Download a Permanent Printable PDF Version of This Article.
Vic Biorseth, Monday,
February 16, 2015
This is all pretty old stuff; ground we have covered before. What got me thinking about all this again was some commentary by Rush Limbaugh about the phoniness of all the militant "movements" afoot these days pretending to be making the world a better place. But they have ulterior motives. The common ancestry of most if not all of them might be found in Marx's invention of the Bourgeois and the Proletariat "classes", which needed to exist in the minds of men before class war could be initiated to destroy the status quo.
What got me thinking about it again was Rush's newly articulated aversion to the commonly used term "Workers" when the term "Employees" might be more appropriate. He's right. Proletarians translates to Workers, and carries with it the notion of a rigid "class" of people stuck in that class. But that's not what we are, or that's not what they are. Employees are free to leave employment, seek other employment in a competitive employee-market, start their own business, or just make their own way in the world, by whatever legal means available.
And the phoniness of the militant movements and demonstrations for this or that all have a common feel to them, and it's all wrapped up in the ulterior motive of anti-Capitalist action.
The open demonstrations and social media attacks on McDonald's, for instance, supposedly done in the name of promoting healthy eating and eliminating "dangerous" fat, butter, salt, etc., and even eliminating meat, especially red meat, are clearly phony. Led or inspired by such public personages as Comrade Madam Obama, peace be upon her, neither she, nor any of the demonstrators, nor any of the social media attackers, nor anyone filing or threatening any lawsuits or legal actions, are even customers of McDonald's. They won't eat at McDonald's, ever, under any circumstances, nor will they ever say a kind word about McDonald's. Because their real goal to to put McDonald's out of business, and they have no real interest in quality of food.
All McDonald's can ever do by trying to satisfy or mollify these organized detractors by complying with demands to modify their menu is lose their real customers, lose market share and eventually go out of business.
It's the same with the attacks on Wall-mart. The attackers are not and will never be customers of Wall-mart, nor are they employees of Wall-mart, nor do they ever intend to work for or have anything to do with Wall-mart, other than to bring Wall-mart down.
All Wall-mart can ever do by trying to satisfy or mollify these organized detractors by complying with demands to modify their prices or their wage structure is lose their real customers, lose market share and eventually go out of business.
Do you really think the Race Brothers (Sharpton; Jackson) and their bullhorns and rent-a-mobs will ever be fully satisfied with legal radicalized pro-minority favoritism, unnecessary costly public programs, public apologies, "settlements" involving donations to their personal "foundations" or the false branding of whole police departments as racist? Of course not. That's how they make their lucrative living. They will never be satisfied. Not ever. No matter what.
Can you say "Global Warming Hoax"?
Can you say, "Global Depression caused by Capitalist Failure"?
It's all the same. None of it is what it appears to be. It's all a lie.
Way back in 2012, before the elections, we published the Competing Political Ideologies page, trying to highlight the major bones of contention going into the elections. One of the reader comments sparked a reply describing the Three Big Ideas in geopolitical contention at the time. Let me quote them here:
There is, of course, a fourth major idea, infecting all of the others, but also deserving of attention just on it's own. And that is Secularism, as a militant movement. Militant Atheism, in other words. In America, men are perfectly free to be atheists; that's not a problem.
The real problem arises for America when atheism gets organized into a movement, and seeks to impose its will on the rest of the nation, or any part of it. Whether this is done through unconstitutional civil lawsuits, unconstitutionally legislated criminal law, unconstitutional regulation, or unconstitutional adjudicated legal precedent, it still remains unconstitutional.
Citizens, corporate entities, organizations, whether private or public, and/or government agencies and jurisdictions, cannot constitutionally be forced to be, pretend to be or act as if they were atheist. That's as much a violation of the First Amendment as would be forcing everyone to be Protestant or Catholic. But nobody seems to see that. Atheism is a religious belief system, like any other. It believes, by faith alone, in the absolute absence of any material proof, that God does not exist. It is thus a strictly faith-based religious belief system.
Which is fine, so long as it doesn't interfere with or impose itself on any other citizen's faith-based religious belief system. But it does interfere with and impose itself on other citizen's faith-based religious belief systems. All the time. In this overwhelmingly Christian nation, the organized secularists attack every public display of any Christian symbol, any public Christian message or display, even the public use of words like "Christmas" at Christmas time.
