Vic Biorseth, Saturday, October 02, 2010
Once upon a time, in a more innocent era, after Western Civilization had acquired that sense of individual liberty that automatically associates with legalized individual rights, a man was free to do as he pleased, so long as it was within the law and the rules of civility and decency.
It became quite popular for young men to set out, in some way, to “make their fortune.” Even those from well-to-do families got this itch, this urge to be free and on their own; to make their own way in the world, and perhaps make a name for themselves while they were at it. They competed with poor men, or men less well-off than them, who were doing the same thing, but in greater numbers. Every young man wanted to “make his fortune” and then live a life of relative ease, as some version of the “propertied gentleman.”
Of course, fortunes were made; fortunes were squandered or lost; some fortunes were solidified and built upon. But most efforts to “make my fortune” resulted in finding a way to make a living, in one way or another, some better than others. Many of the “better off” sojourners eventually returned to the family in a somewhat worse off condition, in the manner of the Prodigal Son.
The family offers stability; going it alone offers reward, but also risk.
Still, the urge to be out on your own is strong in youth, and it often overpowers even common sense. In any society, in any land, all one has to do is look around to see that the best economic progress is made slowly but surely within some group, and the best group for this progress is the family. If an ignorant and illiterate man is free to do so, he will find work or business, however humble, sufficient to support his children, who may join him in his work or business, or start something new, while under his support.
When, or shortly before, the patriarch or matriarch dies, the estate, however grand or humble, is handed on. In Biblical times, the inheritance went to the first born son, unless there was no son. Over time it became a matter of the judgment of the one who made the will. A prudent son or daughter might be chosen over the first born son, in the interest of maintaining the inheritance for the good of the whole family.
Now, in ancient times, all property was owned by men, with one exception, that being women who were widows. When a woman married, all of her property became the property of her husband. When a woman became a widow, she was an exception to almost all rules; she was propertied, she was respected, she had a public voice, she was virtually the equivalent of a man, before the law. However, if she remarried, all of that changed, because all of her property became the property of her new husband. For that reason, many widows did not remarry, and Scripture speaks of highly respected wealthy widows who supported the early Church.
In today’s society, at least in what’s left of Western Civilization, women are pretty much equal to men in all matters before the law. (Heavy sigh.)
It is always easier for members of the family to go out and do work or do business for the profit of themselves, and of the family, when they already are provided with the shelter, clothing and food that is part of the family estate, whether that estate be grand or humble. The rule is just as true in a palace as it is in a hut. For this reason, there is wisdom in sticking by your family and maintaining family ties, all your life. The bigger the family fortune becomes, the more important this rule becomes; but that is not to say that it isn’t important for the kids growing up in some housing project or other poor environment.
That rich kid doesn’t deserve his inheritance, because he didn’t earn it, is the popular gripe from the envious. Well, he doesn’t have to deserve it, and he doesn’t have to earn it. It is freely given by the one who owns it. Why should it have been given to someone else? Did he not have legal possession of it? Was it not his to give to whomever he chose?
An equally bad argument could be made regarding the grace of God that has been given to you. You do not deserve it, because you didn’t earn it. Yet God gave it to you, not because you deserved it, and not because you earned it, but simply because He chose to give it; it was His to give and He gave it to you, so that you may accept it or reject it, of your own free will. In a similar manner, the family fortune is handed on to the rich son by the free will of the parent, and the rich son may accept it, reject it, squander it or protect it and build upon it. That is the gamble the parent takes.
The question the parent needs to ask before passing on the estate is whether the inheritors are to “share and share alike” or the estate is to remain intact, for the benefit of the survivors. It is clear and obvious that share and share alike or otherwise dividing up the estate is destructive of the family fortune. Keeping it all together is the only way for it to grow, but at some risk. Somewhere down the line, some inheritor might somehow loose it all, and the family will be the worse for it. But splitting it apart by legal will is almost certain to destroy it immediately, because each inheritor will simply go his own way with his portion until it is exhausted, and then there will be no remaining family estate to return to.
