Formerly the Thinking Catholic Strategic Center
Vic Biorseth, Saturday, June
Is reality - existence itself - all self grounded?
The "Big Bang" is now being disapproved by "scientists", because ... well, because it points to matter being created out of nothing, which points to an immaterial creator.
Can't have that.
Note that disapproved is not disproved. It is simply out of favor. Secularized science today is obsessed with the notion of self-grounded existence. It is an obsession, and this obsession is the reason I consider "scientific" atheism to be a mental illness.
Figures like Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking evangelize the world into their own obsession through flawed education. Formal education is already infected with Cultural Marxism and associated "scientific" falsehoods, historical falsehoods and false catastrophic environmental crises all aimed at centralizing political power through purposely mal-educated and frightened citizenry.
So the Big Bang is out. Does that mean that the universe is not expanding any more? Well, no, ... not quite.
Does that mean that all the calculations of the age of the universe, based on that one certain point from which everything in the universe is rapidly expanding away from? Well, no, ... not quite.
So then, what does it mean?
It means that, because the math blows up at the singularity, and at the event horizon of a black hole, the theory can't be correct, because math is the one absolutely perfect, precise science; it cannot "blow up". If a theory cannot be calculated, the theory cannot be correct.
Math is absolute; anything beyond math is transcendent and extra or super natural, and incalculable. And that simply cannot be. If the formula blows up, the formula is wrong. Good formulae do not blow up.
So say the wizards of smart.
But what's really behind the "scientific" disapproval of Big Bang theory is transcendence itself. The very idea of a transcendent being or unnatural cause of - everything. And anything. If God cannot be calculated, then God does not exist. See?
Matter always was and always will be. There's just some knowledge about it that we don't possess yet, but we will; we will; some day, we will.
So the universe is a self-contained and self-explaining system, containing untold millions and billions of of other self-contained and self-explaining systems, all of which are or will be calculable and understandable by science. That's what science is for.
The premise seems to be that only mathematics is "true".
But, if only math is "true", can they prove it?
Are physics, chemistry, mathematics, etc., gods, or altars to gods? Is a mathematical formula a liturgy? Are scientists priests, or are they gods? What modern science seems to be saying is that science is the center and font of all truth; not God. They displace God. Does that not mean they replace Him? Where is the creed, or the catechism, or the explanation for this religion? How does it work?
I see a danger here of men beginning to worship themselves.
This pure science thinking started with the Enlightenment and Modernism, and got it's first real "scientific" boost from Darwinism. Evolution of species, unproven to this very day, is the "scientific" basis for belief in self-contained and self-grounded systems. From there it spread to self-explained systems of human consciousness, through the silly belief system of Freudianism. From there it spread to self-explained systems of social and socio-economic consciousness, through the silly belief system of Marxism.
But all of this is pseudo-science. It is Scientism, which is much more of a faith-based or religious belief system than actual science.
Scientists who are convinced and zealous atheists have an obsessive need to produce explanations for systems that preclude any transcendent creator or being. They want to explain both the beginning and the development of complex systems, such as the universe, such as the atom, such as complex compounds, such as the living cell, such as the human being, through "nature" alone. Without considering the beginning of nature itself, of course; that's why the new "always was and always will be" latest explanation of everything.
What they completely overlook, or distract attention from, is:
Things break down. They become more simple, not more complex.
Life, for instance. Living beings.
New species are believed to evolve from chance favorable mutation.
But mutation, in every case, produces less genetic material than it began with, not more. That means the mutant form is more simple, not more complex, than the parent form. Devolution, rather than evolution. The more mutation occurs, the less change in generations is possible, because there is always less genetic material for nature to work with, never more.
So, if Darwin's theory is true, where did complexity originate?
What pure materialism points to is pointless, purposeless, accidental existence, with no origination. It just always was and always will be. It forces a replacement of morality with "values", and "values" are determined in a purely utilitarian fashion. A thing, or a person, either has utility - some form of usefulness - or it does not.
Currently, we are all worried about the advance of moral relativism. In the complete absence of belief in God and in God's Law, moral relativism should be the least of our worries. Pure material utilitarianism enables the worst forms of human barbarity to come to the forefront. "Secular Humanism" is small potatoes. And we've been here before, but we haven't learned from the history of the gulags, the state terror, the famines, the camps, the slave labor, the ovens, the mass murder, etc.
I'm not saying that's what our most famous and prominent scientists are driving at. I'm just saying that's what Marxism is using them to accomplish.