They do precisely what they falsely accuse Christianity of doing.
So Rush spoke about the more Marxified term "workers" universally used to describe employees, and alluded to the fact that the term came into use by organized labor unions. And organized labor unions themselves were born of "Workers of the world Unite!" closing lines of Marx's Communist Manifesto in 1848. And he spoke about the phony attacks on successful Capitalist enterprises in the pretense of seeking the betterment of society or humanity or the environment, or whatever. But he wasn't finished stirring thought.
His commentary then went on to articulate something I think most of us knew, but never quite put into words, at least not as well. And this was his little dissertation on the difference between rights, and laws. The rights, spoken of in the Declaration of Independence, come out of Natural Law, written on the hearts of men by God. Equality. Life. Liberty. Private Property.
These are rights all men naturally know they have; no one has to tell them. It's why all those Iraqi citizens, liberated by President Bush, were so proud to hold up their purple fingers to show they had voted in an election, for the first time, ever. Moslems. All human hearts naturally yearn for Liberty. No matter how they are raised, no matter what their culture says, they yearn to be free, to make their own important life decisions, and to not be subject or slave to any person, ideology, religion, state or master of any kind. To make their own way. For better or worse, to make their own important decisions.
Governments don't make those rights; God does. Constitutional America is the first and only nation on earth to officially recognize that fact, and to protect those citizen rights, even against the government itself. That's why and how the Constitution was designed, written, agreed to and established.
What the anti-Capitalists have done and are doing is confusing rights with laws. They misinterpret our founding and constituting documents to pretend that rights are granted by government, and can be modified or even taken away by government, and then they mix-and-match rights with laws, to redesign culture in another image.
In this new vision, rights to things such as work, a job, food, health care, a certain specified pay, a house or shelter of some kind, all "things", i.e., material objects or consumable products or services. But the "natural" rights, God given, written on our hearts, are immaterial. You are born with them. Equality. Life. Liberty. Pursuit of Happiness. These are not "things" to be bargained for.
You are not born with food, or with a job. You are supposed to go get these things. Feeding yourself is your responsibility, not the responsibility of everyone else. You are not born with physical property of any kind, or with health care, or insurance, or a car, or any tangible thing, or the service of anyone else. If government makes these things legal citizen rights, they will not really be rights, but mere laws of man. And if government declares that you have a right to a job, or to medical care, or to food, or to any specified income, well then - who, exactly, is to supply them for you? The government? Where will the government get them? Out of thin air?
You have no right to material things and government cannot change that fact without enslaving someone.
Yet our Marxified intelligentsia keeps insisting on the forced achievement equality of everything material upon all of us. But not them. The Marxified intelligentsia are to become the new ruling class, aloof and insulated from all of this, who, out of the superior kindness of their hearts, must forcefully impose equality of stuff on all the rest of us, for our own good. It's a tough job, but somebody has to do it.
Because, you see, equality of stuff is not the natural order of things.
Equality of income, wealth, property, etc., must be forced.
And we, the new ruled class, are too stupid to take care of ourselves.
So those are the thoughts stirred to life by another brilliant Rush commentary. I'm telling you, if you're not listening to Rush Limbaugh, you need to start listening. His command of our language and his piercing insight into what he calls Liberalism, which I call Marxified or Anti-Capitalist thought, and his unique ability to articulate these things in an understandable way are a blessing to all who love freedom and America. Especially in these days of the rise of Marxism and the rise of Islam.
So, which of these three Big Ideas might be most compatible with America's original and weakly enduring Judeo-Christian-Religious-Morality and with the Catholic Church, and which might be the least compatible? It is important to note two things about our original Colonial government established official religions of state.
The fact that the individual states over time voluntarily eliminated their original state sponsorship of Christian religions did not mean that they opened the doors to "anything goes" religion, or to anti-Christian religion, or to suppression of Christian religion, or anything of the kind. It simply meant that the state had no official declared state religion. It was assumed that the citizenry were all some variety of Christian, and that the moral code, underlying legislation, execution and adjudication of civil law, remained Judeo-Christian. That's how America tells right from wrong.
How does all of this jibe with the sacred wind of Christian religion?
Compare the Big American Idea to Godless and ungodly Marxism. Compare it to enslaving, dismembering, crucifying and murdering Islam. And then explain to me how any Catholic theologian, any Catholic moralist, any Catholic cleric of any rank, could ever come to favor in any way any of the ideas, ideals or goals of either Marxism or Islam. Or secularism.