Do you begin to see the wisdom of the original “first born son” rule? Today it might be better for the grantor to discern and judge the most stable, prudent and decent from among the children than simply going with the eldest son. But it may be seen that keeping the family fortune intact will serve to keep the family itself intact. Each family member always has the existing estate to fall back on and to live within the shelter of. The most successful families are the large ones with a long history, and with a gradually building family farm, or business, or fortune of some kind.
That is how Abraham, Isaac and Jacob grew their holdings of flocks and herds, their servants and their clan. Look at the American families of the Vanderbilts, the Rockefellers, the Fords, etc., and try to imagine where those families might be if the estate had been broken up with the end of the founding generation. Now, you can talk all you want to about how the younger Fords didn’t deserve or didn’t earn their position in the company, or their wealth, or whatever – but, if they didn’t deserve it, then who, pray tell, did deserve it? Would it have been better for the original company to flounder or die with the founder? Does the right to private property – the right to own something – still exist, or not?
Karl Marx hated all of that; in fact, he found it revolting. As a deadbeat, he felt the world owed him his rent, and his food, and all that he needed for his own maintenance. Having alienated himself from God and from family, rather than returning to them in his destitution, he sought their destruction through violent revolution. He hated religion, he hated the family, he hated private property, and he sought the forceful, violent, revolutionary elimination of all of them. He said so in the Communist Manifesto. He made his life’s work the incitement of envy, strife and class warfare in order to violently upset the status-quo.
Let us briefly look at the closing words of Marx’s most famous and most widely read work, to gain a little insight into what this thing called Marxism is, exactly.
In short, Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things.
In all these movements they bring to the front, as the leading question in each, the property question, no matter what its degree of development at the time.
Finally, they labour everywhere for the union and agreement of the democratic parties of all countries.
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at the Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!
I think you can see by this that Karl Marx was a real whacko. However, his words struck a chord among, of all things, many who belonged to the intellectual elites; the so-called intelligentsia. And I offer this as proof of my long held contention that education and privilege are no guarantee against stupidity. Defending the “wisdom” of Marxism became a parlor fad among the pseudo-sophisticated elites, the last place you would expect such a call to bloody revolution against the whole social order to ever take root. But, stupidity will accommodate anything.
Since publication around 1848, Marx’s notions have taken root in various forms here in America. The biggest one seems to be in a sense of universal “rights” adopted by the elites and, through them, inculcated into the subconscious psyches of the people and their representatives. We seem to have a sense of a Marx-like “right” to some things, such as our house or our rent, our health care, our food, our water, our income, our education, etc., etc., etc. At our national founding, all of these things were our responsibilities; now they are widely held to somehow be human rights. This is nonsense, of course.
Let us take health care as an example. Seeking medicines or medical attention is, quite simply, a personal responsibility – one either accepts that responsibility, or does not, and similarly accepts the results of his own decision. You get the medicine or the medical attention you can afford, just like everything else in life, because it is your responsibility. The fact that you might sicken or even die in the absence of medicine or medical attention you cannot afford to pay for adds nothing to the argument; you have no automatic “right” to the best medicine or the best medical attention.
Food and water may be of more vital and more immediate importance to you than any medicine or medical attention. If you do not eat food, you will soon sicken and die from a condition called starvation. If you do not drink water, you will sicken and die even sooner, from a condition called dehydration. Yet you have no right to food, let alone the best food, or to water, let alone good, or the best, water. It is your first responsibility to acquire adequate food and drink for your own sustenance, just as it is your first responsibility to acquire any needed medicines or medical attention on your own.
It is your responsibility to get the best water you can afford, the best food you can afford, the best health care you can afford, the best car or bicycle or horse you can afford, the best clothes you can afford, etc. You have no automatic right to any of these things. Marxism puts the state on top and the citizen at the bottom; liberty puts the citizen on top, and establishes the government to serve the citizen. The state can provide none of these things for the citizen anywhere near as well as the citizen can provide them for himself.
