Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, http://www.CatholicAmericanThinker.com
This is written in partial response to perceived threat of the Redirection previously discussed in the American Redirection article. This article treats only the SANE-supplied contention regarding the completely Open Society destiny of Democracy; other articles will speak to the denial of Scientism part of it, and other parts.
The contention seems to be that Democracy itself has become fatally flawed by dominant educated thought, which subconsciously gives too much credence to Science and too little to Theology in assigning values to things. Stated as a reciprocal relationship, only science is said to deliver certainty, and non-science can deliver only uncertainty. SANE has pointed out that most moderately educated people have moved into a phase of taking science for granted to the point that material science dominates virtually all human discourse, and is now seen to be the one (or most) required component of doing good human reasoning. This has happened for the simple reason that science - at least at it's most scientific level - works, and can be demonstrated to work.
This rather dangerous way of thinking, which gives every appearance of being prevalent today, was patiently demonstrated to me by the arguments and/or writings of Mr. David Yerushalmi, Mr. Shalom Midbar, Mr. Robert J. Loewenberg and others. As discussed previously, it foretells the end of ethos, the toleration of the intolerable, increasingly open and non-discriminatory society, increasingly unrestrained and “pure” Democracy, and, obviously, the eventual end of social order.
Now, whether this is all perfectly analyzed in all its parts, and perfectly put forth for our digestion by SANE, is of less relevance than the fact that it is a condition that cannot be allowed to stand and grow unopposed. It is far too dangerous for that.
This newly identified (for me) predominant way of thinking has a synergistic relationship with ongoing utopian idealism with roots deep in Marxism. It strengthens the currently popular tendency toward non-discrimination and over-arching tolerance. When you hear a Dennis Kucinich loudly demanding of Conservatives that they ”stop dividing us”, or a Hillary or a Billary charging Republicans with ”practicing the politics of division”, or a Teddy Kennedy promoting ”inclusiveness” and ”tolerance”, you need to pause and consider who they’re talking about, when they use these words. You might logically think that they are talking about Americans, since they are, after all, American politicians. But you’d be wrong.
They’re talking about everyone on Earth. That’s the ultimate Global Village goal. The whole Leftist agenda is geared toward what the Leftist elitism knows, in its self-perceived infinite wisdom, that we all are “naturally” supposed to be moving and evolving toward a perfect, borderless, nation-less, utopian entity, where everyone and everything is treated as equal. That this notion is un-American is clear and obvious on its face. It aims at the dissolution of the United States of America.
That is, I submit, The Unspoken Known of the World Elites. It explains why the French and other Eurabians consider America and Americans to be arrogant. We actually have the unmitigated gall to consider ourselves and our country and our people to be somehow special, and different, and separate from foreign individuals, countries and peoples. They do not. And they see theirs as the superior position. Why, to consider your own people to be in any way special is to discriminate, and to be intolerant, and to be divisive. And, after all, you just can’t make it to utopian perfect equality thataway.
So we see the Leftist Elite class and our highest-ranking Dems promoting the eventual legalization of illegal alien incursions into America, valid drivers licenses for them, voter-registration for them, Social Security for them, educational, medical and other benefits for them, and on, and on, and on. They see no difference between them and us. In the Leftist view, we are all one and the same. We should all be willing to invite a drug lord, or a smuggler, or a bomb-vested Arab, or an official Russian assassin, to tea. Don’t even look at ‘em; just close your eyes and invite ‘em. Otherwise, you’d be discriminating. Can’t have that.
They haven't read Adam Smith's Wealth Of Nations (or they rejected it in favor of Marx's Das Kapital) and they have no recognition or understanding of the original source, the very roots, of wealth, even as they act to destroy them. As they advance their silly pipe-dream and we see borders, sovereignty, order and the USA diminish, so also will wealth diminish. Eventually the Mexicans, Guatemalans, etc., will have no place to go to make money, and they will be able to begin or get on with the process of starvation, along with everyone else. They don't know how to generate new wealth, but only how to consume it.