Today, thanks to the preeminence of material science over Judaeo-Christian belief, we see people "identifying" as other than whatever they are, and our government supporting their "right" to pretend to be other than whatever they are, and punishing us for not pretending that they are other than whatever they are.
Just as Marxocrat politicians pretend to be (or "Identify" as) pro-Americans, and just as Republicrats pretend to be (or "identify" as) conservatives, and just as not a few mortal enemies of Jesus Christ and His Church pretend to be (or "identify" as) Roman Catholic Bishops.
Look around at how many grown, educated adults are wringing their hands and worrying about how to solve the newly discovered problem of transgenderism, and how to accommodate all the exponentially multiplying varieties.
They actually believe it.
And it all started with one little lie ...
Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click any footnote link to see the acronym and a detailed explanation.)SLIMC1 Secularist Liberal Intellectual Media Complex
The Brilliantly Conceived Organization of the USA; Vic Biorseth
Return to the BLOG page
Return to the HOME PAGE
Subscribe to our Free E-Zine News Letter
Date: Fri Mar 13 10:29:07 2020
I must say... Once, I have been in a similar boat as people like Dawkins and Hawking. It's easy to believe such lies as theirs - just like a mirage, it all seems real and solid from a distance. But when you poke at it directly - it fades away like nothing. How utterly ironic is that the preachers of evolutions and quantum mechanics (two of the most unscientific/magical strains of non-thinking in contemporary "science") deride the faithful for believing in God. And the reason why these lies in particular are believed with such ease is because they possess smidgens of truth. Micro-evolution is well-proven - however, the lie rears itself when, with a straight face, some people tell that the humans evolved from apes or, in the beginning, from mere bacteria. Suppose that evolution was true. That the tautology "the fittest survive" is taken to it's ultimate conclusion - why there are multiple species at all, all with their sometimes-very-narrow, but in all cases expressly defined ecological niches? Why there didn't arise a "super-organism" that would combine all the "best" attributes in itself over time? If, supposedly, something like bacteria could "evolve" into man over some few billion years, why a single species of "ultimate lifeform" (with absolutely no weaknesses) hadn't overrun the Earth yet (especially if the "fit" traits should've included things like constant telomere replication - which would render lifeforms with such a trait immune to old age)? Isn't that a theory-piercing question? Well... Like that parable about two houses goes, you cannot build your house on sand - if the theory cannot withstand the scrutiny of basic logic and is self-contradictory at it's very premise, it cannot be true, because God did not make physical reality to be illogical. Quantum mechanics are even worse - it is a prime example of what happens if the math tosses away the necessary physical assumptions. Sub-atomic particles - in current theory - are supposed to be "points" and yet, points cannot exist in reality (as reality is three-dimensional and points, being zero-dimensional, are infinitely small). Or that, in Quantum Electrodynamics, charge is transmitted by "virtual" ("not real", "not observable" - sounds like screwed-up math to me) photons that cannot be shown to interact with anything mechanically (now that is some bullshit/magic), leaving the electromagnetic charge with NO mechanical cause (which is impossible according to simple logic). Same with the "weak force" - it is supposed to be mediated by W+/W- and Z-bosons (which are heavier then entire atoms of iron, if we look at the level of energy these bosons are supposed to have - namely, 80 GeV). According to QED, W+/W- bosons facilitate the reversal/"flavor change" of a quark in a given proton/neutron - yet, the energy level for a given quark (up or down) is something like 4 MeV. How come you need something so strong to "reverse" something so much smaller (in terms of energy)? In macroscopic terms, that's a lot like redirecting a bowling ball with a Tsar bomb. That's a huge, red flag according to simple logic. And then, we get this gem - the W- boson decays into an electron (0.5 MeV) and a neutrino (even the neutrinos released in experiments on Earth cap out at some 28 GeV - and the natural-released ones have lower energy then the aforementioned electron). Where that huge amount of energy that's not covered by an electron or the neutrino actually goes? Neither to the electron - neither to the neutrino. According to current theory, it must've went to the "vacuum". I bullshit you not - some "scientists" really believe that "borrowing" energy from the "vacuum" (despite, you know, "vacuum" being a void and one of postulates of physics being that you cannot assign an extension, energy, force, whatever to the vacuum). Then, we move onto the natures of the weak force bosons. They were initially predicted to be massless by the SU (2) gauge theory - but, experiments show that they are NOT massless? Well. That's what we have the Higgs mechanism and Higgs' boson (which are also not proven by any mechanics) for - as some sort of a "symmetry-breaking" (logic-breaking, more likely - of course, there is no actual mechanics in there, just pure hogwash of a theory) post-hoc correction to the math. And that's just the weak force... The strong force - with it's fully-theoretical/fully-unobserved gluons and quarks (where the abscence of quarks in experiments is taken as "proof" of "confinement" (which states that due to a special, "color" charge field, the quarks are combined into protons and neutrons and, of course, cannot be separated without - wait for it - quarks borrowing the energy from the vacuum and spawning new linked quarks immediately, preventing isolation). I submit that the errors in "quantum mechanics" (there is little there to do with mechanics - and, the Quantum Chromodynamics/strong force stands as wholly non-mechanical). Of course, all this is just a light - comparatively - critique (a full critique would probably require tomes upon tomes of books). As Murray Gell-Mann said:
"In order to obtain such relations that we conjecture to be true, we use the method of abstraction from a Lagrangian field-theory model. In other words, we construct a mathematical theory of the strongly interacting particles, which may or may not have anything to do with reality, find suitable algebraic relations that hold in the model, postulate their validity, and then throw away the model. We may compare this process to a method sometimes employed in French cuisine: a piece of pheasant meat is cooked between two slices of veal, which are then discarded."