Wealth as a fixed pie is the vision that Marx foisted upon his stupid elitist fans. The notion that wealth is fixed forever, and that some of us unfairly have a larger portion than others of us, is just plain stupid on its face. The whole idea of Marxism revolves round the notion of one getting his so-called fair share of the pie. History proves that the advance of Marxism destroys the whole pie, and produces no new pie. In other words, as Marxism advances, everyone becomes poorer. In truth, Marxism secretly seeks dictatorship, and dictators are rarely poor. Search long and hard through history and you will find no Socialist dictator who was poor, or whose subjects were not poor. Most of Marxism’s Useful Idiots are totally unaware of the fact that the real secret goal of Marxism is pure dictatorship.
This unhealthy fixation on wealth as a fixed pie feeds the equally stupid notion that anyone who owns anything automatically owns it at the expense of someone else who does not own as much. These owners of stuff are demonized by Marxism as the expropriators, and as the hated bourgeois. If you own something, you are guilty. If someone else doesn’t own as much, you owe him something. It just doesn’t get any dumber than this. Lots – perhaps a majority – of teachers, university professors, journalists and celebrities actually believe this crap. And they teach it, and pass it on.
It explains why you will frequently hear someone who has been successful at something, almost anything, speaking about doing some charitable act, not as simple charity, but using words like “giving something back” to the community. As if being successful was somehow sinful and detracting from the community. If you buy something or earn something or win something, you have taken nothing from anyone, and there is nothing for you to “give back.” You are called to charity – we all are – but that is not the paying of any debt; it is the simple act of giving out of a sense of charity.
The call ”Workers (of whatever) Unite!” and the organization of workers into unions is inspired right straight out of the Communist Manifesto. Unions today do little more than set workers against their own employers, to the absolute detriment of the very business that pays them to do their work. Today our Marxist-leaning government supports unions and opposes business to the degree that it is becoming unprofitable to even do business in America. Consider the long term affects of union demands on the business, increased taxes on the business and increased restrictive government regulation on the business: how, exactly, do these things work in the long term interest of the worker who depends on the business for his livelihood? Workers and the businesses they work for should not operate at cross purposes. The real goal of Marxism is to absolutely control if not own all business, or to destroy business, all at the expense of the hated bourgeoisie.
And the hated bourgeoisie, of course, in all likelihood started out as just another family business, and did nothing to anyone, and is guilty of nothing.
Today the death tax seeks to destroy inheritance and eliminate the “advantage” of the family business or farm or fortune of any kind. Marx was a real fruit-cake, in that he despised the family and God so much that he hoped his “revolution” would eliminate them and purge them altogether from human society. His impossible, idiotic idea of the state producing and controlling perfect, happy workers to produce wealth to be equally distributed actually was, and is, believed, by educated and otherwise intelligent people. Go figure. After January 1, 2011, the death tax will be, I believe, 55% of whatever you leave to your heirs. So much for the family farm. So much for the family bakery shop. So much for the family whatever.
If you don’t recognize anything else, dear reader, recognize the sheer stupidity of Marxist notions, and the impending peril posed by the real Marxists, i.e., the ones who intend to turn this nation into a dictatorship pure and simple. For them, Marxism is merely a tool, as is Islam. See the The Last Barbarians for a further explanation of these two tools of the would-be dictator who intends to seize power during some crisis or other.
It might be that our only hope of getting back on Constitutional track rests in passage of The Fair Tax, which will outlaw all other forms of taxation, including the inheritance tax. Unfortunately, even that possibility might depend entirely upon winning really, really big in November, and then successful impeachments as described in the grounds for impeachment article. If something along those lines is not successful, then America as founded may be lost forever.
Don’t let that happen.
Reconcile with your family if you have been estranged for some reason. Call them if you haven’t spoken in awhile. Instill a sense of family pride in your children and grandchildren. Re-establish the old traditions of the family and of the common purpose of family support. Whatever you acquire in this life, leave to your most trusted heir, for the safekeeping and building of a family fortune, to the greater benefit of all members of the family.