I see some significant differences in The Problem as manifested in America versus as manifested in Israel. Israel was, from it’s birth, as designated by the UN, to be a Jewish Homeland. That’s what it was originally designed to be, that’s what it was created to be, and since then it has fought and won multiple wars that sought to change that design if not destroy the nation completely, and failed to do so. Israel won, every time, and therefore, Israel is (if and so long as she wishes to be) a Jewish Homeland. A Jewish nation, even considering the wild diversity among Jewish people, is much more of A People as distinguishable from others than America ever was or could ever hope to be.
Unlike Israel, America is said to be a Christian nation based upon demographics alone. We are Christian by overwhelming population count. Our first American colonies had official Protestant denominations (and one Catholic one) established in their law. When we became an independent nation and the Constitution debates were settled at ratification, the First Amendment “Establishment” clause was included in order to prevent a new Federal government from imposing another official state religion over the top of the already legally established official state religions. Over time, it was seen to be better to leave religious choices to individual free souls, and one by one, each state disassembled it’s official legal support for specific religions, and today each state has some clause similar to the United States “Establishment” clause in its Constitution. The “new” problem is not so much that we are no longer a Christian People, but that so very many of us don’t act like it. And many of our Jews don’t act like Jews. Our own worst enemies are not the atheists, but us.
I disagree with the contention seen at SANE that America began a decline from a specific Judeo-Christian People with the freeing of the slaves. From our earliest history, free persons of color were ever increasingly among us, fighting in our wars (on both sides) including our earliest Indian wars and the Revolution. That slavery and later segregation represented an enormous tear in the moral fabric of the American ethos is undeniable; however, that wound is still healing over time. Slavery in America was doomed from the beginning and eventually killed by the slow working of America’s predominant Judeo-Christian ethos. There exists a minority within a minority within a minority among America’s blacks who are hostile to America and determined to not assimilate or participate peacefully in the American process. We have politicians and black “leaders” who have built careers and fortunes and businesses out of portraying America as fundamentally racist, and in keeping her blacks unhappy and seeing themselves as “disenfranchised” second class citizens. You are what your think you are, and so many of them seem determined to remain.
But then, they are a minority of a minority, at least. America has many strong black families, many self-made black millionaires, many children and grand-children of, just for one instance among many, the Tuskegee Airmen. It may not be said, as any sort of blanked statement, that most American black males are gimme-a-break crybabies, hand-out whiners, common criminals, random fornicators and generally irresponsible, unprincipled men, as opposed to good family men. In upper crust Hollywood and show-biz, most likely; in a lot of inner city ghettos, probably; in large city populations: possibly; in the suburbs, where most of us live: not likely; across the board in America – no. All the ones I know work their butts off, raise their kids the best they can and pay their taxes just like everyone else.
Bottom line, most Americans, blacks and American Indians included, are Christians, and it’s been that way for multiple centuries now. So are most American Hispanics. As addressed earlier, that says a lot about the ethos we’re all supposed to be living by, although we don’t do it very well. It needs to be strengthened. The very notion of ethos itself needs to be strengthened.
It’s the difference between us and France.
And it’s the difference between most of us and our own intellectual elites. They have no guiding ethos.
That’s why they can stand there with their bare faces hanging out and accuse Christianity of intolerance because of the ancient Christian doctrine that condemns sodomy as a sin. They cannot even allow us our own faith, and yet they accuse us of intolerance. The ACLU12 will use our own tax dollars against us in our own courts because a Christmas Display might hurt the tender little feelings of some poor atheist, some ethos-challenged “Christian” or some super-sensitive Jew. But billboard, newspaper, magazine, radio and TV advertising of sexual perversion products, porn TV channels, porn movies and such are not seen by the same ACLU12 as in any way intolerant of the sensibilities of the overwhelming majority of Christians in America. Who’s calling whom intolerant here?
The tail is furiously wagging the dog.
The Establishment Clause was not intended to restrict our religion, but to free it. It was intended to restrict our government, not our religion. And now “our” government, driven by the Leftist elites, ever increasingly
and acts in every way it can to weaken and destroy our national Judeo-Christian moral guiding ethos. Which is, as Tocqueville said so long ago, the very source of our national greatness.
