Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, http://www.CatholicAmericanThinker.com
After we have held a job for awhile, we come to feel that we possess it; that it is ours, and that we have a right to it. This feeling, which is natural and never without merit, can be a source of pride in workmanship and accomplishment, and of a sense of solidarity not only with fellow workers but also with our employer. Like anything else, this sense of job ownership can be over-blown into something negative. And, it is a natural feeling that is always ripe for direct or underhanded Marxist exploitation.
The Catechism (paragraph 2434) addresses the moral responsibility of the employer to provide a just wage to the worker; all around the neighborhood of that paragraph it talks to issues of working, compensation, solidarity and related issues. Workers should have the right to organize, negotiate, strike and so forth. On the other side of that coin, employers have a right to profit; it is what they are in business for. Both worker and employer have a right to their pay. The worker is paid in wages; the entrepreneur is paid in profit. Once the costs of doing business for an enterprise approach the level of reducing profits toward zero, or toward an amount less than received by the typical worker, the incentive and even financial ability to stay in business becomes an issue. The entrepreneur might as well just shut the business down and go get a job.
A major point of consideration involves the purpose of the business enterprise. While providing a decent wage for workers is a purpose for the existence of the business, it, most frequently, is not the purpose for the existence of the business. The business exists to make money. If it cannot make money, it cannot remain in existence. Period.
When both worker and employer have, as a primary goal, the ongoing challenge to continually produce the best and most timely and most price-competitive widget in the open marketplace, and neither seeks unfair advantage over the other, things should go along very well. The fair market determines the wage for the worker and the price for the product. It is when the employer thinks he has a right to higher profit at the expense of a fair wage to someone, or, when the worker thinks he has a right to higher wages at the expense of the business that problems arise. When the situation actually is one of the two described above, a negotiated settlement is always possible between reasonable men.
Unfortunately, all too often it is not just what the two parties think about what is due them; it comes down to what they think they know about it, with great certainty. It is all too easy for greed to cloud the reason of the entrepreneur. It is even easier for provocateurs to unreasonably convince workers that they are being exploited. Human beings being the imperfect creatures that they are, sometimes both problems exist, and both parties plant their feet and refuse to budge, reason has left the scene, and the real fireworks begin. This is the preferred and most advantageous situation for the true revolutionary. The two-fold goal of the Marxist is to gain more regulatory control over the means of production and to facilitate the migration of power from the people to the eventual Leviathan State. In other words, to grow the government.
The beginning-point natural sense that we own our jobs and have a right to employment gives the revolutionary almost a home-field advantage. We need to think about that.
If I have a right to something, then it logically follows that someone has a responsibility to give it to me. If I stand up in a crowded room and say "I have a right to a job", then does someone else in the room have a commensurate responsibility to stand up and give me one? Here, the natural tendency seems less to deny my right to a job and more to assign the responsibility, if not to some existing employer, well, then, perhaps to the state.
Once the notion that I have a right to my job itself takes root, then, do I have a right to perform at or below some level of job performance, and keep my job? If I hold my job merely because someone had a responsibility of giving it to me, then how can it be claimed by anyone that I must perform at some level to earn my pay? My pay is a right, is it not?
It may be argued that, under Socialism, many people will perform their job tasks diligently out of a sense of personal honor or morality, and that may be true. However, many more will, over time, become hangers-on and poor producers, only there to collect their pay, with little interest in the quality or quantity or price-competitiveness of the widget. History shows that this is the path to the end of economic excellence, in products and in services and in ideas. Free market Capitalism wins the economic competition, hands down, every single time. Capitalist nations produce wealth, and Socialist nations consume wealth.
But we are talking about more than the creation of wealth here. Once we adopt the notion that the company or the state owes us a living, we begin to move in the direction of intellectual impoverishment. Larger numbers of people will increasingly behave like sheep, or dependent children, in need of being spoon-fed, led around by the nose and told what to do. And, they will become the most fertile ground from which may spring the fruit of the notion of redistributionism.
Which is the fundamentally immoral idea of taking something from someone, merely because they have it, and giving it to someone else, merely because they do not have it. We need to be clear on this. Before you may redistribute something you must first take it from someone.
By what right?
Charity involves giving, willingly, of your excess to someone in need. Great charity involves giving willingly of more than your excess. Perfect charity involves giving all that you have. Charity is always freely giving; it never involves taking. If a would-be Robin Hood takes from someone to give to someone else, that is not charity; he does not give from his own possession, but from someone else's. Taking from someone else is stealing.
Implicit within the Commandment Thou shalt not steal is the inalienable right to private property: the right of an individual to actually own something. I submit that this is a natural right. From Scripture times to now, large families who stay together have accumulated lands and herds and flocks and great wealth. Weaker or non-existent or broken-up families have not succeeded nearly as well. There is another lesson in that fact, but we will address it another time. Should a large farm or ranch or mill or plant or whatever be nationalized or otherwise taken over by others, merely because it is there?