Call your dad and your mom; say a prayer to them if they are gone to their reward. Write some loving thoughts to your siblings and your extended family. Show your children your love for them. Disregard the rantings of the Marxians as the common blithering of idiots.
May you please God, and may you live forever.
Return to Web Site Log (BLOG) page
Return to HOME PAGE
Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" over a link.)
I avoid social media, having been burned by poor security in that arena. You may contact me through comments at the bottom of any webpage on this website, including this one. I am the only one who sees, approves and publishes these comments, or not. Regards, Vic
(Each published webpage, change or comment automatically sends the webpage to the top of the Thinking Catholic Blog Roll by date and time.)
Date: Wed Dec 22 22:06:38 2010
The death-tax just past, at 35%, which is probably enough to destroy most family farms as soon as the owner dies. Barny Frank said it was no big deal because none of the would-be inheritors deserved it because they didn’t earn it. In other words, the government earned it. Or the government gets whatever is deemed to be “not earned” by anyone. You are absolutely correct here.
Date: Thu Dec 23 06:01:46 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Every time the House Faggot, Slobbering Barny Frank speaks, I am both amused and a little bit frightened. Sometimes I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. How such a clear anti-American ever got his seat, how he retains it, is beyond me. That people vote for him is a very important thing to note. The people who are stupid enough to vote for him may be more dangerous to America than he is.
As is typical with Marxists, he opposes virtually everything we hold dear. As an open homosexual, he even opposes nature itself. He clearly opposes all of Marx’s most demonized targets, which are God, the normative family and private property.
All of these things were heavily targeted for destruction in Marx’s great seminal work, the Democrat Manifesto. I mean Communist.
Wednesday, December 12,
Converted Page to SBI! Release 3.0 BB 2.0.
Date: Wed Dec 12
From: Joans macFarquhar
Location: Katonah NY
Tocqueville II.II.19 shows that American farms were always commercial and industrial, contradicting the feudal casuitry about the inherited family farm
Date: Thu Apr 17 08:58:01 2014
Joans, that is not true. Our farm has been in our family since 1888 and we are typical around here.
Date: Day Mon 00 2014
From: Vic Biorseth
Agreed. Apparently I did not properly read or interpret Joans' comment back in 2012 when it was made or I would have responded. I'm still not sure I fully understand it. Here is a link to Tocqueville II.II.19:
Possibly Joans was misinterpreting Tocqueville's use of the word Industry for something other than industriousness. People still, today, buy land, improve it, sell it and move on. Many others stay put, particularly those who love the land they are on. There is nothing wrong and everything right with inheritance. Whether the inheritance is land, dollars or anything else, it is the right of the owner to will it to whomever he pleases.
Joans is right in that it has nothing to do with feudalism, or "classes", which is what Marxism implies.
Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely trading insults. Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things.
Never be lukewarm.
Life itself demands passion.
He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.
He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.
In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.
Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.
Welcome to my website.
Catholic American Thinker Free E-zine Subscription
What are you passionate about? Express it on-line.
Take a Video-Tour of how to create your own website, blog, online e-business, passive affiliate-ad business, etc., right here.
Video Testimonies of people pursuing their passion through SBI!
General Commentary Pages
Various unrelated topics that stirred thought and provoked writing (or quoting) at one time or another. The Everything Else Bucket.
Work at home jobs that have had me. A long, costly and unsuccessful run at work from home jobs that didn't work for us.
Truth versus Agenda addresses the simplest of problems greatly complexified. Truth versus Agenda examines the contest between reality and its opposition.
Vic has Iron Weights for sale; Mama says they have to go. Lots of iron weights for sale; all have to go at once, in one sale.
The challenge describes Capitalism as illusory and Marxism as solid. The mixture of religion just adds to the confusion of all good realists.
Indifferentism and Moral Relativism eats away at Catholic Culture. Catholicism stands against Indifferentism. Where do you stand?