Christianity is openly mocked and ridiculed by show-biz on stage and on screen, in art and in print, while the ACLU12 looks on approvingly and the SLIMC1 applauds. As Leftist-Dems increasingly refer to openly religious Christian political candidates as Right Wing Religious Nuts, they gain more following among voters who call themselves Christian. Go figure. (And that ain’t all. I actually know a couple of veterans who voted for Billary “I loathe the military” Clinton.)
So what does this indicate? Possibilities:
The chicken-egg question of which came first between an increasingly poorly educated public guided by piss poor thought, and a public guided by The Redirection is largely irrelevant; it’s clear enough that the two things synergistically feed each other and operate to the detriment of doing good critical thinking.
There can be no good logical or moral argument to support such completely asinine notions as:
In point of fact, each of these notions is demonstrably stupid, to the point of being suicidal. Yet our Leftist Elite Class defends and sponsors them, and even codes them into law. The regularly presented examples would be comical if they weren’t so potentially disastrous.
Among the worst of these is the popular Leftist media treatment of current day Israel. As pointed out elsewhere in this site, Israel is a Jewish state, and it is so, if for no other reason, then for the same reason that Turkey is Turkish, Britain is British, Lakota land was once Lakota land and America is now American, which is to say, by right of conquest. Deal with it. The only people who can’t get over it are those with contempt for the notion of sovereignty and prefer world-wide anarchy, or something worse. (Right of conquest, of course, ignores thousands of years of historical Jewish presence there.) Yet, today, Leftist Dems and Pundits and Anchors will directly or indirectly demonize “Zionism” and unfairly compare Israel to South Africa’s apartheid practices. If you ask three different Jews for a definition of Zionism, you’ll likely get three different definitions. The main point is this: who cares? It’s their country, not ours, and not anybody else’s. The UN established Israel as, guess what, a Jewish Homeland. The fact that the current-day UN, like our current day Leftist Elite Class, is now rabidly anti-Semitic has nothing whatsoever to do with that simple fact.
We have our extreme Leftist, Castro-adoring x-President Jiminy Carter, who wants and has always wanted Israel to seriously “negotiate” for her continued existence with those who are obstinately and eternally committed to bringing about her abrupt end. And now, we have the Baker-Hamilton “Iraq Study” report, with it’s recommendation of Israel granting a “right of return” to those Palestinians most committed to the destruction of Israel. The term Palestinian used here refers to Palestinians who are not Jews and not Christians. Specifically, they are exclusively Moslems, raised on hatred of Israel and Jews, and taught from childhood to despise America. Which makes them comrades of our own Leftist Elite Class, at least at the moment. (Our Left hates America too; they hate the original and weakly enduring American Ideal, they hate the American Judeo-Christian guiding ethos, and they hate the notion of a unique American People.) At any rate, Israel is supposed to negotiate.
Negotiation means using reason and compromise to resolve a difference. Successful negotiation results in a satisfactory compromise for both parties. So, how, exactly, do you negotiate with someone whose negotiating beginning point involves a solemnly sworn and irrevocable commitment to causing your death? What might the ultimate compromise look like?
Well, I suppose you could start out by offering to have maybe just some of your fingers or toes cut off, but to be allowed to remain alive. You could work up to maybe losing your legs, or your arms, or maybe an arm and a leg, or your eyes, but still remaining alive. You could, if you were really, really dumb.
Some things are just not negotiable. If you ask one of these Palestinians if an innocent Jew living in present day Israel has any right to continue to live, the answer will be an immediate no. If you ask any of his political leaders if the current sovereign nation of Israel has any right to continue to exist, the answer will be an immediate no. News Flash for Lefties: Israel is not the bad guy here. As pointed out in the Islam and the Jews page, you don’t have to take my word for it, or anyone else’s. Look at what Islam says about Islam, and what it orders it’s adherents to do. To say that Islam is an inherently violent religion would have to be among the grandest understatements of the last fourteen hundred years.
Negotiating with a devout Moslem regarding personal continuation of your own life should be quite similar to negotiating with a rabid pit bull terrier. Well, a rabid pit bull might be a bit more reasonable. If you absolutely must negotiate with a rabid pit bull, I would suggest that the negotiations might generally go along smoother with the pit bull on one side, and you on the other, of a fairly substantial closed and locked door. No matter what he or anyone else says, the minute you open that door and let him into your house, with your children, the negotiations will end, one way or another.