I submit that a better approach might be to feed and encourage, at all levels, by public and private means, in public and private forums, the moral norms common to Judeo-Christianity. The more that this foundational morality is strengthened, the more charitable will both employers and employees be, the greater will be the provision for social safety nets to help the unfortunate and the disaster-stricken, and the more honorable and less antagonistic will be the relationship between worker and employer. While there is no road to worldly perfection, strong Judeo-Christian morality provides a path to better working and economic relationships, to more open and challenged intellect, to more excellence in product and services, and to more individual and collective wealth.This is an idea that is, of course, at odds with the SLIMC1 , which openly attacks our religious expressions in public, and whose main goal is to eradicate Judeo-Christian moral norms in America along with the honorable historical position of Western Civilization itself. Nevertheless, these are norms and institutions and truths that you and I need to strengthen and reinforce and internalize in every way that we can.
This foundational morality is what can make us a voluntarily good people. We are, for the most part, a good people because we willfully seek to be good, in accordance with our inner guiding moral norms. The sometimes well intentioned but misguided collectivist seeks to somehow make things socially better by forcing the situation from without. The Western Culture ethos seeks to make things socially better from within, by establishing, deep within most of us, those wise restraints that make men free. Morality is best established at the grass-roots level; we will hear and accept the Word better from our Pastors than from any bureaucrat or political leader. Morality cannot be dictated from above.
So, bless the holy name of God, and put a little extra into your job today.
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)
Return to Latest News page
Return to HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Converted Page to SBI! Release 3.0 BB 2.0.
Date: Wed Dec 17 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.
Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
and nothing else.
The Purpose of this grouping of links is to gather all site American political positions and arguments in one place.
Political Ideologies Pages
Laying out the contemporary American political factions and their positions, as compared to the Founding Principles in the Declaration, and the Constituting Principles in the Constitution. America is the first nation in world history designed to be without classes - no nobility, no royalty, no aristocracy - all men stand equal before the law.
Geopolitics, Political Ideologies and the American Political Condition. Examination of American Political Ideologies going into the 2012 Election and beyond.
The contemporary conservative American forum out-classes modern journalism. Wading through the bloggosphere pays off when one finds a really good conservative American forum, blog or website.
Fixed Pegs versus Variable Reality: Salvation versus Doom. Fixed Pegs versus Variable Reality describes the dichotomy between objective truth and human imaginings.
Returning to American Founding Principles offers a return to national salvation. American Founding Principles are reawakened by the mortal threat to the nation posed by Obamunism.
Return to American Constitutional Principles is the path to national salvation. American Constitutional Principles are reawakened by the mortal threat to the nation posed by Obamunism.
American Constitutional Doom: Our own political process is destroying us. American Constitutional Doom made inevitable by parasitic enemies within America.
The Democracy-Open Society problem: Does it spell doom for Democracy? The "Redirection" and the increasingly Open Society born of Democracy. Inevitable chaos?
Warning all bourgeoisie: Obama will destroy the middle class. Take fair warning all bourgeoisie, i.e., members of our vast middle class: the Marxists despise you and intend to conquer you once and for all.
In support of American Nationalism and American Patriotism. American Nationalism and American Patriotism have been demonized long enough.
Are our federal bureaucracies all malignant outgrowths of Marxism? Any extra-Constitutional government agency is likely to be a malignant outgrowth of Marxism.
Three fatal oversights of the top conservative cognizanti: Glenn, Rush and Sean. Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity are on the right track, but just nibbling around the edges of who the enemy is.
It’s Liberty versus Marxism and Islam, which cannot coexist with Liberty. Liberty versus Marxism and Islam: the epic contest of this historic era.
Can we outlaw Islam in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Can we outlaw Marxism in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Our argument supporting the Fair Tax as a sensible and practical Tax Revolution. Fair Tax presents the possibility of a real, popular, voter-supported, tax payer supported, grass-roots supported Revolution in America, and a radical change for the better.
Fasttrack Fairtax: Stop income tax until repeal of Amendment XVI. Fasttrack Fairtax: Legislate to not collect income tax and pass FairTax.
Atheizing America - we sit, seemingly mesmerized, merely watching it happen. Among all Leftist agendas, the atheizing America agenda is the one we seem to notice the least. Like deer in the headlights, we just stand there and watch.
Current American Political Landscape: Our Two Parties and their Positions. The Thinking Catholic looks at Issues and Parties for the Catholic American Thinker.
Against diversity for the sake of diversity. Why do Marxists always seek more? Our argument against diversity for the sake of diversity, which weakens and ultimately replaces ideology and ethos.
Opposing affirmative action / equal opportunity programs as racist. Affirmative action (racial preference) requires racial exclusion, which is, definitively, racism.
Are we really a racist culture, or are our blacks just a bunch of crybabies? If America has produced more black self-made millionaires than any or all other nations, then, how is it that America is seen to be a racist nation?