My poor old truck is again starting to look like a poor old truck. After half-a-million miles, we're now approaching another decision time; another paint job, or a new truck.
Battle Line: Where the advancing secular army meets Judeo-Christian moral norms. The Secular Position (or Agenda) involves Proactive, Aggressive Anti-Theism, and not merely "neutral" Atheism.
A return to the American Ideal means a severe reduction in Government. To return to positive growth and progress means, necessarily, purging our nation from all Marxist-Socialist philosophical influence and a return to the American Ideal.
Why this hatred of Palin? What galls modern women of the Left about Sarah Palin? The blind hatred of Palin we’re seeing expressed is not merely because of hatred and intolerance of the pro-life religious moral standard.
A Palin Parker Ticket? My Dream Candidates for 2012. Why a Palin Parker ticket is better than any professional politician Republican ticket you can come up with for 2012.
Elitism Vs Palinism: Why the Left and the Elites Loath and Fear Sarah Palin. It isn’t just Marxism Vs Palinism; it’s also established intellectual elitism vs Palinism. The elite need someone to look down upon.
How is it that opposing amnesty for millions of illegal aliens is "arrogant"? If my pro-Catholic, pro-American, anti-alternative-ethos position is "arrogant," then, exactly what is the position of those who claim superiority or even equality with it?
Here we see Bush family class captured in a simple private citizen’s photo. George W. (and Mrs.) Bush quietly demonstrate Bush family class without hoopla or fanfare.
Marxists love crisis, and they love an oil spill crisis most of all. Marxists even create and drive crisis. Their favorite crisis of all must be the Oil Spill Crisis, which is even better than a Banking Crisis.
American Military Assault Weapons originally intended in the 2nd Amendment. To miss the point of the 2nd Amendment is to miss the point of the whole Constitution.
For God and Country – More Thoughts on America, and on National Existence. For God and Country: Comparisons of martyrdom and heroism, Sovereign Nationhood Vs. Internationalism, distinct people-hood Vs. the Global Village, and Godliness Vs. godlessness.
The Godless Left leads the young and naive to their utopian Hell. For an honest comparison of the effects on youth, we need to look to the history of the Godless Left versus the Religious Right.
The Rabbi Meir Kahane Open Letter to the World is a must read. No decent world history course is complete without the Rabbi Meir Kahane Open Letter to the World.
Aleksandr I.Solzhenitsyn warns the American Worker and American organized labor. Solzhenitsyn speaks to us as a worker from the “Worker’s Paradise” of Communism; words of warning for all who understand the meaning of the word Liberty.
World Revolution returns with a vengeance: the rebirth of Marxism. Marxist world revolution returns, and faces far less opposition than in 1848 or the period between the Great Wars.
Our argument against public despair, hopelessness and pessimism re the future. Despair is a mortal sin, the opposite of the virtue of hope; it is a sin unto the death of the soul, a repudiation and rejection of God’s grace.
On Threats to America's National Existence. A look at the nature of our national existence, what makes us America, physical threats to that, and the possibility of just going out of existence.
On the ethics of language: English dictionary Vs. Political-Correctness taboos. Language evolves, yet morals are (or should be) fixed. This poses questions re the ethics of language.
Thinking Catholic direction: threats to America, Church, Ethos, even History. The Thinking Catholic Direction is multi-faceted, facing threats to American National Existence, Catholic Liturgy, our common Guiding Ethos - emphasis changes to meet the threat of the moment.
Catholics learn and practice Glossalalia, in the Life In The Spirit seminars. Life in the Spirit seminars, fueling the Catholic Charismatic renewal, bring tongue-speaking "Glossalalia", and being "Slain in the Spirit", to Catholicism.
The website is going on hold for at least the next five weeks. Business calls, and I must respond. Will be traveling, and not taking the laptop this time.
Current Website Status. Still too busy for individual responses to questions, comments & criticisms.