There I go again, stereotyping. And I fully intend to keep right on doing it. If a critter looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, and is constantly seen in the company of other ducks, then I am going to assume that the critter actually is a duck. Get over it. If a culture raises its children on hatred and teaches them to despise America as The Great Satan then I am going to consider that culture to be openly hostile. If leaders of movements publicly declare their intention of harming America, Americans and American allies, I am going to consider those movements to be openly hostile. If they publicly declare war on America, as Al Queda, Hezbollah and others have done, I will consider them to be enemies in a time of war. And if a religion officially orders it’s disciples to kill or harm in any way any non-disciples of that religion, then I will not trust any disciple of that religion, nor will I turn my back on any of them, take my suspicious eyes off of them, or treat them as anything other than sneaky, deceitful, treacherous and quite dangerous aliens.
But our Leftist Elites, with the Democratic Party in the lead, insist upon not stereotyping for security reasons at airports and other places that are proven convenient opportunities for sneaky Moslem mass-murderers to kill us. What can I say? Sometimes stupidity actually hits the suicidal level. All Moslems are not terrorists, they shout; and I suppose that’s true enough. But in this war on terror all the terrorists are most certainly Moslems. No exceptions. They bear constant watching. In my opinion, we would all be better off if they were all made to leave us, and barred from entry. Granting that that ain’t gonna happen any time soon, they still need to be under surveillance as a potential fifth column in our midst that is potentially even more deceitful, treacherous and dangerous than our own SLIMC1 has historically proved itself to be. (See the Vietnam War page.)
So here we are. The Redirection theoretically leads us into an increasingly Open Society in which everything is tolerated, everyone is included, our Republic turns into a pure Democracy, which turns into, essentially, non-people-hood, everybody’s the same, mob rule, which inevitably ends in utter chaos, unless someone ruthless enough seizes power and rules the world. Utopian pipe-dreamers are silly twits not smart enough to see where this is all headed, as they prod it along. I still cannot accept the SANE – sponsored Null Vote Initiative, in which initiates refuse to participate in the “inevitable” catastrophe the Democracy/Open Society moves us toward, under impetus of the Redirection. Which means, not voting. First, my mission statement calls for proactively protecting our national existence and strengthening Western Culture. Second, I don’t (I cannot) believe the current Open Society spiral represents an inevitable and irreversible movement. Third, I don’t see how refusing to vote and encouraging others to not vote will help keep America in existence or help to achieve any of the goals of my mission statement. If the goal is to return America to her original ideals, not voting can never hope to accomplish that.
So, I hope to publicize as much of this as I can, get people thinking about it, and do what little I can to reverse the trend. And that includes voting in elections, along with shouting from rooftops. It is not impossible for some force(s) to wrest main control of the direction of all public dialogue from the hostile hands of the SLIMC1 and point it in a more positive direction, involving unvarnished, uncolored Truth.
The world is constantly changing. Scientific knowledge, technological advances, inventions, discoveries, styles, fashions, ideologies, languages, cultures – all are always in a state of flux and never still for very long. Man needs one sure peg, fixed forever, that does not move. I submit that there is one and only one unchanging force in existence, and that one unchanging force is God. The contention before us involves the contest between the ever changing, ever moving and ever exciting World, increasingly demanding man’s undivided attention, versus the fixed and unchanging Revelation-based ethos, everlastingly encouraging man to guide his life by the Law of God, no matter what the world says. There is one and only one sure peg on which man can hang his ethos – a People’s collective conscience - in order to keep it from changing, too.
Recently, when the Holy Father was in Turkey and some Imams publicly called for his death, a terse response issued from the Vatican publicly pointed out the fact that no religion has any right to call for violence in the name of God. “Violence in the name of God,” you will note, is precisely and exactly what Islam calls for. The Holy Father went on with his quiet visit. He didn’t say these words, a Vatican communication did, in his name. The response from the Imams was silence. Maybe they didn’t want to prove his point; maybe they couldn’t think of a response. But it is my fervent prayer that a whole lot of Moslems read those words and devoted some thought to them.
