization itself.
Do you have a better idea, or not?
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Get in the fight! Engage the Enemy!
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
All Published Articles
By Publication Date
Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and
broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in
thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life:
and few there are that find it! Beware of false prophets, who come to you in
the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Jesus Christ; Matt 7:13-15
The Purpose of this grouping of links is to organize articles exposing the fraud of Islam as a religion and Mohammed as a prophet.
The Islam Pages
With war declared on the whole non-Islamic world in the year 622 A.D., no one should have been surprised at Osama Bin Laden's declaration of war in 1966. Mohammed himself declared war on us long before we existed as a nation. To find the true source of the "radicalization" of peaceful Moslems into Jihadism, all you have to do is read the Koran. It's all right there, and there is nothing radical about it.
The Islam Pages: Setting the record straight for the non-Islamic world. The Islam Pages describe the war declared upon us all by Mohammed after the Hijrah in 622 AD.
"Civilized" Islamic Nations versus the True Islamic Religion. When Politics drives Religion in Islamic Nations, the whole world is safer; when Religion drives Politics in Islamic Nations, the whole world is menaced.
On the necessity of using Barbarian Allies against the worst Barbarians. Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other Moslem nations so fear ISIS that they will ally with despised America and Israel against it. But never forget that Barbarian Allies are still Barbarians, at the core.
Civilized Moslems: Ataturk's Turkey and the Shah's Iran had them. Once, Civilized Moslems, Educated Women and Peaceful, Attractive, Beautiful Cities predominated in lands where now we see little other than Typical Islamic Barbarity.
The Islamic Connection between ISIS, Random Terrorism and Global Jihad. It is the unseen Islamic Connection that is conquering Western Civilization: The Known Terrorist Groups, Native Born Convert Terrorists, Global Jihadists, etc. are all Moslems who read the same Koran.
The sole path to Islamic Heaven is to die a martyr in performance of Jihad. That's it. Islam assures no one else of salvation. Male martyrs get a permanent erection; female martyrs get a permanently erect penis. No kidding.
The Looming Islamic War: Sunni, ISIS, Shia, Kurds, Russia, Israel, USA? Sunni nations allying with Israel against ISIS? Excuse me? Shia nations allying with Russia? Who's on First here?
The Source of Radical Islamic Terrorism? Mohammed and the Koran. Radical Marxist Terrorism comes out of the Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital. Similarly, Radical Islamic Terrorism comes right straight out of the Koran.
Should we treat Islam differently than other religions? If not, why not? Doesn't Islam treat the whole non-Islamic world differently than it treats Islam?
Refuting Mohammed and his ideology of conquest masquerading as a religion. Here we refute Mohammed, who should be seen as little more than a popular fraud among pagans.
The "Palestinian Problem" is just an Evil Mask; it's really an "Islam Problem". There was no state or nation of Palestine when modern Israel was born. It was Islam, not Palestine, that attacked Israel in 1948.
The Truth about Islam, finally, in a homily at Mass. You never hear the unvarnished truth about Islam, or other evils, from Catholic clerics. Maybe that's finally changing.
American survival itself depends on getting Islam out of America. Cult forms Culture; Islam forcibly attacks all non-Islamic cultures. American national existence depends upon getting Islam out.
Recognizing, at last, the Islamic Declaration of War on Human Civilization. Congress should Recognize the long existing Islamic Declaration of War, and Declare War against ISIS and all other active Islamic Jihad organizations.
The common link between Paris, San Bernardino, 9/11, etc.: Islamic Jihad. It was common, ordinary, every day Jihad. No one was radicalized; nothing was hijacked; no one went berserk.
The argument within Islam, and about Islam, regarding the true nature of Islam. The true nature of Islam: Ron Paul, King Saud, Ali Khamenei, Comrade Obama, all have their versions.
The French Islamophobia: Was it real? Or is Islam really something to be feared? If the French Islamophobia turns out to have been warranted, what about ours?
What would War on Islam look like? Would victory even be possible? With what successful overall strategy could we wage war on an ideology?
Definition of Islam: Ideology of Military Conquest Masquerading as a Religion. The Definition of Islam describes the “Convert, Submit or Die” War Strategy of Mohammed.
The Islam Way Versus The Way of the Lord, and the way of Western Culture. The Islam Way stands at loggerheads with the moral, social and civil codes historically common to Judeo-Christian, Western Civilization.
How Orthodox Mainstream Islam Opposes America, and all other National Existence. Islam's Lesser Jihad seeks to (1) Convert All, or (2) Subjugate All, or (3) Kill All. Islam opposes America and American national existence.
The hard, cold, truth about the murderous nature of the religion of Islam. Islam is a religion of Peace? Excuse me? If that's true, then you must agree that Islam has a very funny way of showing it.
OK, the strictly Koranic Islamic teaching on infidels isn't TOTALLY murderous. A changing view on the Islamic teaching on infidels, and other important issues this political election season.
The Islamic Theocracy menace Vs. the U.S. Constitution First Amendment. How to attack the expanding Islamic Theocracy here while remaining true to the Constitution: SANE may have found the way.
Could we, and should we, outlaw Islamic Sharia in the US? Our Constitution guarantees freedom of religion; but what of a "religious law" legal system that has a core goal of the destruction of our Constitution itself?
Can we outlaw Islam in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Again, it's Israel up against what appears to be the whole pea-picking world. Weak lip-service and pretty speeches aside, America is Israel's only real ally. And, as war is imposed upon her again, even many Americans are lukewarm in their support. Why?
The latest Israeli conflict is little different from all the previous ones. The first Israeli conflict with her neighbors, and every one since then, has been a simple matter of self defense.
Faith And Reason Vs. Islam: A Pontiff on faith and reason again, and again, etc. It is and has always been faith and reason vs. Islam; Islam is unreasonable, it's faith equals submission, and it is by nature violent and war-oriented.I
slam is the enemy; the non-Islamic world just doesn’t know it yet. I keep saying that Islam is the enemy here, and you keep not wanting to hear it. But it's true.
The Ground Zero Mosque. The ground zero mosque is an Islamic slap in the face of all 9/11 victims.
Tolerating intolerance of America is what Americans are being trained to do. In tolerating intolerance of themselves some Americans think they are proving something or other.
More concessions to the Palestinians? Do concessions run on a one way street? Israel is called to make more concessions to the Palestinians. It is never the other way round.
On Evil and Nonsense: Look closely at Nonsense, and find Evil at its root. Evil and Nonsense: deny evil and you deny right vs. wrong; which is to deny common sense, which is to invoke nonsense.
Three fatal oversights of the top conservative cognizanti: Glenn, Rush and Sean. Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity are on the right track, but just nibbling around the edges of who the enemy is.
n support of American Nationalism and American Patriotism. American Nationalism and American Patriotism have been demonized long enough.
Argument opposing Sharia law as brutal, oppressive and murderous. Opposing Sharia Law means opposing brutal domination, wife beating, child abuse and even bloody murder.
Who "radicalized" the Boston Marathon Bomber brothers? It's the Koran, Stupid. Yes, it's the Koran, stupid, and it's mainstream Islam, and there's nothing radical about either of them.
Fair warning: Beware of the Moslem Liars holding olive branches and smiling. If you have Moslem friends, you need to learn about the religious Moslem Liars
War Begets War: It's About Islam; It Always Was. Undoing Islamic Lies of "Peaceful" Moslem Propagandizers.
Rethinking War on Islam: War on "parts" of Islam, or, Unlimited War. Rethinking War on Islam may mean a perpetual state of war, for Islam's evil cannot be separated out.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston Churchill
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the