Our 2006 Ohio Voter Guide. The choices are quite clear, and the 2006 Ohio Voter Guide was easy to produce.
On carrying my Lord, Jesus Christ, in my pocket. As a Eucharistic Minister, I am on occasion carrying the Lord Jesus in my pocket. It's a wondrous thing.
A 2006 Christmas and Hanukkah wish. May the Holy Days we celebrate remind us all of who we are, and how we are different from other peoples.
Current Democratic Party platform reveals anti-Semitic streak among Liberals. In their voting, their speechifying, and in the slant of their controlled mainstream media reporting, the current Democratic Party Platform is made clear to all observers.
The "Left", and The DaVinci Code, The Passion, and Cartoons of Mohammed. You can tell a lot about a movement by its public words. The Passion? "Unreservedly Bad." The DaVinci Code? "Unreservedly Good." Anything to do with Islam? "No Comment."
Who's driving the Health Care bus? Health insurance companies "grading" doctors? Health insurance companies grading doctors: a legitimized conflict of interest. A preparatory step toward the nationalization of the health insurance industry?
On the forced use of medical boiler plate language rather than simple notes. The "little dictators" from insurance companies and government bureaucracies force MDs to use stilted, verbose, medical boiler plate language in their own documentation.
Home For Christmas 2008. Website Getting Active Again
Hydrogen power could be, and should be, the wave of our automotive future. Any move toward hydrogen power is a move toward a cleaner and more efficient fuel, and away from our dangerous dependency on oil.
Thoughts in remembrance of 09/11/2001, five years later. The changing shape of the war, the changing shape of the enemy.
The Jewish Shabbat. Description of Jewish Shabbat (Sabbath) from my Holy Land item supplier.
Kerry lies again, and then lies about his lies, in concert with the SLIMC. There he goes again! Kerry lies again and again about American servicemen and veterans; he just can't help himself.
Kerry's Lies: The Old, Vietnam-Era Anti-War Chickens are Comming Home to Roost. POW Lawsuit Could Force Kerry To Come Clean - by George "Bud" Day, Chairman, Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation.
What's going on with Mel Gibson? Is he really an anti-Semite? I am surprised that Mel Gibson is an alcolholic. But I am never surprised at any words that come out of the mouth of any drunk.
Still Worrying Over NuVo Consequences. The Holidays have gone by, several days have passed, and the SANE NuVo Initiative still stands pat.
The Dem's October Surprise involves another flip-flop of their public "standard". The clearly pro-sodomy Party that openly seeks the "Gay" vote goes Victorian for another pre-election October Surprise ploy.
Some Problems with NuVo: the so-called Null-Vote Initiative. A "philosophical" movement aimed at keeping religious conservatives from voting? Seriously? Let me state my problems with NuVo.
Come, let us sit and reason together. Jews and Christians of various stripe and spot can say to each other, 'Come, let us sit and reason together.' But we can't do that with the Moslems.
Regarding SANE works dropping NuVo: Nul Vote Initiative dies with a whimper. If you can't really present a good argument, sit down. On SANE Works dropping the NuVo Initiative: a program that works hard to SOUND pro-American while ACTING to oppose American National Existence.
Even experts grossly underestimate the Marxist zeal of the American Left. The sharp Left turn happened in the Hoover-FDR era, and the Marxism of the American Left has been deepening ever since.
Thinking American, in a nutshell: When one has lots to say, but time is limited. The older I get, the busier I get. Answering multiple questions as a thinking American, but in a hurry.
"We are an Easter People, and Hallelujah is our Song." (John Paul the Great) Our absolutely unique and singular Easter story, and the incredible force with which it struck human history.
Witnessing, grieving and weeping for our dieing culture. What might it take to call a whole people back from the brink of cultural death?
If we have an inherent right to something, then, who must supply it? Rights and Responsibilities exist in paired sets; a right does not exist in the absence of a related responsibility. If indeed we have a right to our job, then, someone must provide it. Who?