That Islam is a false religion is quite clear, if for no other reason than that it changed (or sought to change) the unchangeable: Revelation: what was revealed by God to man.
Every word of the Old Testament has been preserved with great care by the Jews for thousands of years. The whole of the Old Testament, as recorded in the Hellenistic-Jewish Septuagint, along with every word of what was to become the New Testament, has been preserved with great care by the Roman Catholic Church for two thousand years. The only unresolved question between the Jews and the Christians involves Who the historical figure Jesus Christ was. To Christians, He was (and is) God; Son of God; Messiah; Second Person of the Trinity. To Jews, He was either a fraud, or a nut, who though He was God. The history of the events surrounding His life are agreed to by both Christians and Jews, except for whether He was Who He said He was.
Along comes Islam, confiscating both the Old and New Testaments for itself, but claiming new teachings regarding Jesus Christ. Islam says He was a prophet. Jesus said He was God. Only one of these contentions is correct. He never said He was a prophet; Christianity never said He was a prophet; Judaism never declared Him to be a prophet. This is a new teaching regarding Jesus Christ.
The Christian Credo, developed long before Islam ever existed, fixed forever, unchanging for all time, declares Him to be Son of God, True God of True God, One in Being with the Father, Conceived by the Holy Ghost, Born of a Virgin Birth, Crucified under Pontius Pilate, Descended to the Dead, Resurrected from the Dead, Ascended into Heaven, Seated at the Right Hand of the Father. Islam proclaims not a single one of these elements of ancient Christian Creed, yet it dares to pretend to teach something new about the nature of Jesus Christ. And to establish a name to be revered over His.
If you are a Moslem and you are reading these words, now hear this: you have been sold a bill of goods, my friend. The whole teaching of Islam is false. There are only Two, not three, included in the exclusive club of the Peoples Of The Book, and they are the Jews, and the Christians. The Revelation is Real. You need to study it. Your immortal soul depends upon it. You need to come to Truth by yourself, on your own, and not by anyone else’s choice for you.
Not by blind submission, but by applying critical thinking, and paying attention to objective truth, and by a free will decision.
Pray. Read. Think. And then pray again. Re-read. Re-think. Get into it.
If you are an American Citizen and you are reading these words, and your high ideals have moved you to the so-called non-discriminatory, inclusive, open-borders, welcoming, peace at all costs side of the current debate, you need to consider this: You have invited some strangers to come in and sit at your dining room table. You need to take a good, close, hard look at all of your invitees. Don’t ask me about them; let them describe themselves and their ambitions to you. You would be well advised to do this before you open the door.
Hillary and Billary during their happy radical college formative Years
Hanoi Jane and her Communist Comrades
John Kerry's pro-Communist, anti-American, treacherous attack on America and on all American service men. Note the upside-down flag, in an inflammatory and insulting parody of the famous Iwo Jima Memorial.
(This book was published, but then all sold and un-sold copies were bought up by him to censor and hide his real pro-Communist, anti-American sentiments, just before his unsuccessful run for the Presidency.)
Bottom line, none of the Criminal Aliens (Illegal Aliens; Illegal Immigrants; Undocumented Immigrants; Undocumented Workers; Whatever) are ever going to vote Republican. None of them are here to assimilate, or to join us, or to become Americans. They are here for a mixture of the following reasons:
If they were here to immigrate, they would have filled out immigration papers. If they were here really to immigrate, and assimilate, and join us, they would have come here legally. Millions have, and millions still do.
Whoever you are, I wish for you the best thing one man can wish for another: that you might find the way to please God, and that you might thereby live forever.
Return to Latest page
Return to HOME PAGE
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" the mouse over a link, without clicking, to just to see the related Acronym appear.)
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Date: Sun Sep 12 20:01:58 2010
Thank you for this – especially the pictures – it is a real eye opener. I never knew the other side was so full of hate and so evil.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Converted Page to SBI! Release 3.0 BB 2.0.
Date: Wed Nov 05 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic Center to
Catholic American Thinker.
Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .
Language and Tone Statement
Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our
standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is.
If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elite Culturally Marxist Authoritarians will never tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their own pro-Marxist/anti-Christian/anti-American/Globalist/anti-Nation/immoral/anti-white/racist and bigoted point of view.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
Your email is perfectly secure here. We use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
The Purpose of this grouping of links is to gather all site American political positions and arguments in one place.