New "race and racism" thread begun by Stephen from VT. On race and racism: the ever changing definition and generic usage of the word "racism."
Athenaeum courses consistently taught that the early Church condoned slavery. This teaching is clearly false. Yet the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP program, in multiple courses, officially taught that the Church "changed" its teaching on slavery.
Toward a definition of a distinct American People: American National Existence. What makes us a distinct American People? The way we look? Or is it someing inside us, that defines American national existence?
Argument against National Health Care, which is, in fact, Socialized Medicine. National Heath Care equals Socialized Medicine, pure and simple. Medical Practice is beyond the scope of government and not what our government is constituted to do.
It's The American Ideal and our Constitutional Government Vs the Global Village. This election, alone, is unlikely to completely undo America, as a nation; but it may work in that direction. It is of vital importance to you as an American.
Anti-American Politics, pure and simple, describe Democrat Party strategy. Anti-American Politics are practiced by all Leftists. Marxism, at any level, is antithetical to the very idea of America. To be Marxist is to be an anti-American.
Argument Against the Anti-American UN: Why do we support such an antagonist? The staunchly anti-American UN has a major goal involving world governance, and America is in the way of that effort.
My anti anti-American arguments are attacks on falsehoods, in support of truth. American Communists hide their true identity and disguise themselves as anti anti-Communists. Using their playbook, I hereby identify myself as an anti anti-American.
The anti intellectual sentiment: Where does it come from? Marxist Academia and the Anti-Intellectual Sentiment.
Boehner’s Folly: will it doom Constitutional America? House Leadership and Boehner’s Folly purposely fumbled and turned over the ball on the one yard line.
Boycott the airlines until they stop the groping and begin profiling. Boycott the airlines; if you can’t go on a company plane or drive, don’t go at all.
Catastrophic Spending: Change You Can Believe In. The most dangerous Change in all of Obamunism is Catastrophic Spending.
The Global Village concept seeks to replace National Sovereignty by default. Marxian "Global Village-ism" makes major inroads among outlaws, and among elitist intellectuals.
We argue against income minimums and caps, and for a free and private market. Income minimums and caps are Marxism’s “moral” bait to gain popular support for Socialism on the path to typical Marxist absolute dictatorship.
True, the world oil supply is limited; but, so are the stars in the universe. "The world oil supply is cruising toward depletion" is the Chicken-Little call from the Left. But it ain't necessarily so.
Marxists and Moslems: The Last Barbarians. The last barbarians not yet converted or conquered by Western civilization are Marxists and Moslems.
Our argument against fads, fashions, popular trends and herd instinct. If speaking against fads makes me square, un-cool or un-hip, then so be it. All fads are, in microcosm, expressions of rebellion against tradition.
If an American Redirection is underway; we all need to look at it. Reviewing some implications of the newly coined Science / Democracy Obversion theory underlying the new American Redirection.
Refuting Separation of Church and State as a Constitutional Principle. If Separation of Church and State cannot be found in our Constitution, what makes it a Constitutional Principle? Nothing. It is NOT a Constitutional Principle.
Of the four Republican candidates left standing, only Santorum gets it. Romney? No. Gingrich? No. Paul? No. Only Santorum gets it.
Definition of Capitalism: Economic Organization based on Private Property. Any true definition of Capitalism must state that it is purely an Economic system, not a Government system, and it works most efficiently and profitably under Representative Government.
God and Nature: on the Nature of Things, established by the Creator of Things. on man’s Perversion of the Nature of Things, even with the best of intentions.
Going whole-Hog on American Constitutional Restoration. It's all or nothing, now. If we don't go whole-hog on Constitutional Restoration, the USA is history.
Introducing Glenn Beck Progressivism, and the depth of the hidden movement. Glenn Beck Progressivism: the unseen and unrecognized advance of Marxism.
If we have an inherent right to something, then, who must supply it? Rights and Responsibilities exist in paired sets; a right does not exist in the absence of a related responsibility. If indeed we have a right to our job, then, someone must provide it. Who?
The Three Big Ideas competing in global geopolitics today. The Three Big Ideas, and a Fourth one: aggressive, militant atheism, or secularism.
Only clear, distinct political battle lines will save Constitutional America. Fuzzy, indistinct political battle lines only encourage and feed the "bipartisan" progressive destruction of this last bastion of Human Liberty.
Political, Theological and Philosophical Pigeonholes. No one exactly fits any Pigeonhole; you're not supposed to Pigeonhole anyone; but what about their own words, actions and behavior?
Absolute Truth, as The Winning Political Force to be Reckoned With. The 2016 Candidate who stands in Truth rather than whatever various audiences want to hear will beat everyone, severely.
The Social Formula [Culture=Religion+Politics] is Inviolate. Politics merely organize Human Culture around the predominant Religious beliefs of a distinct and identifiable People.
Whether the result means death or rebirth, the American Reset will be painful. America was born in Revolution. If the reset means rebirth, it will only come through re-revolution.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the