So... Math drives physics - math is to be put before reality. No matter who you read - Hawking most of all - most of contemporary physicists state something to the effect of "we are not concerned with reality, because we don't claim to know anything about reality; we only want to match the math to the experiment." And they call us unreasonable. Post-modernism at it's finest, there. So... Anytime a haughty "Steven Hawking" or a "Richard Dawkins" tries to "educate" you with intimidating/magical tales of splitting particles, you can always ask them such loaded questions as the problems I've described above - and whether their belief in "science"/scientism is more "reasonable" then your and mine belief in God.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Get in the fight! Engage the Enemy!
Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.
All Published Articles
By Publication Date
Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and
broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in
thereat. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life:
and few there are that find it! Beware of false prophets, who come to you in
the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Jesus Christ; Matt 7:13-15
Publicly identifying pure stupidassism pretending to be highly educated, elitist, intelligent and intellectual thought.
The Absolute Stupidassism Pages
When the Emperor Has No Clothes, it shouldn't take a little child to point that out to everyone else. We have a real societal problem when large numbers of grown, educated adults do not automatically recognize a clearly stupid argument, position or proposition on the very first encounter.
On organizing best (worst?) of the truly stupidassed pages under their own stupidassed heading. The Stupidassed Pages now represent a category of their own in the Contents of this WebSite.
Absolutely Intolerant Indiscrimination destroying human civilization. Intolerant Indiscrimination? Can we be Intolerant and Indiscriminate at the same time? You betcha.
Atheist Lunacy Opposes Science and Nature and leads to Social Suicide. Lies are attracted to each other; big lies incorporate all smaller lies; master liars recruit armies of lesser liars, all increasingly committed to Social Suicide.
The Fag Identity Crisis, or "Springsteen Syndrome", that now owns the USCCB. The USCCB's Catholic Fag Identity Crisis highlights their linguistic abuse of "discrimination" as done with "Distribution".
Madam Hillary let the cat out of the bag on Extraterrestrial Contact. You never see Madam Hillary and Mazlan Othman at the same time, do you? They may be the same shape-shifting alien being.
Bruce Springsteen can't help it; he really needs to use the lady's room. With the periodic gender swings of the dreaded Springsteen Syndrome, comes the compulsion to just walk into women's restrooms and locker rooms.
On the growing and feeding of Useful Idiocy to advance Marxism. The evil, purposeful, planned, "unintended consequences" and opposite results, all made possible through the growing of Useful Idiocy.
All of Comrade Obama's Exploited "Settled-Science" Stupid-Asses. Obama's not stupid; he's evil. But his "Useful Idiot" Settled-Science Stupid-Asses all embrace Democratized Science. And that's just flat out stupid.
The Anti-God Obsession: Making Reality self-grounded and self-explanatory. The Anti-God Obsession describes the obsessive Need to believe that all systems are self-contained, self-explained and self-grounded.
Reason versus Materialism, or, Purpose versus Pointlessness. The reason versus materialism debate takes causality to its ultimate and unavoidable source, against Pure Materialistic Stupid Ass-ism.
Stupidassism: Stupidassery commandeered by politicians for herding stupid asses. On the many branches of Stupidassery sucked into the multiple Marxocrat Party political programs of Stupidassism.
Global Absolute Stupidassism: Opposing American Constitutional Absolutism. Most Political Parties and most Federal Bureaucracies are based on Global Absolute Stupidassism.
On PC Stupidassery: Political Correctness Insanity. PC Stupidassery; a Political Platform, supported by indoctrination, propaganda and a fooled population.