Political Ideologies Pages
Laying out the contemporary American political factions and their positions, as compared to the Founding Principles in the Declaration, and the Constituting Principles in the Constitution. America is the first nation in world history designed to be without classes - no nobility, no royalty, no aristocracy - all men stand equal before the law.
Geopolitics, Political Ideologies and the American Political Condition. Examination of American Political Ideologies going into the 2012 Election and beyond.
The contemporary conservative American forum out-classes modern journalism. Wading through the bloggosphere pays off when one finds a really good conservative American forum, blog or website.
Fixed Pegs versus Variable Reality: Salvation versus Doom. Fixed Pegs versus Variable Reality describes the dichotomy between objective truth and human imaginings.
Returning to American Founding Principles offers a return to national salvation. American Founding Principles are reawakened by the mortal threat to the nation posed by Obamunism.
Return to American Constitutional Principles is the path to national salvation. American Constitutional Principles are reawakened by the mortal threat to the nation posed by Obamunism.
American Constitutional Doom: Our own political process is destroying us. American Constitutional Doom made inevitable by parasitic enemies within America.
The Democracy-Open Society problem: Does it spell doom for Democracy? The "Redirection" and the increasingly Open Society born of Democracy. Inevitable chaos?
Warning all bourgeoisie: Obama will destroy the middle class. Take fair warning all bourgeoisie, i.e., members of our vast middle class: the Marxists despise you and intend to conquer you once and for all.
In support of American Nationalism and American Patriotism. American Nationalism and American Patriotism have been demonized long enough.
Are our federal bureaucracies all malignant outgrowths of Marxism? Any extra-Constitutional government agency is likely to be a malignant outgrowth of Marxism.
Three fatal oversights of the top conservative cognizanti: Glenn, Rush and Sean. Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity are on the right track, but just nibbling around the edges of who the enemy is.
It’s Liberty versus Marxism and Islam, which cannot coexist with Liberty. Liberty versus Marxism and Islam: the epic contest of this historic era.
Can we outlaw Islam in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Can we outlaw Marxism in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Our argument supporting the Fair Tax as a sensible and practical Tax Revolution. Fair Tax presents the possibility of a real, popular, voter-supported, tax payer supported, grass-roots supported Revolution in America, and a radical change for the better.
Fasttrack Fairtax: Stop income tax until repeal of Amendment XVI. Fasttrack Fairtax: Legislate to not collect income tax and pass FairTax.
Atheizing America - we sit, seemingly mesmerized, merely watching it happen. Among all Leftist agendas, the atheizing America agenda is the one we seem to notice the least. Like deer in the headlights, we just stand there and watch.
Current American Political Landscape: Our Two Parties and their Positions. The Thinking Catholic looks at Issues and Parties for the Catholic American Thinker.
Against diversity for the sake of diversity. Why do Marxists always seek more? Our argument against diversity for the sake of diversity, which weakens and ultimately replaces ideology and ethos.
Opposing affirmative action / equal opportunity programs as racist. Affirmative action (racial preference) requires racial exclusion, which is, definitively, racism.
Are we really a racist culture, or are our blacks just a bunch of crybabies? If America has produced more black self-made millionaires than any or all other nations, then, how is it that America is seen to be a racist nation?
New "race and racism" thread begun by Stephen from VT. On race and racism: the ever changing definition and generic usage of the word "racism."
Athenaeum courses consistently taught that the early Church condoned slavery. This teaching is clearly false. Yet the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP program, in multiple courses, officially taught that the Church "changed" its teaching on slavery.
Toward a definition of a distinct American People: American National Existence. What makes us a distinct American People? The way we look? Or is it someing inside us, that defines American national existence?
Argument against National Health Care, which is, in fact, Socialized Medicine. National Heath Care equals Socialized Medicine, pure and simple. Medical Practice is beyond the scope of government and not what our government is constituted to do.
It's The American Ideal and our Constitutional Government Vs the Global Village. This election, alone, is unlikely to completely undo America, as a nation; but it may work in that direction. It is of vital importance to you as an American.