Smart-Assed Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devises that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Respond to This Article Below The Last Comment
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Catholic American Thinker
Free E-zine Subscription
You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you the
Catholic American Thinker
and nothing else.
The Purpose of this grouping of links is to gather all site American political positions and arguments in one place.
Political Ideologies Pages
Laying out the contemporary American political factions and their positions, as compared to the Founding Principles in the Declaration, and the Constituting Principles in the Constitution. America is the first nation in world history designed to be without classes - no nobility, no royalty, no aristocracy - all men stand equal before the law.
Geopolitics, Political Ideologies and the American Political Condition. Examination of American Political Ideologies going into the 2012 Election and beyond.
The contemporary conservative American forum out-classes modern journalism. Wading through the bloggosphere pays off when one finds a really good conservative American forum, blog or website.
Fixed Pegs versus Variable Reality: Salvation versus Doom. Fixed Pegs versus Variable Reality describes the dichotomy between objective truth and human imaginings.
Returning to American Founding Principles offers a return to national salvation. American Founding Principles are reawakened by the mortal threat to the nation posed by Obamunism.
Return to American Constitutional Principles is the path to national salvation. American Constitutional Principles are reawakened by the mortal threat to the nation posed by Obamunism.
American Constitutional Doom: Our own political process is destroying us. American Constitutional Doom made inevitable by parasitic enemies within America.
The Democracy-Open Society problem: Does it spell doom for Democracy? The "Redirection" and the increasingly Open Society born of Democracy. Inevitable chaos?
Warning all bourgeoisie: Obama will destroy the middle class. Take fair warning all bourgeoisie, i.e., members of our vast middle class: the Marxists despise you and intend to conquer you once and for all.
In support of American Nationalism and American Patriotism. American Nationalism and American Patriotism have been demonized long enough.
Are our federal bureaucracies all malignant outgrowths of Marxism? Any extra-Constitutional government agency is likely to be a malignant outgrowth of Marxism.
Three fatal oversights of the top conservative cognizanti: Glenn, Rush and Sean. Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity are on the right track, but just nibbling around the edges of who the enemy is.
It’s Liberty versus Marxism and Islam, which cannot coexist with Liberty. Liberty versus Marxism and Islam: the epic contest of this historic era.
Can we outlaw Islam in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Can we outlaw Marxism in the USA and still be a free thinking society? I say we can and should outlaw any ideology that seeks the elimination of Constitutional America.
Our argument supporting the Fair Tax as a sensible and practical Tax Revolution. Fair Tax presents the possibility of a real, popular, voter-supported, tax payer supported, grass-roots supported Revolution in America, and a radical change for the better.
Fasttrack Fairtax: Stop income tax until repeal of Amendment XVI. Fasttrack Fairtax: Legislate to not collect income tax and pass FairTax.
Atheizing America - we sit, seemingly mesmerized, merely watching it happen. Among all Leftist agendas, the atheizing America agenda is the one we seem to notice the least. Like deer in the headlights, we just stand there and watch.
Current American Political Landscape: Our Two Parties and their Positions. The Thinking Catholic looks at Issues and Parties for the Catholic American Thinker.
Against diversity for the sake of diversity. Why do Marxists always seek more? Our argument against diversity for the sake of diversity, which weakens and ultimately replaces ideology and ethos.
Opposing affirmative action / equal opportunity programs as racist. Affirmative action (racial preference) requires racial exclusion, which is, definitively, racism.
Are we really a racist culture, or are our blacks just a bunch of crybabies? If America has produced more black self-made millionaires than any or all other nations, then, how is it that America is seen to be a racist nation?
New "race and racism" thread begun by Stephen from VT. On race and racism: the ever changing definition and generic usage of the word "racism."
Athenaeum courses consistently taught that the early Church condoned slavery. This teaching is clearly false. Yet the Athenaeum of Ohio LPMP program, in multiple courses, officially taught that the Church "changed" its teaching on slavery.
Toward a definition of a distinct American People: American National Existence. What makes us a distinct American People? The way we look? Or is it someing inside us, that defines American national existence?
Argument against National Health Care, which is, in fact, Socialized Medicine. National Heath Care equals Socialized Medicine, pure and simple. Medical Practice is beyond the scope of government and not what our government is constituted to do.