Naked Elite: The Intelligentsia Have No Clothes; their arguments: empty suits. The Naked Elite, and their stupid, unsupportable positions camouflaged by unanimous consensus and highfalutin language.
Stupidified and Chickafied America: Creating a dumbed-down and sissified public. The Chickafied American Moron Voters will always look for the easy way out.
The why of it: are our teachers, leaders and our journalists all just stupid? Everything everyone in Washington does these days raises questions about the why of it all.
Definition of Anarchy: Opposition to State Authority in favor of - well - Gangs. They said it couldn’t be done; but even the most cursory Definition of Anarchy shows it to be even more stupid than Communism.
Bill O’Reilly’s Elitist Pompous Assininity. Bill O’Reilly put the Pomp in Pompous Assininity.
The Un-Godly Drive toward Worldly Perfectibility. On Secular goals of Human Perfectibility, Worldly Perfectibility and Universal Perfectibility.
God Denial = Nature Denial = Science Denial = Nonsense. Falling into God Denial always leads into simple foolishness, and that path always ends in utter insanity.
The REAL Science Deniers almost always turn out to be in serious God Denial. To ignore the absence of Scientific Evidence is to ignore Nature, and be a true Science Denier.
On Evil and Nonsense: Look closely at Nonsense, and find Evil at its root. Evil and Nonsense: deny evil and you deny right vs. wrong; which is to deny common sense, which is to invoke nonsense.
On Theory Dominating Substance, in science, religion, morality, and culture. Everywhere we look, we see the theoretical trumping the substantial, up and down the line.
The Anti-Capitalism Pages, illustrating the advance of Global Stupidassism. All Capitalism is is a Free Market, subject only to the natural laws of supply and demand.
Is Discrimination prohibited to Government, or to Citizenry? Our Constitution restrains government, not citizenry; it FREES the citizenry to discriminate.
On the elimination of all sense of Scandal from any society. Where there is no Scandal, and nothing at all is Scandalous, the whole Culture has gone Evil.
The Indiana Boycotters Celebrate Sodomy and Anathematize Christianity. Does your company celebrate Sodomy, or Christianity? They cannot celebrate both.
Marxist Ideology: Feeding Human Dependency and starving Human Capital. Human Capital creates wealth; Human Dependency consumes wealth. Very simple; nothing to it.
Multi-Culturalism: Suicidal Diversity. How on earth could hetorgeneity displace homgeneity without destroying culture?
Concerning the "Good Without God" twits: What, exactly, is good without God? Good without God? How? If there be no God, then, exactly what is good, what is evil, and what are they based on?
You cannot legislate morality is the false claim of the immoral. We MUST legislate morality, as long as the legislature is representative of the people. Otherwise, what is legislated reflects the whim of the dictator(s) of the moment.
Jesus had Zeal for His House. Do we have Zeal for our American House? Is there any evil, any sin at all, before which you would stand firm and say "Not in my house!"?
On the developing Catholic theological "Mercy War". Has Blessed Cardinal Newman's "Development of Christian Doctrine" been weaponized in the new Mercy War?
Our current stupid war policy is clearly aimed at military failure. But the political opposition has their own stupid war policy cocked and ready to go.
Stupid Political Arguments: False Premises and Talking In Circles. Presenting the stupid political arguments of our Marxist Democrats, always initiated and publicly argued for them by their News Media.
Recognizing the Bipartisan or Nonpartisan Treason Destroying Civilization. The seductive desire for brotherly peaceful cooperation corrupts the world through nonpartisan treason.
Conquest by Delusion: Making us conquer ourselves. Destructive Social Delusion, induced by disinformation, mal-education, indoctrination and propaganda.
Should you love your enemies until they finally kill us all and conquer good? Did the Commandment to love your enemies mean that you should love Satan?
On the Interfaith Worker Justice (IWJ) Communization of Faith. IWJ brings all faiths together to form a delusional New World Order of egalitarianism. By all appearances.
Musings on the deep treachery of the most trusted among us. Deep Treachery: Were they all deceiving us from the beginning, or did they somehow "turn" after being raised to positions of trust?
Progressivism: The Evil Stratagem of Slow Global Conquest via Delusion. Progressivism is Satan's "Reasoned", "Scientific", Kinder, Gentler path to the Destruction of Civilization, through Induced Delusion.
The Confederate Flag is also the Democrat Party Flag. Surprise. It's the Democrat Party Flag. "Democrat" is Synonymous with "Confederate", and should be used interchangeably.
"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII
"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi
Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston Churchill
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the