So how come we have all these homeless people if our system is so great? The strong "Utopian Idealist" firmly believes that absolute worldly perfection is actually possible. Therefore, there should never be any such thing as a hungry or homeless person.
Taking a look at Illegal Imigration and Tax Problem solutions. In our view, the minimum wage and income tax have outlived their usefulness, and only contribute to the illegal alien problem.
First journal / blog entries when the thinking catholic blog first opened up. Notes to readers about what I was doing.
On-going WebSite work and planned WebPages as of 09/07/2006. Adding items to book store.
Vic's busted finger status - life goes on. Another busted finger status report, since the original one rolled off of the 50-entry BLOG update records.
Website Status as of 02/05/2009. No more Bookstore; no more Contact Me; no more complexity.
Website Status 03-09-2009. Just a note to bring you up to date on website status 03-09-2009.
Website Status 04/06/2009. Busy driving daily now; most website work will be weekend and as available.
The Plastic Bags and Eco Doom theory: will plastic bags end life as we know it? Plastic Bag and Eco Doom predictions tell us that plastic grocery and garbage bags will still be buried in the land fills and dumps a thousand years from now. Well … so what?
Farewell Smokey Biorseth; Rest In Peace. Hello Coal Biorseth; Welcome Home. As we were laying our beloved Smokey Biorseth to rest in his grave beside the lilies, a carbon-copy of Smokey, in younger form, emerged from the lilies.
Honky Biorseth really runs this house. If you want to know what's in any cabinet in the house, just ask Honky Biorseth.
Kill the illegal alien marketplace, and illegal aliens will leave on their own. Why should we "imagine" life with no Mexico? Shouldn't the Mexicans be trying to imagine no such thing as the USA?
More Marxist infiltration of higher education. Public school and the media are not the only places dominated by Marxist thought; even Catholic institutions are infected.
Of Families and Fortunes, and Inheritance Vs. Redistribution. Families and Fortunes are despised by Marxists, because Marxism demonizes the family, demonizes fortunes, and even demonizes profit.
Website Status Update 11/09/10. Just a Website status update; where we are and where we’re going.
Regarding the 2010 Tax Deal Pledge Breaker: Pledge? What Pledge? How can Republican deal makers even face us? We need to hang a Tea Party target on all professional politicians for 2012.
Pray for peace in Jerusalem, and for deliverance of Israel from harm. To pray for peace in Jerusalem is to pray for deliverance from Obama.
A tale of Promised Financial Melt-Down Debt Ceiling Nonsense and Happy Marxists. Everyone, on both sides, believes the Debt Ceiling Nonsense. Why?
God and Nature: on the Nature of Things, established by the Creator of Things. God and Nature: on man’s Perversion of the Nature of Things, even with the best of intentions.
Our Ohio voter Guide for the 2012 Election. The 2l012 Ohio Voter Guide – The Choices Have Never Been Clearer, or more critical.
Evangelization enters the animal kingdom with the first bear prayer. It is fitting that the first bear prayer would be a prayer of thanksgiving.
Is the Internet down in Lithuania? Sudden loss of Lithanian traffic suggests the internet is down in Lithuania.
The rise of the Femi Nazi Green Beret, and the decline of military victory. The first Femi Nazi Green Beret will be awarded out of fairness, not excellence.
Food Insurance: Is this stuff really any good? All of us conspiracy-theorizing, global-calamity doomsday-preppers need their Food Insurance.
We just had to try to do Robert Irvine's Plastic Wrapped Baby Back Ribs. Put plastic wrapped baby back ribs in the oven? What? Are you nuts?
Thoughts on the first Eucharist, established by the Last Supper. The first Eucharist was recognized by the Apostles for what it was on that holiest Holy Thursday.
Tea-Party-Candidates-04-18-2014. The Constitution is not going to be restored to legal preeminence unless we replace leadership incumbents of BOTH PARTIES.
Ecce homo; Behold the man. Ecce Homo. Behold the Innocent Lamb, who takes away the sins of the world.
If you can't find the page you're looking for, try the