Anti-American Politics, pure and simple, describe Democrat Party strategy. Anti-American Politics are practiced by all Leftists. Marxism, at any level, is antithetical to the very idea of America. To be Marxist is to be an anti-American.
Argument Against the Anti-American UN: Why do we support such an antagonist? The staunchly anti-American UN has a major goal involving world governance, and America is in the way of that effort.
My anti anti-American arguments are attacks on falsehoods, in support of truth. American Communists hide their true identity and disguise themselves as anti anti-Communists. Using their playbook, I hereby identify myself as an anti anti-American.
The anti intellectual sentiment: Where does it come from? Marxist Academia and the Anti-Intellectual Sentiment.
Boehner’s Folly: will it doom Constitutional America? House Leadership and Boehner’s Folly purposely fumbled and turned over the ball on the one yard line.
Boycott the airlines until they stop the groping and begin profiling. Boycott the airlines; if you can’t go on a company plane or drive, don’t go at all.
Catastrophic Spending: Change You Can Believe In. The most dangerous Change in all of Obamunism is Catastrophic Spending.
The Global Village concept seeks to replace National Sovereignty by default. Marxian "Global Village-ism" makes major inroads among outlaws, and among elitist intellectuals.
We argue against income minimums and caps, and for a free and private market. Income minimums and caps are Marxism’s “moral” bait to gain popular support for Socialism on the path to typical Marxist absolute dictatorship.
True, the world oil supply is limited; but, so are the stars in the universe. "The world oil supply is cruising toward depletion" is the Chicken-Little call from the Left. But it ain't necessarily so.
Marxists and Moslems: The Last Barbarians. The last barbarians not yet converted or conquered by Western civilization are Marxists and Moslems.
Our argument against fads, fashions, popular trends and herd instinct. If speaking against fads makes me square, un-cool or un-hip, then so be it. All fads are, in microcosm, expressions of rebellion against tradition.
If an American Redirection is underway; we all need to look at it. Reviewing some implications of the newly coined Science / Democracy Obversion theory underlying the new American Redirection.
Refuting Separation of Church and State as a Constitutional Principle. If Separation of Church and State cannot be found in our Constitution, what makes it a Constitutional Principle? Nothing. It is NOT a Constitutional Principle.
Of the four Republican candidates left standing, only Santorum gets it. Romney? No. Gingrich? No. Paul? No. Only Santorum gets it.
Definition of Capitalism: Economic Organization based on Private Property. Any true definition of Capitalism must state that it is purely an Economic system, not a Government system, and it works most efficiently and profitably under Representative Government.
God and Nature: on the Nature of Things, established by the Creator of Things. on man’s Perversion of the Nature of Things, even with the best of intentions.
Going whole-Hog on American Constitutional Restoration. It's all or nothing, now. If we don't go whole-hog on Constitutional Restoration, the USA is history.
Introducing Glenn Beck Progressivism, and the depth of the hidden movement. Glenn Beck Progressivism: the unseen and unrecognized advance of Marxism.
If we have an inherent right to something, then, who must supply it? Rights and Responsibilities exist in paired sets; a right does not exist in the absence of a related responsibility. If indeed we have a right to our job, then, someone must provide it. Who?
The Three Big Ideas competing in global geopolitics today. The Three Big Ideas, and a Fourth one: aggressive, militant atheism, or secularism.
Only clear, distinct political battle lines will save Constitutional America. Fuzzy, indistinct political battle lines only encourage and feed the "bipartisan" progressive destruction of this last bastion of Human Liberty.
Political, Theological and Philosophical Pigeonholes. No one exactly fits any Pigeonhole; you're not supposed to Pigeonhole anyone; but what about their own words, actions and behavior?
Absolute Truth, as The Winning Political Force to be Reckoned With. The 2016 Candidate who stands in Truth rather than whatever various audiences want to hear will beat everyone, severely.
The Social Formula [Culture=Religion+Politics] is Inviolate. Politics merely organize Human Culture around the predominant Religious beliefs of a distinct and identifiable People.
Whether the result means death or rebirth, the American Reset will be painful. America was born in Revolution. If the reset means rebirth, it will only come through re-revolution.
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the