It's The American Ideal and our Constitutional Government Vs the Global Village. This election, alone, is unlikely to completely undo America, as a nation; but it may work in that direction. It is of vital importance to you as an American.
Anti-American Politics, pure and simple, describe Democrat Party strategy. Anti-American Politics are practiced by all Leftists. Marxism, at any level, is antithetical to the very idea of America. To be Marxist is to be an anti-American.
Argument Against the Anti-American UN: Why do we support such an antagonist? The staunchly anti-American UN has a major goal involving world governance, and America is in the way of that effort.
My anti anti-American arguments are attacks on falsehoods, in support of truth. American Communists hide their true identity and disguise themselves as anti anti-Communists. Using their playbook, I hereby identify myself as an anti anti-American.
The anti intellectual sentiment: Where does it come from? Marxist Academia and the Anti-Intellectual Sentiment.
Boehner’s Folly: will it doom Constitutional America? House Leadership and Boehner’s Folly purposely fumbled and turned over the ball on the one yard line.
Boycott the airlines until they stop the groping and begin profiling. Boycott the airlines; if you can’t go on a company plane or drive, don’t go at all.
Catastrophic Spending: Change You Can Believe In. The most dangerous Change in all of Obamunism is Catastrophic Spending.
The Global Village concept seeks to replace National Sovereignty by default. Marxian "Global Village-ism" makes major inroads among outlaws, and among elitist intellectuals.
We argue against income minimums and caps, and for a free and private market. Income minimums and caps are Marxism’s “moral” bait to gain popular support for Socialism on the path to typical Marxist absolute dictatorship.
True, the world oil supply is limited; but, so are the stars in the universe. "The world oil supply is cruising toward depletion" is the Chicken-Little call from the Left. But it ain't necessarily so.
Marxists and Moslems: The Last Barbarians. The last barbarians not yet converted or conquered by Western civilization are Marxists and Moslems.
Our argument against fads, fashions, popular trends and herd instinct. If speaking against fads makes me square, un-cool or un-hip, then so be it. All fads are, in microcosm, expressions of rebellion against tradition.
If an American Redirection is underway; we all need to look at it. Reviewing some implications of the newly coined Science / Democracy Obversion theory underlying the new American Redirection.
Refuting Separation of Church and State as a Constitutional Principle. If Separation of Church and State cannot be found in our Constitution, what makes it a Constitutional Principle? Nothing. It is NOT a Constitutional Principle.
Of the four Republican candidates left standing, only Santorum gets it. Romney? No. Gingrich? No. Paul? No. Only Santorum gets it.
Definition of Capitalism: Economic Organization based on Private Property. Any true definition of Capitalism must state that it is purely an Economic system, not a Government system, and it works most efficiently and profitably under Representative Government.
God and Nature: on the Nature of Things, established by the Creator of Things. on man’s Perversion of the Nature of Things, even with the best of intentions.
Going whole-Hog on American Constitutional Restoration. It's all or nothing, now. If we don't go whole-hog on Constitutional Restoration, the USA is history.
Introducing Glenn Beck Progressivism, and the depth of the hidden movement. Glenn Beck Progressivism: the unseen and unrecognized advance of Marxism.
If we have an inherent right to something, then, who must supply it? Rights and Responsibilities exist in paired sets; a right does not exist in the absence of a related responsibility. If indeed we have a right to our job, then, someone must provide it. Who?
The Three Big Ideas competing in global geopolitics today. The Three Big Ideas, and a Fourth one: aggressive, militant atheism, or secularism.
Only clear, distinct political battle lines will save Constitutional America. Fuzzy, indistinct political battle lines only encourage and feed the "bipartisan" progressive destruction of this last bastion of Human Liberty.
Political, Theological and Philosophical Pigeonholes. No one exactly fits any Pigeonhole; you're not supposed to Pigeonhole anyone; but what about their own words, actions and behavior?
Absolute Truth, as The Winning Political Force to be Reckoned With. The 2016 Candidate who stands in Truth rather than whatever various audiences want to hear will beat everyone, severely.
The Social Formula [Culture=Religion+Politics] is Inviolate. Politics merely organize Human Culture around the predominant Religious beliefs of a distinct and identifiable People.
Whether the result means death or rebirth, the American Reset will be painful. America was born in Revolution. If the reset means rebirth, it will only come through re-revolution.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the